It's almost time. Bowl season is upon us.
ABATTBQ11 said:
You need the hard fought KSU win to build up expectations for, "We're baaaaaaaacccccccccckkkkkkkk!!!!!!" in January.
33 said:ABATTBQ11 said:
You need the hard fought KSU win to build up expectations for, "We're baaaaaaaacccccccccckkkkkkkk!!!!!!" in January.
In fairness, KSU is always a tough game for any opponent. So there's that.
YellowPot_97 said:33 said:ABATTBQ11 said:
You need the hard fought KSU win to build up expectations for, "We're baaaaaaaacccccccccckkkkkkkk!!!!!!" in January.
In fairness, KSU is always a tough game for any opponent. So there's that.
In fairness, Kansas is never a tough game for any opponent, unless you're texas at home. So there's that.
33 said:YellowPot_97 said:33 said:ABATTBQ11 said:
You need the hard fought KSU win to build up expectations for, "We're baaaaaaaacccccccccckkkkkkkk!!!!!!" in January.
In fairness, KSU is always a tough game for any opponent. So there's that.
In fairness, Kansas is never a tough game for any opponent, unless you're texas at home. So there's that.
Kansas is 4-16 vs Texas (0.200 win percentage)
Kansas is 2-9 vs Texas A&M (0.182 win percentage)
Then why do you keep bringing up the past as if it is relevant to what is happening today?33 said:
Losing to Kansas is still a rare event (only twice in the last 25 years) and doesn't bother me. It's in the past.
Seems to me it's twice in the last 5 years……….or once in the last 6 weeks.33 said:
Losing to Kansas is still a rare event (only twice in the last 25 years) and doesn't bother me. It's in the past.
I brought up the history just to point out that losses happen. So what? It is irrelevant to what is happening today.ghollow said:Then why do you keep bringing up the past as if it is relevant to what is happening today?33 said:
Losing to Kansas is still a rare event (only twice in the last 25 years) and doesn't bother me. It's in the past.
It happened 2 out of the last 5 times tu played them and would have been 3 out of 5 if the refs hadn't bailed out the horns. That isn't a "rare event." Once again the horns go back to the days before scholarship limits to make this look okay for them. Again Kansas. In football.33 said:
Losing to Kansas is still a rare event (only twice in the last 25 years) and doesn't bother me. It's in the past.
33 said:I brought up the history just to point out that losses happen. So what? It is irrelevant to what is happening today.ghollow said:Then why do you keep bringing up the past as if it is relevant to what is happening today?33 said:
Losing to Kansas is still a rare event (only twice in the last 25 years) and doesn't bother me. It's in the past.
It's a sip fan. It's what they do.ghollow said:Then why do you keep bringing up the past as if it is relevant to what is happening today?33 said:
Losing to Kansas is still a rare event (only twice in the last 25 years) and doesn't bother me. It's in the past.
FIFY. Maybe not so rare.33 said:
Losing to Kansas is still a rare event (only twice in the last 5 years) and doesn't bother me. It's in the past.
33 is generally a level-headed cat from what I have gathered over my time on TexAgs, but if the Kansas loss is irrelevant to what is happening today then the National Championship over 15 years ago is certainly also irrelevant yet that's all we ever hear about.33 said:I brought up the history just to point out that losses happen. So what? It is irrelevant to what is happening today.ghollow said:Then why do you keep bringing up the past as if it is relevant to what is happening today?33 said:
Losing to Kansas is still a rare event (only twice in the last 25 years) and doesn't bother me. It's in the past.