AgBQ-00 said:
My guess is this is some one trying to do the Randolf approach. Which has been shot down time and again.
West Point Aggie said:
Oh sippies...they try so effin hard!
ABATTBQ11 said:AgBQ-00 said:
My guess is this is some one trying to do the Randolf approach. Which has been shot down time and again.
Apparently he was suing the University at one point because he sent a transcript for a chapter or introduction in a book he was writing on Gill to someone for review, and years later the guy published it to an A&M media relations page almost verbatim without crediting him. They took it down immediately after he complained, but it was spread far enough that he claimed he couldn't publish the book anymore.
That's what I thought this story was about. And agreed, you've gotta be a whole lotta stupid or dickless to pass someone's work along as your own, whether intentionally or dumbassedly.33 said:
Now, if those guys copied and published the story, they should be held accountable.
AgCat93 said:ABATTBQ11 said:AgBQ-00 said:
My guess is this is some one trying to do the Randolf approach. Which has been shot down time and again.
Apparently he was suing the University at one point because he sent a transcript for a chapter or introduction in a book he was writing on Gill to someone for review, and years later the guy published it to an A&M media relations page almost verbatim without crediting him. They took it down immediately after he complained, but it was spread far enough that he claimed he couldn't publish the book anymore.
Just one small payback after 100+ years of sip stealing idea after idea after idea from whoever.
AgDotCom said:That's what I thought this story was about. And agreed, you've gotta be a whole lotta stupid or dickless to pass someone's work along as your own, whether intentionally or dumbassedly.33 said:
Now, if those guys copied and published the story, they should be held accountable.
Just figures. you guys are so stinking jealous of us these days. You can't take not being top dog33 said:West Point Aggie said:
Oh sippies...they try so effin hard!
What's the connection between this story and UT?
Round Rock AG said:Just figures. you guys are so stinking jealous of us these days. You can't take not being top dog33 said:West Point Aggie said:
Oh sippies...they try so effin hard!
What's the connection between this story and UT?
Agreed.SchizoAg said:
If the story was fake, then E. King Kill himself was a huge liar, and all of his contemporaries (many of whom listened to his 1964 Muster speech) were gullible fools. There was never any controversy about it during his lifetime.
https://www.aggienetwork.com/news/152458/listen-audio-resurfaces-of-gill-telling-12th-man-story/
Know how I know it's true? Because it's not even that great of a story. He suited up and stood ready to enter the game if called upon. But it would have made a much better story if he had entered the game.
SchizoAg said:
If the story was fake, then E. King Kill himself was a huge liar, and all of his contemporaries (many of whom listened to his 1964 Muster speech) were gullible fools. There was never any controversy about it during his lifetime.
https://www.aggienetwork.com/news/152458/listen-audio-resurfaces-of-gill-telling-12th-man-story/
Know how I know it's true? Because it's not even that great of a story. He suited up and stood ready to enter the game if called upon. But it would have made a much better story if he had entered the game....after all his teammates threatened to quit, and then he sacked the QB.
The author of the Chronicle story graduated from tu.33 said:West Point Aggie said:
Oh sippies...they try so effin hard!
What's the connection between this story and UT?
Those tu people are so jealous. Article like this are the result. They cannot stand it that A&M surpassed them long ago in University and football status.highlonesomeaggie said:The author of the Chronicle story graduated from tu.33 said:West Point Aggie said:
Oh sippies...they try so effin hard!
What's the connection between this story and UT?
SchizoAg said:
If the story was fake, then E. King Kill himself was a huge liar, and all of his contemporaries (many of whom listened to his 1964 Muster speech) were gullible fools. There was never any controversy about it during his lifetime.
https://www.aggienetwork.com/news/152458/listen-audio-resurfaces-of-gill-telling-12th-man-story/
Know how I know it's true? Because it's not even that great of a story. He suited up and stood ready to enter the game if called upon. But it would have made a much better story if he had entered the game.
AgBQ-00 said:
Thanks still blocks me though. Will try on other articles though