Good decade, Horns!

4,471 Views | 28 Replies | Last: 4 yr ago by Humorous Username
BohunkAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
stick93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
But, but they play 10 "P5" opponents and we only play 9.
33
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yep. The Horns were terrible during that time period.
AgOutsideAustin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
54 wins and "we're back" every year.
Tom Doniphon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"Blue Bloods"
BoomGoesThe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
33 said:

Yep. The Horns were terrible during that time period.


Were the Horns terrible during the 80's and 90's as well? A&M has had more wins in 3 of the last 4 decades.
KerrvilleAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BoomGoesThe said:

33 said:

Yep. The Horns were terrible during that time period.


Were the Horns terrible during the 80's and 90's as well? A&M has had more wins in 3 of the last 4 decades.


Shhhhhh......just let them believe how dominant they are
Post removed:
by user
HeyMoe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So what happened back in 2010, you sip scrotes?

Oh, yeah. You showed everyone who was boss in the aftermath of conference realignment; got your own network and all, most of the money and all the clout in your own pet conference.

Yeah, you sure made THAT pay off.
33
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BoomGoesThe said:

33 said:

Yep. The Horns were terrible during that time period.


Were the Horns terrible during the 80's and 90's as well? A&M has had more wins in 3 of the last 4 decades.
The 80's and 90's were better for the Horns than the last decade. The early 80's were good and the latter 80's were bad The opposite was true of the 90's.

I've long said that A&M is a more consistent performer. A&M beats opponents that they are supposed to beat (usually). The Horns have higher highs and lower lows (like losing to Kansas).

e=mc2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Tom Doniphon said:

"Blue Bloods"
More like "Blue Balls!" Amirite?
Callate Donnie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Memory Lane:

2010 - 5-7
2011 - 8-5
2012 - 9-4
2013 - 8-5
2014 - 6-7
2015 - 5-7
2016 - 5-7
2017 - 7-6
2018 - 10-4
2019 - 8-5

Win % - .555
TXAGBQ76
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
LOL; the term blue blood and tu should never be used in the same sentence, paragraph, chapter or book
TXAGBQ76
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Admitting you suck is the first step to recovery
digging tunnels
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
33 said:

BoomGoesThe said:

33 said:

Yep. The Horns were terrible during that time period.


Were the Horns terrible during the 80's and 90's as well? A&M has had more wins in 3 of the last 4 decades.
The 80's and 90's were better for the Horns than the last decade. The early 80's were good and the latter 80's were bad The opposite was true of the 90's.

I've long said that A&M is a more consistent performer. A&M beats opponents that they are supposed to beat (usually). The Horns have higher highs and lower lows (like losing to Kansas).




It's because We're Texas and other opponents get more motivated to play us and are their super bowl, so we get their best /sip
porchdawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Y'all know they have to play that murderer's row in the BDF every year! It takes such a toll on them...
ABATTBQ11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
porchdawg said:

Y'all know they have to play that murderer's row in the BDF every year! It takes such a toll on them...


And there was that home/home against mighty Maryland
Muy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Callate Donnie said:

Memory Lane:

2010 - 5-7
2011 - 8-5
2012 - 9-4
2013 - 8-5
2014 - 6-7
2015 - 5-7
2016 - 5-7
2017 - 7-6
2018 - 10-4
2019 - 8-5

Win % - .555


40% of their seasons were losing seasons.
33
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BQ_90
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Muy said:

Callate Donnie said:

Memory Lane:

2010 - 5-7
2011 - 8-5
2012 - 9-4
2013 - 8-5
2014 - 6-7
2015 - 5-7
2016 - 5-7
2017 - 7-6
2018 - 10-4
2019 - 8-5

Win % - .555


40% of their seasons were losing seasons.
power bottom indeed
Texas Yarddog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Pretty impressive considering they were forever young this past decade...
Jack Squat 83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I think their average recruiting ranking was around 50-55% too, right?
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Looking forward to the first pre-season poll picking them top 10 again.
WC94
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Would be interesting to know what the pre season ranking were every year of the decade.
KerrvilleAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Most undeveloped players and most under performing to preseason rankings.

Bwhaaaaa.....since recruiting was normalized and TAMU accepted women (in other words a level playing field) the only thing they've done better is won the MNC once (but Radio's knee was down) cheating refs and all, they are just the Jones's
Muy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Texas Yarddog said:

Pretty impressive considering they were forever young this past decade...


The Benjamin Buttons of college football.
TxAg2009WC
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
nortex97 said:

Looking forward to the first pre-season poll picking them top 10 again.
Some have already come out with them ranked # 14.
mulch
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Sips record against conference opponents over the last decade....yikes.

BU 5-5

ISU 6-4

KU 8-1

KSU 5-5

OU 3-8

OSU 3-7

TCU 2-6

TTU 8-2

WVU 4-4

AGGIES 1-1

UN 1-0

MIZZOU 0-1


Overall 46-44
33
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Texas and Texas A&M are like stock disclaimers -> Past performance is not an indication of future results.


Hopefully.
Humorous Username
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
WC94 said:

Would be interesting to know what the pre season ranking were every year of the decade.


Final ranking is in parentheses.

2010: 6 (NR)
2011: NR (NR)
2012: 9 (19)
2013: 9 (NR)
2014: 20 (NR)
2015: NR (NR)
2016: NR (NR)
2017: 22 (NR)
2018: 17 (9)

http://preseason.stassen.com/over-under/

EDIT: Mot sure what the hell happened in the off-season between 2011 and 2012, but to be ranked 9th after finishing unranked is pure media stupidity.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.