PAC-12 or Independent?
Andy Farmer said:
SEC.
But probably Southland.
Rosy Finch Boy said:
I think eventually the texoma four (tu, ou, osu, tech/tcu) go pac12 because that conference needs more central time zone games.
I think the interesting fight is going to be between tcu and tech for that last spot. tech has more political clout but tcu probably offers more overall.
i would definitely like to see this happen.aggiehawg said:
If were tech, I would be schmoozing the Texas teams in the AAC, UofH and SMU to be favorable to them joining along with TCU. AAC only has twelve teams currently.
CUSA is at 14 teams with four from Texas: UNT, UTEP, UTSA and Rice. Might not be room for them.
The days of the sips making demands for tagalongs to the PAC 12 are over. Nor do I think Larry Scott remains commissioner much longer since the way he set up their conference network has bombed just as spectacularly as the LHN.
Besides Powers is gone from tu. He was tech's protector and this will be a crisis time when the GOR expires. Every school for themselves.
Most likely outcome? Big XII boots Bowlsby, expands to 14, sips play nice with a conference network and the Big XII survives.
Bo Darville said:Andy Farmer said:
SEC.
But probably Southland.
I like how the realistic options scare the **** out of you and you're forced to hide behind an attempt at humor.
SEC has no use for further expansion. B1G might but again, have no need that either tu or the Sooners really bring to the table, not to mention the required buy-in to the BTN. That's a big pill to swallow and getting larger every year.Quote:
i see ou making a bunch of noise. especially if the SEC or Big 10 are making plays to add them to their conferences. how does ut entice them to stay? a tiered big 12 network payout? split profits 30%-30%-the other 40% divided between the other schools? it's a tricky situation.
Why not? What do they really bring to the table?M.D. said:
Seriously doubt Tech would get kicked down to a non-power 5 league.
But weirder sh*t has happened so who knows.
aggiehawg said:Why not? What do they really bring to the table?M.D. said:
Seriously doubt Tech would get kicked down to a non-power 5 league.
But weirder sh*t has happened so who knows.
TV sets and eyeballs are not the business models they once were, if we are talking conference networks. So I'm not sure which criteria would be appropriate to use. More about fit and geography, to me.Wildcat said:
Where do you find 4 schools that take the Big XII to 14 and add value? Houston maybe, but they are already in Texas and don't add a new market.
Memphis?
Colorado State?
Look east and build around WVU?
I don't really see a lot of options that look anything like P5 additions.
aggiehawg said:TV sets and eyeballs are not the business models they once were, if we are talking conference networks. So I'm not sure which criteria would be appropriate to use. More about fit and geography, to me.Wildcat said:
Where do you find 4 schools that take the Big XII to 14 and add value? Houston maybe, but they are already in Texas and don't add a new market.
Memphis?
Colorado State?
Look east and build around WVU?
I don't really see a lot of options that look anything like P5 additions.
UofH, Memphis, Cincy maybe the largest of the Louisiana directional schools? The point is survival and making the best of a piss-poor situation.
The alternative is disbanding of the Big XII and everyone for themselves with not enough chairs to go around for everybody.
aggiehawg said:TV sets and eyeballs are not the business models they once were, if we are talking conference networks. So I'm not sure which criteria would be appropriate to use. More about fit and geography, to me.Wildcat said:
Where do you find 4 schools that take the Big XII to 14 and add value? Houston maybe, but they are already in Texas and don't add a new market.
Memphis?
Colorado State?
Look east and build around WVU?
I don't really see a lot of options that look anything like P5 additions.
UofH, Memphis, Cincy maybe the largest of the Louisiana directional schools? The point is survival and making the best of a piss-poor situation.
The alternative is disbanding of the Big XII and everyone for themselves with not enough chairs to go around for everybody.
SEC is not taking anyone else. No advantage in doing so.Agvet12 said:
SEC will grab either Kansas (rival for UK in B-ball and an easy win in the W) or grab OU (who I think joins the B1G).
Tech goes MW, UVW goes ACC while SECe steals one from them... to balance it out.
Texas goes PAC12, and could take Tech or TCU with. My guess is TCU is the better option.
Baylol sues to go P12, fails and ends up in the AAC.
OKSt rides OU's coattails to the B1G and Kstate/ Iowa St end up in MW
Say it with me: THEY DON'T WANT YOU.Quote:
If it's about fit and geography then the PAC 12 is where we'll end up.
Who says the Big 12 is disbanding anyway?
I'm not sure tu can strike the same deal that Notre Dame has with the ACC, not without a network partner like Notre Dame has with NBC. LHN won't cut it as a "network partner." What value would that bring to the conference taking a partial member?Burt Macklin, FBI said:
No way the Pac ever agrees to allow a private Christian school in the conference, so Baylor and TCU are out. That's why Utah got in over BYU.
tu (if they don't go independent), OU, and Kansas will land in a good conference in the next round of realignment. TCU, WVU, and possibly K State MIGHT end up somewhere good depending on how everything shakes out. Everyone else is pretty much boned.