SEC dominates Power 5 in 2016 revenues

2,446 Views | 20 Replies | Last: 6 yr ago by RikkiTikkaTagem
MSU/SECALUM
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:11p, 5/20/17
https://www.saturdaydownsouth.com/sec-football/sec-dominates-power-5-2016-revenues/

Reply Quote
4
DifferenceMaker Ag
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:31p, 5/20/17
Reply Quote
8
coolerguy12
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
1:19a, 5/21/17
AG
That number appears to be double the BDF. No way that is right.
Reply Quote
17
BiochemAg97
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to coolerguy12 • 5:56a, 5/21/17
AG
coolerguy12 said:
That number appears to be double the BDF. No way that is right.
Well we do have more school, certainly that accounts for the difference.
Reply Quote
8
Maroon Dawn
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:26a, 5/21/17
AG
Redneck accounting

Don't they know that the school that sells the mostest t-shirts ever is in the BDF?!?!
Reply Quote
11
aggiehawg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:17a, 5/21/17
AG
A short seven years ago, A&M was arguing with the Big XII about conference revenues in the piddly 20 million range for A&M. Remember the "Beebe Bucks" required to get there??

That was in June-July of 2010. We didn't get to the SEC until the 2012 season.

For the millionth time, THANK YOU, BOWTIE!!!
Reply Quote
45
Madman
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:45a, 5/21/17
AG
How did Texas A&M convince the SEC lawyers and managers to lie about that much money.
Reply Quote
13
DOG XO 84
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:39a, 5/21/17
AG
In reply to AH, the year before the $20MM we were talking about 10MM for TV money. Only got 20MM in order to "save" the BDF. Even then the sips and Sooners tried to browbeat us out of the $
Reply Quote
15
petey88
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
1:15p, 5/21/17

noticed none of the resident sips or Bearkats are touching this one
Reply Quote
6
DatTallArchitect
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
2:02p, 5/21/17
AG
Is that pac12 figure a typo? Very surprised to see them in the #2 spot
Reply Quote
Maroon Dawn
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
3:28p, 5/21/17
AG
The PAC is deceptive because of their lack of great FB success since the Carroll days at USC but having a virtual monopoly on major college sports TV west of the Rockies (particularly now that the MWC is a shadow of its former self when BYU/Utah/TCU were members) has its advantages
Reply Quote
4
1 edit
aggiehawg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Maroon Dawn • 8:15p, 5/21/17
AG
Maroon Dawn said:
The PAC is deceptive because of their lack of great FB success since the Carroll days at USC but having a virtual monopoly on major college sports TV west of the Rockies (particularly now that the MWC is a shadow of its former self when BYU/Utah/TCU were members) has its advantages
The PAC numbers are skewed when looking at revenue only. They bear the expenses too since the PACN is owned by the conference. Actual profit is far less.
Reply Quote
6
BESCo91
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to aggiehawg • 11:52a, 5/22/17
AG
aggiehawg said:
Maroon Dawn said:
The PAC is deceptive because of their lack of great FB success since the Carroll days at USC but having a virtual monopoly on major college sports TV west of the Rockies (particularly now that the MWC is a shadow of its former self when BYU/Utah/TCU were members) has its advantages
The PAC numbers are skewed when looking at revenue only. They bear the expenses too since the PACN is owned by the conference. Actual profit is far less.
Exactly ....

"Revenue, of course, does not equal payouts and distribution after expenses, the subject of multiple tweets in reply to Fischer. This point came up in his explaining why the Pac-12 brings in more revenue, but the Big Ten is more profitable. The Pac-12 revenue number is more because they are running their own TV network. After expenses, the B1G far, far ahead. " - SaturdayDownSouth article in OP
Reply Quote
2 edits
MaterialAg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
1:17p, 5/22/17
AG
It's been fun watching this backfire so mightily on the sips and (to a lesser extent) okies.
Reply Quote
9
PJYoung
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to MaterialAg • 1:25p, 5/22/17
AG
MaterialAg said:
It's been fun watching this backfire so mightily on the sips and (to a lesser extent) okies.

To say the least.
Reply Quote
leftcoastaggie
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
1:35p, 5/22/17
AG
Fiscal year 2015 school distributions
SEC: $32.7 million
Big Ten: $32.4 million
Pac-12: $25.1 million
Big 12: 23.4 million

Fiscal year 2016 school distributions
SEC: $40.5 million
Big Ten: $34.8 million
Pac-12: $28.7 million
Big 12: $28.45 million
Reply Quote
2
BiochemAg97
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to leftcoastaggie • 3:22p, 5/22/17
AG
leftcoastaggie said:
Fiscal year 2015 school distributions
SEC: $32.7 million
Big Ten: $32.4 million
Pac-12: $25.1 million
Big 12: 23.4 million

Fiscal year 2016 school distributions
SEC: $40.5 million
Big Ten: $34.8 million
Pac-12: $28.7 million
Big 12: $28.45 million


Doesn't matter, sips have LHN money (that they split with IMG and academics and still a few years away from the $15mil/yr mark)
Reply Quote
1
TPS_Report
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:41a, 5/23/17
AG
There is one reason, and one reason only that the SEC is able to command that kind of caish... Texas A&M. Our entry into the League doubled the SEC TV footprint.

If we were like the GD sips we would piss and moan and bully to try to get a bigger share of the pie. That's why those turds should never be allowed in. They are a cancer.
Reply Quote
9
realestateguru
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to TPS_Report • 3:05p, 5/23/17
AG
TPS_Report said:
There is one reason, and one reason only that the SEC is able to command that kind of caish... Texas A&M. Our entry into the League doubled the SEC TV footprint.

If we were like the GD sips we would piss and moan and bully to try to get a bigger share of the pie. That's why those turds should never be allowed in. They are a cancer.

Stop your silliness
Reply Quote
wbt5845
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
3:08p, 5/23/17
AG
So for 2016, now even Vanderbilt makes more from its Tier I+II+III content than Texas? Just wow.
Reply Quote
1
BESCo91
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to TPS_Report • 3:22p, 5/23/17
AG
TPS_Report said:

That's why those turds should never be allowed in.
They are a cancer.
They won't ever be allowed in.
Yes, they are.
Reply Quote
2
RikkiTikkaTagem
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to wbt5845 • 4:32p, 5/23/17
AG
wbt5845 said:
So for 2016, now even Vanderbilt makes more from its Tier I+II+III content than Texas? Just wow.


As predicted by numerous posters on this board several years ago
Reply Quote
1
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.