Man, this is just a level of lunacy that I've never seen. Sips, tards, bammers, no one has stooped to this level.

"Meanwhile, at Baylor University.........."

baylor grads you should be so proud

you are terrible, your school is terrible

keep putting your name out there dumbasses

The State Bar might want to know who is doing this.

BESCo91 said:

---

Bo .... I can't see what you posted ..... could you please just type the tweet (or whatever it is) out?

---

Brenda Tracy tweeted that some lawyer (presumably from Baylor) is submitting open record requests to government agencies to dig up information on her. She is a critic of the way Baylor handled the women who were raped at Baylor.

This ain't lunacy. This is sickening.

CJS4715 said:

---

Probably the same dude who had the twitter account and website (I think) a few months back that was trying to discredit victims.

---

Sounds like witness intimidation to me..

Anyone love irony as much as me?

Can the identities of FOIA requesters be withheld under the FOIA?

No, not as a general rule. As one court has held, "FOIA requesters . . . have no general expectation that their names will be kept private." Agee v. CIA, 1 GDS 80,213 at 80,532 (D.D.C. 1980). In fact, in most cases the release of the name of a FOIA requester would not cause even the minimal invasion of privacy required to trigger the balancing tests of Exemptions 6 and 7(C). See Stauss v. IRS, 516 F. Supp. 1218, 1223 (D.D.C. 1981); cf. National Western Life Insurance Co. v. United States, 512 F. Supp. 454, 460-61 (N.D. Tex. 1980); compare Wine Hobby USA, Inc. v. IRS, 502 F.2d 133, 137 (3d Cir. 1974). It would take an extraordinarily rare and compelling situation for the mere identification of a person or entity as a FOIA requester of particular records to rise to the level of implicating a privacy interest (or, less likely, a commercial interest) protectible under the FOIA.

https://www.justice.gov/oip/blog/foia-update-foia-counselor-questions-answers-15

One of you Twitterers ask Miss Tracy to send you what she knows, whatever prompted her tweet in the OP of this thread.

We'll just send a request to all of those entities that he requested to find out who the requester is.

Then the OR board can take it from there.

Do what you do and what not and what have you.

She knows who it is, but hasn't named him based on advice from her attorney. My guess is her attorney is telling him to cut the crap or we will go public.