It does not matter expedited, etc. It is a binary problem. Either contribute 100% or not. One is a better asset class than the other.Ragoo said:we are talking about expedited payments, not zero payments.dantes said:
Also, if the loan was not paid off, the interest would compound at 8% for 30 years vs 7% for the investment. Should be pretty apparent what the better decision is ex tax shields. Would you rather invest at 7 or 8%?
Basically, the answer (excluding inflation, individual taxes etc since those are all unique) is to put 100% towards the -8% debt and then contribute to the 7% thereafter
Model it out- it will be apparent