This year more than any other may separate the haves from the have nots financially.
Why not? He would be a good asset to make sure the bats are clean.RO519 said:
Please no Puig.
Ag_07 said:
The good news is that in the current climate no one is gonna give a closer a long big contract.
Or he is just spreading the rona to everyone...n_touch said:Why not? He would be a good asset to make sure the bats are clean.RO519 said:
Please no Puig.
I am far from a Puig fan, but this is the type of cheap signing that small-market teams make. He's still an above-average hitter who isn't a liability in the OF. As long as you have the clubhouse to deal with his personality, he can be a cheap asset that produces.RO519 said:
Please no Puig.
Yeah.Deluxe said:
I agree with both takes
Quote:
Most teams appear to view the prospect of making the present club better as a luxury that can only be entertained if those maneuvers don't damage some future version of the club.
I'd be happy with this.Ag4life80 said:
I'm gonna go with doing whatever it takes to resign Brantley, then sign Marisnik, and use Tyler Naquin as my cheap Reddick replacement.
same here. I'll still wear my Springer jersey since he did nothing to lose our respect. Maybe one day he will come back and retire as an AstroKashchei said:
I'm still sad about George leaving. He was the team's spark plug and my favorite all time Stro.
I don't remember the full timeline, but was Lunhow fired before any real contract negotiations could happen? Hard for Click to come on board in the early spring and offer a contract right away.W said:
regarding Springer...
when he did not get extended last offseason...that was the sign...the Astros were not going to pay him.
the Astros extend the players they want to keep