themissinglink said:
iBrad said:
According to this site:
- Runner on 2nd with no outs = 61.4% chance the run scores
- Runner on 3rd with one out = 66.0% chance the run scores
Now you have to factor in the success rate of the sacrifice, because it's not a sure thing, no matter how much you practice. That likely negates much of the above advantage.
You also have to factor in situational defense, which further negates the advantage. This article details how playing the infield in can reduce the scoring percentage for the runner on third. The 66% above was a cumulative percentage over five seasons. This is likely much lower when isolating for run-preventing defensive alignments.
All that to say, our nerds have likely analyzed the numbers to determine the best approach to winning, which is likely not bunting.
Yep...buckle up for game cancellations and shortened 7 inning games. Going to become the norm pretty soonagdaddy04 said:
With the new doubleheader rule I bet this happens a lot.
I agree. If we get to the playoffs and the ALCS-NLCS matchups are the teams we thought would be there anyway at close to full strength it might help my perception of it a little bit, but it feels like this is about to get weird.k20dub said:
I didn't think so before the season, but this year's champion will absolutely have an asterisk.
k20dub said:
I didn't think so before the season, but this year's champion will absolutely have an asterisk.
tjack16 said:k20dub said:
I didn't think so before the season, but this year's champion will absolutely have an asterisk.
Not according to Joc Pederson who claims they will have earned it by not cheating
That quote in no way will come back to bite him later
I think it would be funnier if they make it and lose to us again03_Aggie said:tjack16 said:k20dub said:
I didn't think so before the season, but this year's champion will absolutely have an asterisk.
Not according to Joc Pederson who claims they will have earned it by not cheating
That quote in no way will come back to bite him later
Would be funny if the Dodgers actually manage to win one and people asterisk it because of the virus.
mathguy86 said:
So I thought a positive test and the player sat but the team played. Soto tested positive The day of game 1 and he's been sitting while the Nats have been playing. Why is this any different?.
Something tells me it's more than 1 to postpone a game.
So are we playing a baseball season or are the games secondary to the game of not catching Covid?mathguy86 said:mathguy86 said:
So I thought a positive test and the player sat but the team played. Soto tested positive The day of game 1 and he's been sitting while the Nats have been playing. Why is this any different?.
Something tells me it's more than 1 to postpone a game.
And I win. Cards have multiple positives per https://www.espn.com/mlb/story/_/id/29570869/source-mlb-calls-cardinals-brewers-game-due-coronavirus
If you do something stupid and bring a world of horrible media coverage to your employer at what is supposed to be a celebratory time, you'd better be the Babe Ruth of your job if you don't want to get fired.astros4545 said:
Crane somewhat supports free speech
Of course it's a joke that Taubman got fired if he was good at his job
There's usually an insurance policy tied to it, I believe. I remember back when Bagwell had his shoulder surgery, there was a hubbub about the Astros claiming the policy when he intended to (and did) return. Not sure how it would apply in terms of luxury tax, though.Deluxe said:
Might be a dumb question but if JV somehow did have to miss the 2021 season with TJ, would we still owe him his $33mm and would that count against our luxury tax?
Nuke LaLoosh said:
Crane sucks.
Feel like there are going to be a couple of teams in that situation in the future given some of the huge contracts that have been throw around the past couple of years.W said:
regarding the luxury tax...according to Spotrac...
Sale & Pedrioa are costing the Red Sox $38 MM this year toward the luxury tax.
I don't think there's a break for injured players.
----
and looking at Spotrac closer...the Red Sox have a complete mess on their hands payroll-wise. No wonder they had to dump Price & Betts. Will take them a couple of years to shed/expire the bad contracts
Ag_07 said:
Exactly and that's why I don't think they can afford George.
Someone will come throw money at him but I don't think it'll be Boston