One sip with a brain? Statistically, it had to happen. OU, probably never.
Presented with a fait accompli, A&M's pusillanimous regents rubber stamped the decision rather than risk losing face by being overruled. They "shoulda listened" to 95% of all Aggies. They could have invoked the "gentlemen's agreement". Faced with the prospect of an acrimonious, protracted, public dispute, probably enough other members of the conference would have balked that the whole thing would have been stopped.33 said:"...shoulda listened!!"West Point Aggie said:33 said:West Point Aggie said:33 said:
I am not a supporter of Texas joining the SEC. It has nothing to do with winning or losing.
I don't think that Texas is a good fit for the SEC.
You're a good fit all by yourself…you don't belong in a conference with others.
You don't know me.
Not will I ever, though I was addressing your GD school and AD…that should not have been that hard to figure out. Your AD is not to be trusted…ever…for ANY reason. The rest of the SEC will figure that out soon enough and Aggies, pigs and Mizzou tigers will get a good laugh when the rest start complaining…shoulda listened!!
You people literally are the WORST POSSIBLE partner…period!
A&M voted to approve Texas coming into the SEC. Looks like the other schools did listen.
Again, and for the record, I am not a supporter of Texas in the SEC.