Texas A&M Football
Sponsored by

Just reported: Missouri AD resigns

11,538 Views | 55 Replies | Last: 3 yr ago by The Lost
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
No reason given, yet.
Aggieair
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bill Superman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Sharp's up next!
Bockaneer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
for principles or integrity (or lack thereof)
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Bill Superman said:

Sharp's up next!
Hopefully.
black_ice
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The WAR begins
W
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
he has seen the pods
LatinAggie1997
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Bill Superman said:

Sharp's up next!


That would be awesome,
Firing him would erotic!
dixichkn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
LatinAggie1997 said:

Bill Superman said:

Sharp's up next!


That would be awesome,
Firing him would erotic!

At least borderline so.......
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
LatinAggie1997 said:

Bill Superman said:

Sharp's up next!


That would be awesome,
Firing him would erotic!
I believe the actual quote was "borderline erotic."

ETA: Dang it! Beat to the punch.
The Lost
How long do you want to ignore this user?
putting money on him taking the UCF job, the president there is who hired him at mizzou and i think its more home to him. i think it was only expected he'd be there a few more years due to age.

While he technically hired drink who the fans like now, the process was a **** show and the boc overrode his first person he wanted hired.

May not like the NIL stuff/conference change/current president
PyriteAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Oh boy
whytho987654
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Lost said:

putting money on him taking the UCF job, the president there is who hired him at mizzou and i think its more home to him. i think it was only expected he'd be there a few more years due to age.

While he technically hired drink who the fans like now, the process was a **** show and the boc overrode his first person he wanted hired.

May not like the NIL stuff/conference change/current president
or he may try to push ucf into the sec. Mizzou has a strong hatred towards uf, I think I'd be hilarious
Aggieair
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'd be for it just for the laughs and to spite UF. And their national co-champions, Bama.
LatinAggie1997
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

LatinAggie1997 said:

Bill Superman said:

Sharp's up next!


That would be awesome,
Firing him would erotic!
I believe the actual quote was "borderline erotic."

ETA: Dang it! Beat to the punch.



Yeah, I forgot the actual quote and wanted to get my response in quickly.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
LatinAggie1997 said:

aggiehawg said:

LatinAggie1997 said:

Bill Superman said:

Sharp's up next!


That would be awesome,
Firing him would erotic!
I believe the actual quote was "borderline erotic."

ETA: Dang it! Beat to the punch.



Yeah, I forgot the actual quote and wanted to get my response in quickly.
Hubs and I were at that game. It was fun.

I do miss Bielema though. He was funny. Even when he didn't intend to be.

ToddyHill
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Just my wild guess...he and the Administration don't agree with Missouri's decision.
Nino Brown
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm telling you. He wanted to stay in the SEC and Big 10 just offered Mizzou, where the high ups want them to be. It's gonna be a wild next 24 months.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Nino Brown said:

I'm telling you. He wanted to stay in the SEC and Big 10 just offered Mizzou, where the high ups want them to be. It's gonna be a wild next 24 months.
Wait, what? If that is the "power move" the B1G commish chose, he's toast. He had tu and ou on board and gets Mizzoo in exchange? No.

Fox Sports is in charge. They don't want Mizzoo. Makes little financial sense.
hunter2012
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Nino Brown
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg said:

Nino Brown said:

I'm telling you. He wanted to stay in the SEC and Big 10 just offered Mizzou, where the high ups want them to be. It's gonna be a wild next 24 months.
Wait, what? If that is the "power move" the B1G commish chose, he's toast. He had tu and ou on board and gets Mizzoo in exchange? No.

Fox Sports is in charge. They don't want Mizzoo. Makes little financial sense.
Well Big 10 ain't taking OU. So I think it's a power move and they're trying to **** up the amount of teams in the SEC. Would put SEC back at 15 and then SEC would have to go poach ACC. Forcing Texas to make a decsion about leaving OU or not and gets them another AAU school and St. Louis market. With Kansas and Iowa State on the way Big 10 and SEC are gonna keep playing this for a few more years.

Big 10 and SEC are playing 3 D chess to get rid of Big 12 and ACC and establish two Super Conferfences and see what PAC does. Been going on for a long time.
Nino Brown
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg said:

Nino Brown said:

I'm telling you. He wanted to stay in the SEC and Big 10 just offered Mizzou, where the high ups want them to be. It's gonna be a wild next 24 months.
Wait, what? If that is the "power move" the B1G commish chose, he's toast. He had tu and ou on board and gets Mizzoo in exchange? No.

Fox Sports is in charge. They don't want Mizzoo. Makes little financial sense.
And no, it is a power move. Due to the fact that once SEC tampers with ACC, Clemson and Florida State, then there goes Virginia, UNC, Duke, Georgia Tech and Pitt into the Big 10. That's 5 AAU schools into new markets. Not the football schools necessarily that SEC looks at but Big 10 keeps it's academic standards and adds has much revenue has possible.
Aginnebraska
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Wouldn't it be just like the 'horns to be playing the SEC and Big10 against each other for a better conference deal?
MyAggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Maryland is already in the B1G, just sayin'
Buford T. Justice
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Keep your eyes on this situation.
Do your google research.
Bunk Moreland
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Every poster who continues to repeat networks being 'in charge' or responsible for these moves is so ass backwards in their thinking and should not be taken seriously.

ESPN is not influencing Texas and OU wanting to join the sec and fox has no influence on anything either.
Nino Brown
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MyAggie said:

Maryland is already in the B1G, just sayin'
Sorry, I just meant Pitt, AAU member. Had Maryland on my mind because I've heard that's the possible play Maryland being old rivals of the ACC teams being added. Also gets them into Georgia with Georgia Tech or forces SEC to take them back after they left in 64. Georgia Tech was pretty damn good before leaving and now you'd have Ohio State and Michigan in the deep south recruiting more. 3D chess and yes I believe they're approaching Mizzou to **** **** up or SEC has to vote no to Texas.
Evanhue
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Sips are already wrecking the conference before they even get here.
counter subconscious espionage
Charlie 31
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
W said:

he has seen the pods
4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Evanhue said:

Sips are already wrecking the conference before they even get here.

Yep. The SEC truly has no idea what kind of trouble they are inviting in the back door.

They actually believe that Texas will join the conference and just submit themselves nicely to equal status with the other schools.

The ONLY good part about this will be getting the chance to say, "I told you so" to the rest of the league.

They've got no clue what's about to happen.
Rebel Yell
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
4 said:

Evanhue said:

Sips are already wrecking the conference before they even get here.

Yep. The SEC truly has no idea what kind of trouble they are inviting in the back door.

They actually believe that Texas will join the conference and just submit themselves nicely to equal status with the other schools.

The ONLY good part about this will be getting the chance to say, "I told you so" to the rest of the league.

They've got no clue what's about to happen.
Ironically in the long run we will be one of the least impacted SEC teams.
“I don’t even sit on the left side of church”
The Agly Duckling
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aginnebraska said:

Wouldn't it be just like the 'horns to be playing the SEC and Big10 against each other for a better conference deal?

There is so much truth in this post it's scary.
Divining Rod
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rebel Yell said:

4 said:

Evanhue said:

Sips are already wrecking the conference before they even get here.

Yep. The SEC truly has no idea what kind of trouble they are inviting in the back door.

They actually believe that Texas will join the conference and just submit themselves nicely to equal status with the other schools.

The ONLY good part about this will be getting the chance to say, "I told you so" to the rest of the league.

They've got no clue what's about to happen.
Ironically in the long run we will be one of the least impacted SEC teams.


underrated post by rebel!
Bluecat_Aggie94
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Nino Brown said:

Big 10 and SEC are playing 3 D chess to get rid of Big 12 and ACC and establish two Super Conferfences and see what PAC does. Been going on for a long time.

Seems like you'd want to end up with 2 or 4, not three conferences, right?
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Bunk Moreland said:

Every poster who continues to repeat networks being 'in charge' or responsible for these moves is so ass backwards in their thinking and should not be taken seriously.

ESPN is not influencing Texas and OU wanting to join the sec and fox has no influence on anything either.
You are so wrong. Golden Rule: He who has the gold, makes the rules. The conferences have content that they sell and it's a limited buyer's market and has been since college ball first started to be televised.

Some of that is changing as streaming services come into more use but there are still high production costs for live content.

The media partners make investments into the conferences. They understandably want to protect and make those investments thrive. Of course they have a seat at the table and can pull strings behind the scenes.

In 2010, it was the Boys in Bristol identifying Dodds' weak point, his all consuming desire for the school network. Dangling that before him put the kibosh on the PAC deal. Why did ESPN not want the Big XII to fold and watch the big five leave for the PAC (or us to the SEC)? Because at the time, the PAC was a Fox Sports property.

And this round of realignment was kicked off by two things. Last August, ESPN shut down all studio shows on the LHN, effectively shuttering the place. The LHN was dead. That freed tu up to look around without that albatross. Then the media partners wanted the GOR extended for ten years. Then they passed on early negotiations for the next media contracts. It was clear to everybody that the next contract would be a reduction in money, the same or a very modest increase, at best. The Big XII had reached their peak value and were still behind.

For whatever reason, CBS decided they were getting out of the college football business and didn't vigorously bid on the new SEC contract. So ESPN won that contract. No more 2:30 CBS SEC games come 2025. ESPN has all rights to the SEC content after then (or maybe sooner.)
Page 1 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.