Does anyone know where to find college football game charts? I started trying to chart a&m games last season but would love to see a well done version.

What kind of charts?

shart?

https://secstatcat.com/

Charts out passes, runs, catches in detail as in catchable passes missed opportunities etc. if that what your looking for. All though many here probably won't like it because it because it uses facts and numbers to show what are actual weakness is. Hint it isn't Mond

Let me know if I translated correctly?


-Mond was sacked significantly more/attempt than the average SEC QB
-Monds WRs dropped sligltly less than average
-Mond threw slightly more than average # of uncatchable balls
-Mond's completion % and accuracy % were above average
-Offense well below average at creating explosive plays

=Mond was an above average SEC passer


-Q, Rodgers and Buckley well below average in catch %
-Ausbon and Wydermeyer were well above
-Wydermeyer and Buckley only recevers good in YAC
-Ausbon and Rodgers horrendous in YAC
-Q below avg but not terrible at YAC

-Wydermeyer was double average at creating explosive plays
-Ausbon was average
-Q and Buckley were below average
-Rodgers was far below average


=Ausbon was a solid, complimentary player
=Q was overrated
=Rodgers was even less productive than I realized
=Buckley was not a huge drop off from Q

This explains why Jimbo did not process Buckley.

SattlerAggie said:

---

https://secstatcat.com/

Charts out passes, runs, catches in detail as in catchable passes missed opportunities etc. if that what your looking for. All though many here probably won't like it because it because it uses facts and numbers to show what are actual weakness is. Hint it isn't Mond

---

Anyone can have an opinion, but performance on the field is what matters.

Mond could not break into the top 50 for passing efficiency last season. Also ties 45th for passing touchdowns.

Passing Effeciency does not consider quality of opponent, quality of WRs, quality of OL.

Only 4 SEC Qbs in the top 50 (technically 3, but Tua would have been #1 if he had enough attempts to qualify). 6 BDF QBs made the top 50. 23 G5 Qbs made it.

Context matters.

Agsuffering@bulaw said:

---

Passing Effeciency does not consider quality of opponent, quality of WRs, quality of OL.

Only 4 SEC Qbs in the top 50 (technically 3, but Tua would have been #1 if he had enough attempts to qualify). 6 BDF QBs made the top 50. 23 G5 Qbs made it.

Context matters.

---

I agree context does matter. Mond with his slow decision making and delivery makes the oline look bad. Defenses clamp down on short and intermediate routes knowing Mond lacks accuracy on deeper throws. Without a deep threat, receivers struggle to create separation. To keep the argument simple, Mond is a mediocre qb and the numbers show it.

The WRs could not get seperation against good defenses and could not be trusted to go out and get it or prevent the INT. Mond's accuracy is good enough with good enough WRs.

The OL was not good enough. With really good pocket presence, maybe half a dozen sacks go away. There were still too many.

Mond is an above average QB who must improve at reading pressure to be upper level. IF he played in the BDF, he would have probably thrown for 3,500 yards and gotten all kinds of attention.

Is there a chart for not getting the play off / having to burn TOs?

Because, all-star material on that.

that stat tracker is garbage, they left out our ONLY strength: punting!