Mond needs to stop looking like a statue.
Now break down how many of those were a direct result of tree growth slow Mond making piss poor decisions, taking 5-6 seconds and subsequently running directly into defensive linemen?Agsuffering@bulaw said:
The schematic breakdowns mostly got fixed. Kenyon and Spiller got better as the season went on. But we still got beat plenty even with correct execution. We led the SEC in sacks/game by a significant margin. We were 2.62. Next was MSU at 2.39, then LSU and Vandy at 2.33, Mizzou at 2.25, SC at 2.08. The rest were under 2.
BCEDAg said:
The two tight end sets with Wydermyer and Cupp should help o- line performance this year.
Based on SEC passing statistics for 2019. Mond was third in yards passing in 2019. .He was right behind Kyle Trask and both of them were miles behind Burrow.samhoustonag said:rootube said:And yet somehow we were one of the best passing teams in the SEC last year. We had a pretty bad offense last year and there was plenty of blame to go around. If we can't protect the QB and run the ball more effectively this year then it won't matter who is our QB.samhoustonag said:Slow reads, slow to work through progression, slow release and a penchant for running headlong into the pressure. Yep, he had issues. Much of the problem was of his own making.rootube said:Just look at the stats. We were worst in the entire SEC in sacks allowed and if you subtract Monds rushing we were second to worst in rushing. Mond may have had issues but he didn't get a lot of help.Detmersdislocatedshoulder said:schmellba99 said:Dude, the line actually pass blocked better than average last season. It's not a case of the line needing to give Mond more time. It's a case of Mond needing to operate faster, make better decisions and not run directly into defensive linemen when he does decide to scramble 6 seconds after the snap.Detmersdislocatedshoulder said:
Has to be offensive line. Better o line play improves running game and gives KM more time which he desperately needs to work through his progressions.
The whole "the offensive line sucked" mentality is the biggest example of message board group think there is. They sucked at run blocking against good teams, but pass blocked pretty solid the entire season.
I will have to disagree with you and not because of group think. I watched the games and saw our offensive line get whooped routinely. We could barely run the ball in the opener against Texas state. against good to very good competition we could not block anyone. I agree with KM needing to process quicker I am definitely not a KM apologist however the O line regressed dramatically in 2019. I saw 2-4 whiffs a game by Kenyon green who is suppose to be our best blocker I saw lineman get pushed straight back into the quarterback and I saw tackles that got exposed if the defensive end they were blocking had any next level ability. We absolutely missed Eric McCoy up the middle. You don't actually believe losing a future pro bowler at center and replacing him with Colton prater is an upgrade, do you? So for those reasons I believe the best way for our team to improve is via improved offensive line play and as I stated earlier for KM to process quicker.
And yet somehow we finished fourth in the West division.
{Also, based on what metric?}
Third.rootube said:Based on SEC passing statistics for 2019. Mond was third in yards passing in 2019. .He was right behind Kyle Trask and both of them were miles behind Burrow.samhoustonag said:rootube said:And yet somehow we were one of the best passing teams in the SEC last year. We had a pretty bad offense last year and there was plenty of blame to go around. If we can't protect the QB and run the ball more effectively this year then it won't matter who is our QB.samhoustonag said:Slow reads, slow to work through progression, slow release and a penchant for running headlong into the pressure. Yep, he had issues. Much of the problem was of his own making.rootube said:Just look at the stats. We were worst in the entire SEC in sacks allowed and if you subtract Monds rushing we were second to worst in rushing. Mond may have had issues but he didn't get a lot of help.Detmersdislocatedshoulder said:schmellba99 said:Dude, the line actually pass blocked better than average last season. It's not a case of the line needing to give Mond more time. It's a case of Mond needing to operate faster, make better decisions and not run directly into defensive linemen when he does decide to scramble 6 seconds after the snap.Detmersdislocatedshoulder said:
Has to be offensive line. Better o line play improves running game and gives KM more time which he desperately needs to work through his progressions.
The whole "the offensive line sucked" mentality is the biggest example of message board group think there is. They sucked at run blocking against good teams, but pass blocked pretty solid the entire season.
I will have to disagree with you and not because of group think. I watched the games and saw our offensive line get whooped routinely. We could barely run the ball in the opener against Texas state. against good to very good competition we could not block anyone. I agree with KM needing to process quicker I am definitely not a KM apologist however the O line regressed dramatically in 2019. I saw 2-4 whiffs a game by Kenyon green who is suppose to be our best blocker I saw lineman get pushed straight back into the quarterback and I saw tackles that got exposed if the defensive end they were blocking had any next level ability. We absolutely missed Eric McCoy up the middle. You don't actually believe losing a future pro bowler at center and replacing him with Colton prater is an upgrade, do you? So for those reasons I believe the best way for our team to improve is via improved offensive line play and as I stated earlier for KM to process quicker.
And yet somehow we finished fourth in the West division.
{Also, based on what metric?}
schmellba99 said:Now break down how many of those were a direct result of tree growth slow Mond making piss poor decisions, taking 5-6 seconds and subsequently running directly into defensive linemen?Agsuffering@bulaw said:
The schematic breakdowns mostly got fixed. Kenyon and Spiller got better as the season went on. But we still got beat plenty even with correct execution. We led the SEC in sacks/game by a significant margin. We were 2.62. Next was MSU at 2.39, then LSU and Vandy at 2.33, Mizzou at 2.25, SC at 2.08. The rest were under 2.
you can't simply throw numbers out without context.
Was our line all world? Nope, and I never claimed it to be. But it also wasn't nearly as bad as the board wanted it to be. You guys see numbers only and point to those, but those numbers hide a lot of the actual facts. The line was better than average at pass blocking, it was ho-hum at best at run blocking (i'd even go so far as to say it was flat bad). The combination of those with a QB that was short bus slow on his reads and decision making lead to more sacks than what should have been. Period.
Nope. Just needed a QB who could complete a pass longer than 10 yards with decent consistency. And get the pass out much more quickly.Agsuffering@bulaw said:
I was not. Our OL was subpar for the SEC. Yes, Mond could help them out w/ better pocket presence.
But, it would take Joe Burrows/JFF level pocket presence to have changed the outcome in any of the losses.
I could not agree more.Detmersdislocatedshoulder said:
Has to be offensive line. Better o line play improves running game and gives KM more time which he desperately needs to work through his progressions.