Anyone care to venture a guess at the starting lineup vs Texas State?
2 DEEP ... Anyone?
7,581 Views |
43 Replies |
Last: 4 yr ago by NeverUse
Is this like your kids yelling from the back seat, "Are we there yet?"
Bet we find out in under 7 days
Foxo said:
2 DEEP ... Anyone?
That's what your mom said
I guess you wouldn't know when the baseball players report either? Thank you for your response. It was very funny.FriscoKid said:
Is this like your kids yelling from the back seat, "Are we there yet?"
On the last interview I saw, Jimbo said he's working on it. Calmate carnal
Wabs said:
So one senior starter of the 22 non specialist starters. And chances are that guy won't be starting by the end of the season. I guess there's reasons to be optimistic about next year. Jim is best recruiting job next year is going to get all of these juniors to come back to win it all next year
I guess Chattman and Renfro are hurt?
Chatmann and Renfro- suspended first game for preemptive targetting penalties they were gping to get called for in first game
So you're telling me we've been dissing Texas for returning just 3 starters on defense while we return the same amount...
Playoff here we come!!!
Playoff here we come!!!
Renfro violation of team rules
Apparently someone got "or" happy. Corbin, Richardson, and Mond (obviously) are starters according to Jimbo. I'm guessing same thing for O'Neal.
Ben is literally the worst.
I mean someone was gonna say it. It's an idiotic typo. 2 deep writer should get all the craptsuag10 said:
Ben is literally the worst.
Also note Demani getting the start over Tucker. Lot's of takeaways from this one. I'm guessing Tucker isn't getting any time off from the taco fight. And Demani is going to be a baller. That or Tucker is losing a start as punishment. Not sure.
If it's a typo.... Maybe they are just trolling everybody. 
Absolutely no one believes Mond isn't the solid starter at this point.
But to your point, I absolutely hate mistakes/typos on publicly released documents. Drives me insane at work how some people don't pay attention to detail on stuff like this.
Absolutely no one believes Mond isn't the solid starter at this point.
But to your point, I absolutely hate mistakes/typos on publicly released documents. Drives me insane at work how some people don't pay attention to detail on stuff like this.
Yep. Jimbo's gotta triple option package featuring all 4 QBs:technoviking said:FriscoKid said:
really ben?
The OR indicates that the coaching staff has specific packages for those players where they will be on the field, not that there is a QB controversy.
Mond under center.
Blumrick at FB.
Foster and Calzada side by side.
LOOKOUT CLEMSON!
I'm not saying it's funny, but i'm hoping you guys realize Ben Baby is joking.
I'm trying to envision a package that you would want Blumrick at QB instead of Mond...? What unique athletic ability does he have that Mond doesn't? Trick plays are the only thing that comes to mind.
Happy to see McCollum starting at Center and not Prater. Also it's encouraging to see Jalen Preston backing up Ausbon.
tsuag10 said:
I'm trying to envision a package that you would want Blumrick at QB instead of Mond...? What unique athletic ability does he have that Mond doesn't? Trick plays are the only thing that comes to mind.
Take it up with jimbo, he said it not long ago.
Not really - Kellen Mond's name is in Bold and at the topThe Lost said:I mean someone was gonna say it. It's an idiotic typo. 2 deep writer should get all the craptsuag10 said:
Ben is literally the worst.
Interesting. I'll have to look for that.technoviking said:Take it up with jimbo, he said it not long ago.tsuag10 said:
I'm trying to envision a package that you would want Blumrick at QB instead of Mond...? What unique athletic ability does he have that Mond doesn't? Trick plays are the only thing that comes to mind.
rbcs_2 said:
I'm not saying it's funny, but i'm hoping you guys realize Ben Baby is joking.
I would love to give this website the benefit of the doubt, but we so rarely earn it...
tsuag10 said:Interesting. I'll have to look for that.technoviking said:Take it up with jimbo, he said it not long ago.tsuag10 said:
I'm trying to envision a package that you would want Blumrick at QB instead of Mond...? What unique athletic ability does he have that Mond doesn't? Trick plays are the only thing that comes to mind.
Start at 9:55
Are you serious?Tamu_mgm said:Not really - Kellen Mond's name is in Bold and at the topThe Lost said:I mean someone was gonna say it. It's an idiotic typo. 2 deep writer should get all the craptsuag10 said:
Ben is literally the worst.
Thanks.
Edit: He's talking about the RBs there. Not the QBs. The "or" makes a lot more sense for RBs.
Edit: He's talking about the RBs there. Not the QBs. The "or" makes a lot more sense for RBs.
tsuag10 said:
Thanks.
Edit: He's talking about the RBs there. Not the QBs. The "or" makes a lot more sense for RBs.
Well then I guess we have a 4 QB controversy
technoviking said:Well then I guess we have a 4 QB controversytsuag10 said:
Thanks.
Edit: He's talking about the RBs there. Not the QBs. The "or" makes a lot more sense for RBs.
Not much depth at fullback.