I don't mean for this to be an argument about which coach is better, but just looking at the situation...
Coach O won 9 games his first year at LSU. Jimbo won 9 games his first year at A&M. Last year, while Jimbo was winning those 9 games, Coach O won 10. On paper the recruiting classes they brought in last year are roughly equal.
Why does everyone think it's so likely that LSU wants to pay Coach O's buyout, then pay whatever it takes to moneywhip Jimbo away from his already massive moneywhip contract at A&M, all so they can have a different coach who so far has not meaningfully outperformed the coach they already have in the same division? Plus, is Coach O not popular at LSU? The guy seems like he was born to be the mascot for that place, are they that eager to get rid of him?
If A&M makes a big leap forward next year and LSU regresses, then maybe that changes the situation, but that's a couple of fairly significant ifs, and if that happens it also gives Jimbo a lot more incentive to stay in a situation that appears to be working out.
#sipbutnottrolling
Coach O won 9 games his first year at LSU. Jimbo won 9 games his first year at A&M. Last year, while Jimbo was winning those 9 games, Coach O won 10. On paper the recruiting classes they brought in last year are roughly equal.
Why does everyone think it's so likely that LSU wants to pay Coach O's buyout, then pay whatever it takes to moneywhip Jimbo away from his already massive moneywhip contract at A&M, all so they can have a different coach who so far has not meaningfully outperformed the coach they already have in the same division? Plus, is Coach O not popular at LSU? The guy seems like he was born to be the mascot for that place, are they that eager to get rid of him?
If A&M makes a big leap forward next year and LSU regresses, then maybe that changes the situation, but that's a couple of fairly significant ifs, and if that happens it also gives Jimbo a lot more incentive to stay in a situation that appears to be working out.
#sipbutnottrolling