Likely are. Bottom line here is that Hyman directly accused the university lawyers of misfeasance if not malpractice. Their employer/client is the university, not the BMAs. And as I said before the university is the party to the contract.Quote:
And many of these lawyers are friends with lawyers of the donors.
Or so I hear...
If that scenario actually happened and the university lawyers signed off on it, their employment status and compensation should be reviewed toot sweet.