Coaches association is going to NCAA with proposalthat states a player could play in as many as 4 games and still keep their redshirt.
Bone6 said:
I have no issue with that.
I think a garbage time policy for redshirts would be fine too. If the current point deficit during a game was say, 24 points or greater, then the playing time would have nothing to do with eligibility. It would give the true fish an in game experience without having truly contribute during the season.
Quote:
This would incentive scheduling really ****ty teams so you can take advantage of this and would also lead to less parity over time.
Maybe I am misunderstanding something but that is what you get right now. Everyone Can Redshirt and get 5 years to play 4. This rule is saying everyone is getting 5 years to play 4 years plus 4 games.yeshellyes said:
Give all players 5 years to play 4. RS' s not needed.
eothunter2012 said:
Gives our redshirt QBs playing time for when the starter inevitably transfers.
Bone6 said:Quote:
This would incentive scheduling really ****ty teams so you can take advantage of this and would also lead to less parity over time.
Have you not been following college football over the past 25 years??? Major programs have been scheduling cream puff non conference teams for a long time. The incentive is already strongly there.
A strong incentive for soft non conference schedules is there regardless of whether a few true fish were to get a few reps in garbage time. The way you fix that is by rewarding strength of schedule in rankings.
As for parity, sure, Ohio State and Alabama would get to "reload" a bit more easily if their rs-fr have had a few reps in clean up time under the big lights, but it would be very incremental.
Redshirting is a relic. Dumb!Aston04 said:
Just give them 5 to play 5. No more redshirting- medical or regular. Cut the bs. It's not like guys get a much lighter work load in practice their redshirt season anyway. What's the point?