Outside of murdering Hitler

4,452 Views | 21 Replies | Last: 4 yr ago by Rabid Cougar
annie88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Or beating him up, he can't do anything to you, etc., simply dealing with conversation,

If you could be in a room with Hitler for an hour, what would you ask him? What would you tell him?
HollywoodBQ
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Sprechen Sie English?
Or do I get to have a translator present?

Also, which version of Hitler do we get to speak with in your hypothetical scenario?

The painter, the Great War Soldier, the author, the guy who just opened the Olympic Games in Berlin, the madman who is killing millions of people, or the defeated maniac who realizes the only option for his future is suicide and cremation.

I reckon speaking with each of those personalities would produce quite different conversations.
CanyonAg77
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I guess I don't see any reason to talk to him. He hated Jews, he wanted Germany to rule Europe. He had a lot of hate and resentment, and toward the end of his life he was a drug addict, which made his decisions even more irrational and paranoid.

What is there to learn?

Maybe, how was Eva in the sack? Do you really just have one testicle?
BrazosBendHorn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Here's how'd I'd spend my hour with der Fuhrer ...

BrazosBendHorn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Seriously, I would inform der Fuhrer about how in the future there's this thing called the internet, and it's worldwide, and that he's the butt of the joke in about 1,000,000+ videos on an internet site called YouTube.

"There's your fame for future generations. How do you hold with that, Schickelgruber?"



Warning: captions may be NSFW (depending on your office culture)
Cinco Ranch Aggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I would ask him WTF was he thinking? You really thought it was a good idea to punch the Russian bear in the face while being entangled with the Brits and Americans?

I also would show him any number of those videos taken from footage of the movie Downfall - Hitler learns that A&M is leaving the Big 12, etc.
cbr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'd consider telling him he should focus on Moscow, get ready for a tough winter, don't grind you 6th army to dust in the city of Stalingrad, and beat the hell out of the commies

I am fairly certain we would be better off today with Germany having beaten the soviets.
terata
How long do you want to ignore this user?
P.H. Dexippus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Save yourself and your lieutenants from the noose and infamy by not mudering millions of civilians. Your name and that of your party will be scorned by even your own people for generations to come.
Ag_EQ12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
How would Americans have been better off off if Nazi Germany had defeated the Soviet Union? When we stormed the beaches at Normandy there were about 3 times as many German divisions on the Eastern front as there were on the Western front. Simply put, it is extremely unlikely the US and UK could have defeated Nazi Germany on their own.
CanyonAg77
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ag_EQ12 said:

How would Americans have been better off off if Nazi Germany had defeated the Soviet Union? When we stormed the beaches at Normandy there were about 3 times as many German divisions on the Eastern front as there were on the Western front. Simply put, it is extremely unlikely the US and UK could have defeated Nazi Germany on their own.
Would we have bothered?
cbr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ag_EQ12 said:

How would Americans have been better off off if Nazi Germany had defeated the Soviet Union? When we stormed the beaches at Normandy there were about 3 times as many German divisions on the Eastern front as there were on the Western front. Simply put, it is extremely unlikely the US and UK could have defeated Nazi Germany on their own.
nazism was a cult of personality and a nationalistic german ideology. no one but germans were ever going to sell their souls for Nazism. It posed no long term threat to the US.

Communism/socialism is an insidious, pervasive, dangerous fantasy, maintained by the poor everywhere. it remains a present day threat to our way of life and has been since day 1. frankly, communism has actually laid the foundation for the destruction of our entire society and, today, it appears likely to bring a coming new dark ages. nazism was never a legit threat to do that.

Communism/socialism IS corruption, and antithetical to meritocracy, benevolence, everything good our country stood for, and human progress everywhere. Its a fool's errand and it has basically taken over the entire world, except, ironically, maybe russia and poland and a few eastern European countries that remember what it was really like.

the nazis had no spies in our manhattan project. they had no real prospects for the atom bomb. they had no significant counter intel success, and posed no legit air or sea power supremacy threat.

we BURIED them. we produced more ships than they did planes. more planes than they did trucks. more trucks than they did boots. they had no chance against us at all.

in hindsight, we should have let hitler kill off stalin, and destroy communism. we could save our efforts against them and spend much fewer resources farting around in africa and the mideast and kicking japan's ass. we would have saved hundreds of thousands of american lives, including all of my great-uncles.

let germany destroy communism forever. after the exhausted wehrmacht did that, use our air/sea/nuclear domination to force them into concessions, give them a little lebensraum in the east, put a more friendly french and eastern russian government back in place to ringfence them, instead of that ******* degaul. make them chill out on the whole genocide thing, AND DONE.

hitler would not have outlasted a successful Barbarossa by more than a few years anyway. Too many dead sons for that. we could have pushed himmler out, and guys like goering or doenitz were not ideologues. they would have been easily managed.

a cold war against an ideological nazi non entity, that just focused on keeping our non-socialist allies in france/italy/england/eastern russia balanced against german power, and keeping the mideast out of their orbit is a recipe for INCREDIBLE long term stability, economic success, and benevolent western european democracies going. we would have had a strong western european culture, with all the benevolence, idealism, and progress that entails, instead of the mess we have had in real history.

instead, we squandered everything, oversaw what is looking now like the destruction of the greatest civilization in history, and we are all basically turning into a bunch of corrupt socialists now.

we would almost certainly have been much better off.


PS - this is not a criticism of our greatest generation and their choices and sacrifices. the premise of this thread is the benefit of hindsight.

though FDR was a socialist and his views were counterproductive, churchill was right - they HAD to address the immediate threat first. the most immediate threat was germany. the requirement to mobilize public support to defeat germany made it politically impossible to pivot to defeat the REAL enemy, the soviet union.

in a machiavellian ideal world, we would have joined up with some moderate german leaders, helped them depose hitler, and teamed up with germany to finish off the soviets in 1942-3. churchill knew this. so did patton.

But that is pure political fantasy. public opinion would never have allowed it. the propaganda required to start the war would never have allowed us to finish it properly in that fashion.









Liquid Wrench
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I would have asked him why he didn't put as much work into his art as he did into trying to conquer Europe.
Some of his art is pretty good.
TXAggie2011
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
He was one of the many Germans in the early days trying to slam France and put a fairly quick end to World War 1.

I'd ask him what he thinks the future of Europe would have been if Germany did quickly defeat France. And, more so, what would his future have held.

And then I'd press him in his biases he'd present in that answer.
Reload8098
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
l would tell him he's being replaced and put Rommel in charge. He'd take care of the commies. Then I'd throw Hitler to the Jews and let them kill him. How can anyone think of leaving him in power when he murdered innocent people. So many innocent people.
Stive
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Reload8098 said:

l would tell him he's being replaced and put Rommel in charge. He'd take care of the commies. Then I'd throw Hitler to the Jews and let them kill him. How can anyone think of leaving him in power when he murdered innocent people. So many innocent people.

And yet one of our biggest allies during that war did basically the same thing and we don't say much about and didn't do anything about it at the time.
Cinco Ranch Aggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Stive said:

Reload8098 said:

l would tell him he's being replaced and put Rommel in charge. He'd take care of the commies. Then I'd throw Hitler to the Jews and let them kill him. How can anyone think of leaving him in power when he murdered innocent people. So many innocent people.

And yet one of our biggest allies during that war did basically the same thing and we don't say much about and didn't do anything about it at the time.
We had a president who was friendly toward Stalin, calling him Uncle Joe. Once Hitler turned on the Soviets, what were we going to do, go to war against both of them? We had a difficult-enough task getting at the Nazis; we had no ability to get at the Russians from either the west or the east. As ugly as they were, they were a necessary ally, although I do agree with General Patton's stance on dealing with the Soviets while we had everything in place to do so in 1945.
Stive
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I completely get that and I'm not justifying one or the other. My point was simply that you have to be careful using the justification of "but he was killing innocent people" as the primary reason for going against one side or the other. In situations like WW2 that can/will inspire hypocrisies.
Reload8098
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Stive said:

Reload8098 said:

l would tell him he's being replaced and put Rommel in charge. He'd take care of the commies. Then I'd throw Hitler to the Jews and let them kill him. How can anyone think of leaving him in power when he murdered innocent people. So many innocent people.

And yet one of our biggest allies during that war did basically the same thing and we don't say much about and didn't do anything about it at the time.
Your point is not far off. Hitler's was to a race of people. Stalin was just anyone who didn't agree with him. The German's should have just taken care of business by assassinating the crazy POS. I know a few tried, they obviously just didn't finish the job. I'd be happy to put a cap in his a**.
commando2004
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Mr. AGSPRT04 said:

Save yourself and your lieutenants from the noose and infamy by not mudering millions of civilians. Your name and that of your party will be scorned by even your own people for generations to come.
"Even your mustache style will never escape the disdain of being associated with you."
BrazosBendHorn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'd like to get his thoughts on Brexit ...

BrazosBendHorn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
and now for something completely different*




*or not, actually
Rabid Cougar
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Reload8098 said:

Stive said:

Reload8098 said:

l would tell him he's being replaced and put Rommel in charge. He'd take care of the commies. Then I'd throw Hitler to the Jews and let them kill him. How can anyone think of leaving him in power when he murdered innocent people. So many innocent people.

And yet one of our biggest allies during that war did basically the same thing and we don't say much about and didn't do anything about it at the time.
Your point is not far off. Hitler's was to a race of people. Stalin was just anyone who didn't agree with him. The German's should have just taken care of business by assassinating the crazy POS. I know a few tried, they obviously just didn't finish the job. I'd be happy to put a cap in his a**.
There are probably quiet a few people that would have been happy to bust a cap on him but would you want to put your entire family and everyone you hold dear in danger by doing or attempting to do it?

EVERYONE that you call family, friends and associates die. There was something like 5,000 people lost their lives when Von Stauffenburg tried to. And killing him would not have made any difference because the Nazi's were deeply in power. He would have been made a martyr and Himmler would have continued on like nothing happened.

Stalin just killed everyone who he thought might be thinking about it and even before they thought about. .
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.