Good video by Engineering Explained
kyledr04 said:
Put a gas or diesel engine in it and call it a Blazer K5 then you've got something.
MAS444 said:
I think they look bad ass, though totally impractical.
Flaith said:
Going with a "truck" for the first iteration was a good move. I think it looks fine for the giant wasteful "SUV with offroad genes" obsession the US market has.
I won't buy one, but I'm sure it'll be a hot item for the Bronco/Rubicon bro demographic.
I'd take this 100x over the stupid looking cybertruck
That range and price point is going to be obsolete in 4 years. This car is basically a halo car with no meaningful market.Guitarsoup said:
Base Model:
80k
250mi range
Ready for purchase in 2024
Trash announcement.
I think it's a non-starter even if they start delivering them today. This vehicle is way less efficient than even the inefficient EVs on the market today. I know the Cybertruck isn't aesthetically pleasing to most, but the drivetrain/battery in it is going to be way more efficient than this thing.lb3 said:That range and price point is going to be obsolete in 4 years. This car is basically a halo car with no meaningful market.Guitarsoup said:
Base Model:
80k
250mi range
Ready for purchase in 2024
Trash announcement.
AggieAmmo said:
they picked the WRONG spokesperson
vansprinkle said:AggieAmmo said:
they picked the WRONG spokesperson
Are you referencing Demuro? He's a goober, but he does a fantastic job of reviewing vehicles.