got no problem with Abbott
Texan_Aggie said:
I'd be curious to see how many "bars" are still closed. I have seen the majority in my area switch to the restaurant license and open right back up. Anecdotally, I only know of 1-2 "bars" that are still closed.
At this point, it seems like if a bar really wanted to reopen, they could absent me not understanding some regulatory rule on why a bar could not get a restaurant license.
Agreed it hurts the smaller guys more, and I think the rules are so backa**wards on this, but there's still no barrier to entry other than the license fee and changing the business model, perhaps temporarily, to serve food. Bars that are staying closed now are either making a business or humanitarian decision at this point, which is on them, not the govt.swimmerbabe11 said:Texan_Aggie said:
I'd be curious to see how many "bars" are still closed. I have seen the majority in my area switch to the restaurant license and open right back up. Anecdotally, I only know of 1-2 "bars" that are still closed.
At this point, it seems like if a bar really wanted to reopen, they could absent me not understanding some regulatory rule on why a bar could not get a restaurant license.
This hurts divey local bars more than anyone. how are big star or d&w or Danny's fly a kite.. places like those going to make it? they can't do all of this stuff those places are doing.
why would a bar owner appreciate being closed?aggiemike02 said:
It's worth noting bar owners are as split as us random posters are on this. Many appreciate being closed and of course many don't. Lets all agree at least that TABC has been 'making up rules' as they go for YEARS.
If they aren't 100% their employees can get unemployment and work at another bar they own for cash or with PP money so they are only out rent on the others. If they own 5 bars and can keep 1 profitable they can limp along with the rest on the government dime.Ducks4brkfast said:why would a bar owner appreciate being closed?aggiemike02 said:
It's worth noting bar owners are as split as us random posters are on this. Many appreciate being closed and of course many don't. Lets all agree at least that TABC has been 'making up rules' as they go for YEARS.
I guess I just don't get it. All those remedies would still be available to them if they were allowed to operate at 100%.Bondag said:If they aren't 100% their employees can get unemployment and work at another bar they own for cash or with PP money so they are only out rent on the others. If they own 5 bars and can keep 1 profitable they can limp along with the rest on the government dime.Ducks4brkfast said:why would a bar owner appreciate being closed?aggiemike02 said:
It's worth noting bar owners are as split as us random posters are on this. Many appreciate being closed and of course many don't. Lets all agree at least that TABC has been 'making up rules' as they go for YEARS.
jetch17 said:
What a dick
BohunkAg said:
A business owner who appreciates being closed down by the government. That's a new one.
How about this...Fitch said:
The ones I know are already reopen and working to stay that way.
I know you have a difference of opinion, but pulling back full tilt will result in another spike, another wave of crazed "shut it down" (however transient) and will drive my friends out of business entirely.
My liberties are uninfringed. You want to discuss modes of commerce control, have at it.
Michael Berry had the bar owner in New Caney on this morning for a few segments. IIRC, she's lost her liquor license because she's doing exactly what she needs to in order to be within the rules except paying the TABC several hundred dollars for a piece of paper. It's nothing more than an effing money grab.swimmerbabe11 said:Texan_Aggie said:
I'd be curious to see how many "bars" are still closed. I have seen the majority in my area switch to the restaurant license and open right back up. Anecdotally, I only know of 1-2 "bars" that are still closed.
At this point, it seems like if a bar really wanted to reopen, they could absent me not understanding some regulatory rule on why a bar could not get a restaurant license.
This hurts divey local bars more than anyone. how are big star or d&w or Danny's fly a kite.. places like those going to make it? they can't do all of this stuff those places are doing.
You just have to live stacked upon each other and have it run through your vulnerable population all at once with the highest death rates in the world, then you can get to 1%.jetch17 said:
"NYC is near 1% .... if NYC can do it, then Houston can do it... okaaaaaay"
"5% is not just some magic number people...."