jinx
One thing that has been very clear through this process....Turner does not like Hidalgo. I'm wondering if the Dems are going to primary her?blindey said:
It's a really weird day when we're looking at Sly Turner as a bastion of common sense.
Jinx! buy me a coke!Diggity said:
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/04/10/upshot/coronavirus-deaths-new-york-city.html
I don't pay for it. You can read it without subscribing. Might have to turn of add blockers though. You think the NYT is making up how many people have DIED in NY. I can give you maybe how many of the deaths were caused by Covid, but how many have actually died at all??? Really?aTm2004 said:
How about something not behind a paywall. And NY Times?
Quote:
"The extent of damage from the virus may be greater than we anticipated, and the indirect effects of the virus may be greater than we anticipated," said Harlan Krumholz, a cardiologist and professor at Yale Medical School, who is particularly concerned that patients with cardiac conditions are not seeking care because of the fear of being infected with coronavirus. "Meaning that the overall toll is much greater."
The overall rise in deaths suggests that the combination of crowded hospitals, an overtaxed ambulance system and a fearful population could have resulted in more deaths among people with heart attacks, strokes or other ailments who might have survived in normal circumstances.
No. Staying away when they otherwise would have seeked help is what appears to be the reason.Texaggie7nine said:
So fear of CV without actually getting it is what you attribute to be the majority of the increase causing more than double the daily deaths?
aTm2004 said:Does only testing if you meet certain requirements ring a bell? If your'e only testing people who have a high probability of having it, you're going to have a huge spike in cases. And now, it seems like it's been around much longer than people originally thought and more people have the antibodies than originally thought, so is the spike really a spike?cajunaggie08 said:we tried that back in february. does the exponential spike in cases not ring a bell? Sure our hospitals didnt get overloaded thankfully as we practiced social distancing early enough.aTm2004 said:Or just practice the same hygiene procedures we always have and go about our lives,cajunaggie08 said:
all those quotes seem to justify that wearing a mask to reduce the spread of infected person water/spit droplets is a good idea.Yeah, the death numbers will look huge if you count anybody that had it or could have had it as a COVID death, even if it wasn't the true cause of their death. Do you honestly think someone in hospice with a month to live who tested positive from COVID was killed by COVID? But hey, that 50,000 deaths is much better than the millions the "experts" predicted at the start of this.Quote:
We are currently at around 50,000 deaths related to COVID-19 in the US. Sure you can argue about how what percentage of those are deaths that would have occurred anyways but they happened to have tested positive for the virus. We hit that 50,000 number in roughly 2 months and we aren't out of the woods yet.
Dr Birx: "If someone dies with COVID-19, we are counting that."
Yeah, that's not going to skew the numbers up, is it?Because the above mentioned person's neighbor in hospice who died of what they were there for who had the flu isn't being counted as a flu death.Quote:
The CDC reports we have had anywhere between 24,000 and 62,000 deaths related to the 2019-20 flu season which runs from october through april. We currently are at the peak of number of newly infected per day which only exists because of social distancing and we have already equaled or perhaps surpassed the flu season death count. Are you really convinced this is just no worse than a flu and we'll all just go about our lives with the same previous set of general hygiene rules and the death count wont somehow hit 200,000 by the end of the year?
Texaggie7nine said:
My point was you stated that there are other things out there right now in the air that are just as dangerous and just as likely for me to catch as CV, and that I should forever wear a mask to be consistent.
I'm asking you what else has produced as many bodies in such a short time that I need to worry about being as likely to catch, and thus wear a mask at all times.
Also if you took away from that NYT article that most of the increase in deaths is from people afraid to go to the hospital... there is no point in continuing.
Quote:
But the deaths over the last month dwarf what would be expected from seasonal variations, and look more like a mass casualty event. The city's medical examiner's office is holding bodies in refrigerated trailers outside of hospitals. City emergency medical technicians are declaring deaths in homes and on the streets instead of bringing people to hospitals.
Quote:
Social distancing and stay at home orders have never been about preventing deaths. Preventing deaths is just a side effect of trying to prevent too many people from getting sick at the same time and overwhelming the hospitals.
You think that is saying that most of those deaths are from people scared to go to the doctor? Most of the deaths are happening AT the hospitals.aTm2004 said:Texaggie7nine said:
My point was you stated that there are other things out there right now in the air that are just as dangerous and just as likely for me to catch as CV, and that I should forever wear a mask to be consistent.
I'm asking you what else has produced as many bodies in such a short time that I need to worry about being as likely to catch, and thus wear a mask at all times.
Also if you took away from that NYT article that most of the increase in deaths is from people afraid to go to the hospital... there is no point in continuing.
There are always viruses and bacteria out there that are dangerous and potentially deadly. You're assuming the current death rate is accurate, and I don't agree for the 2 reasons I've posted earlier (with it is counted, and we don't k is the true denominator, which is growing everyday). I don't believe the death rate is near the 5.5% that the Johns Hopkins numbers are showing. I believe it is much much o lower. Then couple all of this with the microscopic view we're giving this vs. other stuff, and it looks like it's one of the deadliest viruses ever. I'm just not buying it.
What did you take from the article, because what I got from it is people who otherwise would have seeked medical attention aren't.Quote:
But the deaths over the last month dwarf what would be expected from seasonal variations, and look more like a mass casualty event. The city's medical examiner's office is holding bodies in refrigerated trailers outside of hospitals. City emergency medical technicians are declaring deaths in homes and on the streets instead of bringing people to hospitals.
The article is not saying the majority of the 5k additional deaths are from patients not seeing their doctor out of fear. It simply says that could be another additional thing to raise the deaths above the already thousands and thousands of CV deaths.Quote:
The recent numbers are most likely an undercount. Even in normal times, death certificates take time to be processed and collected, and complete death tallies can take weeks to become final. This is especially true for cases involving coronavirus. "Covid deaths all have to be manually coded," said Bob Anderson, chief of the mortality statistics branch at the C.D.C.'s National Center for Health Statistics, adding that death counts from New York City typically lag actual deaths by 10 or 11 days.
But even if the current count is perfect, roughly 9,780 people have died of all causes over the past month in New York City, about 5,000 more than is typical.
The numbers for the last two weeks of the period are even more stark: nearly 7,000 dead, more than three times as many deaths as would normally be expected this time of year.
aTm2004 said:Quote:
Social distancing and stay at home orders have never been about preventing deaths. Preventing deaths is just a side effect of trying to prevent too many people from getting sick at the same time and overwhelming the hospitals.
I'm well aware it was to prevent overwhelming hospitals. So is my SIL who is a PA in an ER in Iowa (one of the states who doesn't have any restrictions), who is having shifts cut and having to use PTO to get paid or save PTO and not get paid. The same SIL who said she used to see 35-40 patients per shift only seeing 7 now. Yeah, overwhelming the hospitals. There are several healthcare workers on TA who are seeing their hospitals as ghost towns because of all of this as well.
Texaggie7nine said:You think that is saying that most of those deaths are from people scared to go to the doctor? Most of the deaths are happening AT the hospitals.aTm2004 said:Texaggie7nine said:
My point was you stated that there are other things out there right now in the air that are just as dangerous and just as likely for me to catch as CV, and that I should forever wear a mask to be consistent.
I'm asking you what else has produced as many bodies in such a short time that I need to worry about being as likely to catch, and thus wear a mask at all times.
Also if you took away from that NYT article that most of the increase in deaths is from people afraid to go to the hospital... there is no point in continuing.
There are always viruses and bacteria out there that are dangerous and potentially deadly. You're assuming the current death rate is accurate, and I don't agree for the 2 reasons I've posted earlier (with it is counted, and we don't k is the true denominator, which is growing everyday). I don't believe the death rate is near the 5.5% that the Johns Hopkins numbers are showing. I believe it is much much o lower. Then couple all of this with the microscopic view we're giving this vs. other stuff, and it looks like it's one of the deadliest viruses ever. I'm just not buying it.
What did you take from the article, because what I got from it is people who otherwise would have seeked medical attention aren't.Quote:
But the deaths over the last month dwarf what would be expected from seasonal variations, and look more like a mass casualty event. The city's medical examiner's office is holding bodies in refrigerated trailers outside of hospitals. City emergency medical technicians are declaring deaths in homes and on the streets instead of bringing people to hospitals.The article is not saying the majority of the 5k additional deaths are from patients not seeing their doctor out of fear. It simply says that could be another additional thing to raise the deaths above the already thousands and thousands of CV deaths.Quote:
The recent numbers are most likely an undercount. Even in normal times, death certificates take time to be processed and collected, and complete death tallies can take weeks to become final. This is especially true for cases involving coronavirus. "Covid deaths all have to be manually coded," said Bob Anderson, chief of the mortality statistics branch at the C.D.C.'s National Center for Health Statistics, adding that death counts from New York City typically lag actual deaths by 10 or 11 days.
But even if the current count is perfect, roughly 9,780 people have died of all causes over the past month in New York City, about 5,000 more than is typical.
The numbers for the last two weeks of the period are even more stark: nearly 7,000 dead, more than three times as many deaths as would normally be expected this time of year.
In any case, CV is still ultimately the cause of those deaths. Just indirectly.
Quote:
I think the fact that some hospitals are ghost towns right now is probably a good thing, considering the circumstances. It's certainly a better problem to have than the alternative. Would you and/or your SIL rather have her hospital look like one in NYC?
You are doing this on purpose aren't you? The article is not saying that people being scared to go see their doctor is anywhere NEAR being the primary reason the death rates have more than doubled. The graphic in the article itself shows of those 5000 additional deaths, over 3k have already been counted as dying from CV and it expects more will be. How is that saying most of the deaths are from people scared to go to the doctor?Quote:
You asked what led to the death rate in NYC doubling, and I showed you in the article you posted what is believed to be the reason. You're saying it's COVID indirectly doing it by what I stated from the article.
Quote:
That total for the city includes deaths directly linked to the novel coronavirus as well as those from other causes, like heart attacks and cancer. Even this is only a partial count; we expect this number to rise as more deaths are counted.
aTm2004 said:Quote:
I think the fact that some hospitals are ghost towns right now is probably a good thing, considering the circumstances. It's certainly a better problem to have than the alternative. Would you and/or your SIL rather have her hospital look like one in NYC?
Some? Outside of NYC, who's leaders were saying it's nothing to fear and go to Chinatown, hospitals are hurting from the lack of "elective" procedures. Elective isn't only a boob job. It's also a hip replacement, needed skin graft, etc.
I'm sure my SIL would prefer to not see her hours and paychecks cut and live with the real fear of losing her job.
Quote:
On Tuesday, March 24, County Judge Lina Hidalgo signed a Stay Home, Work Safe order outlining measures to protect public health. The violators of this order are subject to fines and up to 180 days in jail. To report non-essential entities violating current public health orders click this link or call 832-839-6941.
TXTransplant said:aTm2004 said:Quote:
I think the fact that some hospitals are ghost towns right now is probably a good thing, considering the circumstances. It's certainly a better problem to have than the alternative. Would you and/or your SIL rather have her hospital look like one in NYC?
Some? Outside of NYC, who's leaders were saying it's nothing to fear and go to Chinatown, hospitals are hurting from the lack of "elective" procedures. Elective isn't only a boob job. It's also a hip replacement, needed skin graft, etc.
I'm sure my SIL would prefer to not see her hours and paychecks cut and live with the real fear of losing her job.
I think we did what we needed to do considering the information we had in early March. Things are slowly starting to open back up. I believe OK lifted the ban on elective procedures this week. Abbott lifted some restrictions last week and is expected to lift more in his announcement on Monday.
I can't speak to all 50 states, because, frankly, I haven't been keeping up with them all. But Houston/Harris County is the third largest metro area in the country. It wasn't unreasonable to think what happened in NYC or Seattle or Italy could have happened here. We simply didn't know what "best case scenario was", we only knew what "worst case" was and that we didn't want it to happen here.
I'm not going to get in a discussion about what politicians did or didn't say. There's been too many stupid statements made by a whole lot of people to even bother with that. I'll let them continue to point fingers at each other.
Milwaukees Best Light said:
I ain't readin all that bull***** Say what you need to say with gif.
J.D. c/o 05 said:
Take your order and shove it.
aTm2004 said:TXTransplant said:aTm2004 said:Quote:
I think the fact that some hospitals are ghost towns right now is probably a good thing, considering the circumstances. It's certainly a better problem to have than the alternative. Would you and/or your SIL rather have her hospital look like one in NYC?
Some? Outside of NYC, who's leaders were saying it's nothing to fear and go to Chinatown, hospitals are hurting from the lack of "elective" procedures. Elective isn't only a boob job. It's also a hip replacement, needed skin graft, etc.
I'm sure my SIL would prefer to not see her hours and paychecks cut and live with the real fear of losing her job.
I think we did what we needed to do considering the information we had in early March. Things are slowly starting to open back up. I believe OK lifted the ban on elective procedures this week. Abbott lifted some restrictions last week and is expected to lift more in his announcement on Monday.
I can't speak to all 50 states, because, frankly, I haven't been keeping up with them all. But Houston/Harris County is the third largest metro area in the country. It wasn't unreasonable to think what happened in NYC or Seattle or Italy could have happened here. We simply didn't know what "best case scenario was", we only knew what "worst case" was and that we didn't want it to happen here.
I'm not going to get in a discussion about what politicians did or didn't say. There's been too many stupid statements made by a whole lot of people to even bother with that. I'll let them continue to point fingers at each other.
No, it was unreasonable. Go read some of my earlier posts in this thread where I mentioned NYC and Italy having vary high percentages of people living in high/mid rise buildings, where majority of people in Houston, Dallas, Austin, etc live in single family homes. So population density isn't as much. Also, we're not as reliant on public transportation as they are, which are known petri dishes for viruses and bacteria.
We're not like New York in anyway.