Houston
Sponsored by

Tine Coronavirus thread

2,497,091 Views | 20959 Replies | Last: 1 mo ago by Ciboag96
Diggity
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
jinx
aTm2004
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
How about something not behind a paywall. And NY Times?
DuncanAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
blindey said:

It's a really weird day when we're looking at Sly Turner as a bastion of common sense.
One thing that has been very clear through this process....Turner does not like Hidalgo. I'm wondering if the Dems are going to primary her?

I have to say her PC yesterday was the worst one I have seen in a long time....starting off with the "in New York they are digging mass graves right now" line. What did we expect from a 29 year old who has never had a real job and is running one of the top 5 largest counties in the country. Elections matter....
Texaggie7nine
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Diggity said:

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/04/10/upshot/coronavirus-deaths-new-york-city.html
Jinx! buy me a coke!
7nine
Texaggie7nine
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aTm2004 said:

How about something not behind a paywall. And NY Times?
I don't pay for it. You can read it without subscribing. Might have to turn of add blockers though. You think the NYT is making up how many people have DIED in NY. I can give you maybe how many of the deaths were caused by Covid, but how many have actually died at all??? Really?
7nine
Daddy-O5
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
https://www.texastribune.org/2020/04/23/harris-county-face-mask-lina-hidalgo/
Unemployed
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Imagine the fun when Hidalgo runs for mayor and wins.
aTm2004
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Got it on my phone.

Quote:

"The extent of damage from the virus may be greater than we anticipated, and the indirect effects of the virus may be greater than we anticipated," said Harlan Krumholz, a cardiologist and professor at Yale Medical School, who is particularly concerned that patients with cardiac conditions are not seeking care because of the fear of being infected with coronavirus. "Meaning that the overall toll is much greater."

The overall rise in deaths suggests that the combination of crowded hospitals, an overtaxed ambulance system and a fearful population could have resulted in more deaths among people with heart attacks, strokes or other ailments who might have survived in normal circumstances.

From what it looks like, people who have medical conditions are staying away from doctors and hospitals out of fear of catching the virus, who under normal circumstances, would have seeked that care and possibly survived.
Texaggie7nine
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So fear of CV without actually getting it is what you attribute to be the majority of the increase causing more than double the daily deaths?
7nine
aTm2004
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yeah, I've wondered if there's friction between them two. There has to be. Turner worked his ass off for years buying off the right people to endorse him when he finally ran only to see some young inexperienced airhead get essentially the same job just because she was on the ballot when some fake Mexican was running for Senate and was able to get the sheep out to vote.
aTm2004
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Texaggie7nine said:

So fear of CV without actually getting it is what you attribute to be the majority of the increase causing more than double the daily deaths?
No. Staying away when they otherwise would have seeked help is what appears to be the reason.

What's your point in this? That people aren't dying of other things? Where did I say they weren't? I said if they die and test positive, they're counted as a COVID death, regardless of whether or not COVID was the cause.
Texaggie7nine
How long do you want to ignore this user?
My point was you stated that there are other things out there right now in the air that are just as dangerous and just as likely for me to catch as CV, and that I should forever wear a mask to be consistent.

I'm asking you what else has produced as many bodies in such a short time that I need to worry about being as likely to catch, and thus wear a mask at all times.


Also if you took away from that NYT article that most of the increase in deaths is from people afraid to go to the hospital... there is no point in continuing.
7nine
TXTransplant
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aTm2004 said:

cajunaggie08 said:

aTm2004 said:

cajunaggie08 said:

all those quotes seem to justify that wearing a mask to reduce the spread of infected person water/spit droplets is a good idea.
Or just practice the same hygiene procedures we always have and go about our lives,
we tried that back in february. does the exponential spike in cases not ring a bell? Sure our hospitals didnt get overloaded thankfully as we practiced social distancing early enough.
Does only testing if you meet certain requirements ring a bell? If your'e only testing people who have a high probability of having it, you're going to have a huge spike in cases. And now, it seems like it's been around much longer than people originally thought and more people have the antibodies than originally thought, so is the spike really a spike?

Quote:

We are currently at around 50,000 deaths related to COVID-19 in the US. Sure you can argue about how what percentage of those are deaths that would have occurred anyways but they happened to have tested positive for the virus. We hit that 50,000 number in roughly 2 months and we aren't out of the woods yet.
Yeah, the death numbers will look huge if you count anybody that had it or could have had it as a COVID death, even if it wasn't the true cause of their death. Do you honestly think someone in hospice with a month to live who tested positive from COVID was killed by COVID? But hey, that 50,000 deaths is much better than the millions the "experts" predicted at the start of this.

Dr Birx: "If someone dies with COVID-19, we are counting that."

Yeah, that's not going to skew the numbers up, is it?

Quote:

The CDC reports we have had anywhere between 24,000 and 62,000 deaths related to the 2019-20 flu season which runs from october through april. We currently are at the peak of number of newly infected per day which only exists because of social distancing and we have already equaled or perhaps surpassed the flu season death count. Are you really convinced this is just no worse than a flu and we'll all just go about our lives with the same previous set of general hygiene rules and the death count wont somehow hit 200,000 by the end of the year?
Because the above mentioned person's neighbor in hospice who died of what they were there for who had the flu isn't being counted as a flu death.


In terms of preventing hospitals from getting overwhelmed, it doesn't really matter how we classify the death of someone who has both a comorbidity and coronavirus.

The fundamental issues are that a) a lot of Americans have underlying health issues (and something like 1/2 of them don't even know it) and 2) coronavirus spreads very rapidly and makes these people very sick.

So, yeah, you've got people with cancer and diabetes and high blood pressure and obesity, but those people don't all get sick at the same time. Some of these underlying conditions may not be fatal for years.

But something like coronavirus spreads like wildfire and, all of a sudden, all these people with cancer and high blood pressure and diabetes and obesity are all in the hospital at the same time, needing ICU beds and ventilators. Under normal circumstances, most of them would be at home with their underlying conditions.

Social distancing and stay at home orders have never been about preventing deaths. Preventing deaths is just a side effect of trying to prevent too many people from getting sick at the same time and overwhelming the hospitals.

I think we've done a pretty good job of that. But trying use the fact that ~most~ of the people who have died were also sick with other conditions means that we overreacted and average, healthy people are safe is an erroneous conclusion. .
aTm2004
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Texaggie7nine said:

My point was you stated that there are other things out there right now in the air that are just as dangerous and just as likely for me to catch as CV, and that I should forever wear a mask to be consistent.

I'm asking you what else has produced as many bodies in such a short time that I need to worry about being as likely to catch, and thus wear a mask at all times.


Also if you took away from that NYT article that most of the increase in deaths is from people afraid to go to the hospital... there is no point in continuing.

There are always viruses and bacteria out there that are dangerous and potentially deadly. You're assuming the current death rate is accurate, and I don't agree for the 2 reasons I've posted earlier (with it is counted, and we don't k is the true denominator, which is growing everyday). I don't believe the death rate is near the 5.5% that the Johns Hopkins numbers are showing. I believe it is much much o lower. Then couple all of this with the microscopic view we're giving this vs. other stuff, and it looks like it's one of the deadliest viruses ever. I'm just not buying it.

What did you take from the article, because what I got from it is people who otherwise would have seeked medical attention aren't.

Quote:

But the deaths over the last month dwarf what would be expected from seasonal variations, and look more like a mass casualty event. The city's medical examiner's office is holding bodies in refrigerated trailers outside of hospitals. City emergency medical technicians are declaring deaths in homes and on the streets instead of bringing people to hospitals.
aTm2004
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

Social distancing and stay at home orders have never been about preventing deaths. Preventing deaths is just a side effect of trying to prevent too many people from getting sick at the same time and overwhelming the hospitals.

I'm well aware it was to prevent overwhelming hospitals. So is my SIL who is a PA in an ER in Iowa (one of the states who doesn't have any restrictions), who is having shifts cut and having to use PTO to get paid or save PTO and not get paid. The same SIL who said she used to see 35-40 patients per shift only seeing 7 now. Yeah, overwhelming the hospitals. There are several healthcare workers on TA who are seeing their hospitals as ghost towns because of all of this as well.
Texaggie7nine
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aTm2004 said:

Texaggie7nine said:

My point was you stated that there are other things out there right now in the air that are just as dangerous and just as likely for me to catch as CV, and that I should forever wear a mask to be consistent.

I'm asking you what else has produced as many bodies in such a short time that I need to worry about being as likely to catch, and thus wear a mask at all times.


Also if you took away from that NYT article that most of the increase in deaths is from people afraid to go to the hospital... there is no point in continuing.

There are always viruses and bacteria out there that are dangerous and potentially deadly. You're assuming the current death rate is accurate, and I don't agree for the 2 reasons I've posted earlier (with it is counted, and we don't k is the true denominator, which is growing everyday). I don't believe the death rate is near the 5.5% that the Johns Hopkins numbers are showing. I believe it is much much o lower. Then couple all of this with the microscopic view we're giving this vs. other stuff, and it looks like it's one of the deadliest viruses ever. I'm just not buying it.

What did you take from the article, because what I got from it is people who otherwise would have seeked medical attention aren't.

Quote:

But the deaths over the last month dwarf what would be expected from seasonal variations, and look more like a mass casualty event. The city's medical examiner's office is holding bodies in refrigerated trailers outside of hospitals. City emergency medical technicians are declaring deaths in homes and on the streets instead of bringing people to hospitals.

You think that is saying that most of those deaths are from people scared to go to the doctor? Most of the deaths are happening AT the hospitals.

Quote:

The recent numbers are most likely an undercount. Even in normal times, death certificates take time to be processed and collected, and complete death tallies can take weeks to become final. This is especially true for cases involving coronavirus. "Covid deaths all have to be manually coded," said Bob Anderson, chief of the mortality statistics branch at the C.D.C.'s National Center for Health Statistics, adding that death counts from New York City typically lag actual deaths by 10 or 11 days.
But even if the current count is perfect, roughly 9,780 people have died of all causes over the past month in New York City, about 5,000 more than is typical.

The numbers for the last two weeks of the period are even more stark: nearly 7,000 dead, more than three times as many deaths as would normally be expected this time of year.
The article is not saying the majority of the 5k additional deaths are from patients not seeing their doctor out of fear. It simply says that could be another additional thing to raise the deaths above the already thousands and thousands of CV deaths.

In any case, CV is still ultimately the cause of those deaths. Just indirectly.
7nine
TXTransplant
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aTm2004 said:

Quote:

Social distancing and stay at home orders have never been about preventing deaths. Preventing deaths is just a side effect of trying to prevent too many people from getting sick at the same time and overwhelming the hospitals.

I'm well aware it was to prevent overwhelming hospitals. So is my SIL who is a PA in an ER in Iowa (one of the states who doesn't have any restrictions), who is having shifts cut and having to use PTO to get paid or save PTO and not get paid. The same SIL who said she used to see 35-40 patients per shift only seeing 7 now. Yeah, overwhelming the hospitals. There are several healthcare workers on TA who are seeing their hospitals as ghost towns because of all of this as well.


So, who had a crystal ball and could predict how bad it was going to get in every state and in every city? This isn't just an NYC/big city thing. A very small town in Georgia was overwhelmed because an infected person went to a funeral.

I think the fact that some hospitals are ghost towns right now is probably a good thing, considering the circumstances. It's certainly a better problem to have than the alternative. Would you and/or your SIL rather have her hospital look like one in NYC?

This wasn't a situation where we could hold off and "wait and see" how bad it was going to get. Because once things get bad, they go to worse, worst, and SHTF really fast.

And I'm certain that once things calm down, hospitals will once again be filled with the usual really sick people and hypochondriacs.
aTm2004
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Texaggie7nine said:

aTm2004 said:

Texaggie7nine said:

My point was you stated that there are other things out there right now in the air that are just as dangerous and just as likely for me to catch as CV, and that I should forever wear a mask to be consistent.

I'm asking you what else has produced as many bodies in such a short time that I need to worry about being as likely to catch, and thus wear a mask at all times.


Also if you took away from that NYT article that most of the increase in deaths is from people afraid to go to the hospital... there is no point in continuing.

There are always viruses and bacteria out there that are dangerous and potentially deadly. You're assuming the current death rate is accurate, and I don't agree for the 2 reasons I've posted earlier (with it is counted, and we don't k is the true denominator, which is growing everyday). I don't believe the death rate is near the 5.5% that the Johns Hopkins numbers are showing. I believe it is much much o lower. Then couple all of this with the microscopic view we're giving this vs. other stuff, and it looks like it's one of the deadliest viruses ever. I'm just not buying it.

What did you take from the article, because what I got from it is people who otherwise would have seeked medical attention aren't.

Quote:

But the deaths over the last month dwarf what would be expected from seasonal variations, and look more like a mass casualty event. The city's medical examiner's office is holding bodies in refrigerated trailers outside of hospitals. City emergency medical technicians are declaring deaths in homes and on the streets instead of bringing people to hospitals.

You think that is saying that most of those deaths are from people scared to go to the doctor? Most of the deaths are happening AT the hospitals.

Quote:

The recent numbers are most likely an undercount. Even in normal times, death certificates take time to be processed and collected, and complete death tallies can take weeks to become final. This is especially true for cases involving coronavirus. "Covid deaths all have to be manually coded," said Bob Anderson, chief of the mortality statistics branch at the C.D.C.'s National Center for Health Statistics, adding that death counts from New York City typically lag actual deaths by 10 or 11 days.
But even if the current count is perfect, roughly 9,780 people have died of all causes over the past month in New York City, about 5,000 more than is typical.

The numbers for the last two weeks of the period are even more stark: nearly 7,000 dead, more than three times as many deaths as would normally be expected this time of year.
The article is not saying the majority of the 5k additional deaths are from patients not seeing their doctor out of fear. It simply says that could be another additional thing to raise the deaths above the already thousands and thousands of CV deaths.

In any case, CV is still ultimately the cause of those deaths. Just indirectly.

We're both saying the same thing. You asked what led to the death rate in NYC doubling, and I showed you in the article you posted what is believed to be the reason. You're saying it's COVID indirectly doing it by what I stated from the article.

In the end, it makes the COVID situation even sillier. People who need legit medical care are too scared to seek it out of the hyped up fear. IMO, it's not COVID, it's the "experts" who predicted millions dead, trumped up death rates, and fear porn from the media that's the indirect cause.
aTm2004
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

I think the fact that some hospitals are ghost towns right now is probably a good thing, considering the circumstances. It's certainly a better problem to have than the alternative. Would you and/or your SIL rather have her hospital look like one in NYC?

Some? Outside of NYC, who's leaders were saying it's nothing to fear and go to Chinatown, hospitals are hurting from the lack of "elective" procedures. Elective isn't only a boob job. It's also a hip replacement, needed skin graft, etc.

I'm sure my SIL would prefer to not see her hours and paychecks cut and live with the real fear of losing her job.
Texaggie7nine
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

You asked what led to the death rate in NYC doubling, and I showed you in the article you posted what is believed to be the reason. You're saying it's COVID indirectly doing it by what I stated from the article.
You are doing this on purpose aren't you? The article is not saying that people being scared to go see their doctor is anywhere NEAR being the primary reason the death rates have more than doubled. The graphic in the article itself shows of those 5000 additional deaths, over 3k have already been counted as dying from CV and it expects more will be. How is that saying most of the deaths are from people scared to go to the doctor?

Quote:

That total for the city includes deaths directly linked to the novel coronavirus as well as those from other causes, like heart attacks and cancer. Even this is only a partial count; we expect this number to rise as more deaths are counted.
7nine
TXTransplant
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aTm2004 said:

Quote:

I think the fact that some hospitals are ghost towns right now is probably a good thing, considering the circumstances. It's certainly a better problem to have than the alternative. Would you and/or your SIL rather have her hospital look like one in NYC?

Some? Outside of NYC, who's leaders were saying it's nothing to fear and go to Chinatown, hospitals are hurting from the lack of "elective" procedures. Elective isn't only a boob job. It's also a hip replacement, needed skin graft, etc.

I'm sure my SIL would prefer to not see her hours and paychecks cut and live with the real fear of losing her job.


I think we did what we needed to do considering the information we had in early March. Things are slowly starting to open back up. I believe OK lifted the ban on elective procedures this week. Abbott lifted some restrictions last week and is expected to lift more in his announcement on Monday.

I can't speak to all 50 states, because, frankly, I haven't been keeping up with them all. But Houston/Harris County is the third largest metro area in the country. It wasn't unreasonable to think what happened in NYC or Seattle or Italy could have happened here. We simply didn't know what "best case scenario was", we only knew what "worst case" was and that we didn't want it to happen here.

I'm not going to get in a discussion about what politicians did or didn't say. There's been too many stupid statements made by a whole lot of people to even bother with that. I'll let them continue to point fingers at each other.
XpressAg09
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Wasn't aware it existed, but for those of you seriously concerned, it looks like Harris County has their own snitch line. It doesn't say you can't text, but I'd imagine they learned their lesson after NYC had to shut down their text line very suddenly after launching it.
Quote:


On Tuesday, March 24, County Judge Lina Hidalgo signed a Stay Home, Work Safe order outlining measures to protect public health. The violators of this order are subject to fines and up to 180 days in jail. To report non-essential entities violating current public health orders click this link or call 832-839-6941.
aTm2004
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Again, assuming the deaths from COVID are accurate. I don't believe they are for reasons stated above. Reread what I just wrote. You believe they are. I don't. And you're dismissing the rest of the article where they're saying people are dying from things they otherwise wouldn't have had they seeked medical attention they're now not doing. But keep being you.
Ag_07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
You two need to take this shlt to DMs, email, Zoom, Grindr, whatever.

I don't care but this back and forth bickering and arguing is ridiculous.
aTm2004
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TXTransplant said:

aTm2004 said:

Quote:

I think the fact that some hospitals are ghost towns right now is probably a good thing, considering the circumstances. It's certainly a better problem to have than the alternative. Would you and/or your SIL rather have her hospital look like one in NYC?

Some? Outside of NYC, who's leaders were saying it's nothing to fear and go to Chinatown, hospitals are hurting from the lack of "elective" procedures. Elective isn't only a boob job. It's also a hip replacement, needed skin graft, etc.

I'm sure my SIL would prefer to not see her hours and paychecks cut and live with the real fear of losing her job.


I think we did what we needed to do considering the information we had in early March. Things are slowly starting to open back up. I believe OK lifted the ban on elective procedures this week. Abbott lifted some restrictions last week and is expected to lift more in his announcement on Monday.

I can't speak to all 50 states, because, frankly, I haven't been keeping up with them all. But Houston/Harris County is the third largest metro area in the country. It wasn't unreasonable to think what happened in NYC or Seattle or Italy could have happened here. We simply didn't know what "best case scenario was", we only knew what "worst case" was and that we didn't want it to happen here.

I'm not going to get in a discussion about what politicians did or didn't say. There's been too many stupid statements made by a whole lot of people to even bother with that. I'll let them continue to point fingers at each other.

No, it was unreasonable. Go read some of my earlier posts in this thread where I mentioned NYC and Italy having vary high percentages of people living in high/mid rise buildings, where majority of people in Houston, Dallas, Austin, etc live in single family homes. So population density isn't as much. Also, we're not as reliant on public transportation as they are, which are known petri dishes for viruses and bacteria.

We're not like New York in anyway.
aTm2004
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Still butthurt facts showed it's not some super virus that spreads in unique ways?
ChemAg15
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This thread has been dull for weeks. A good slap fight is exactly what we need in these trying times. Someone on the internet is wrong and they need to ****ing know it
Milwaukees Best Light
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I ain't readin all that bull***** Say what you need to say with gif.

Texaggie7nine
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Milwaukees Best Light said:

I ain't readin all that bull***** Say what you need to say with gif.





Ok then

7nine
Daddy-O5
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


Take your order and shove it.
TX04Aggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yep, totally agree, Sly has played the game way too long and I am sure he probably had a decent working relationship with Emmett, so I bet there is friction between the two and I strangely would defer to crooked Sly if they were my only two options in the room for decisions. Thanks for whoever posted thay HPD wouldnt be enforcing it. I missed that today.
aTm2004
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Same. I feel dirty for choosing either of them, but I'd go with Mitchelow Ultra over the other option.
P.H. Dexippus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
J.D. c/o 05 said:



Take your order and shove it.

Grew up with her step son. Good people.

ETA- I realized who I was responding to...also good people!
aTm2004
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Being a scared sheep and taking orders from a politician who has never held a job in her life?

TXTransplant
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aTm2004 said:

TXTransplant said:

aTm2004 said:

Quote:

I think the fact that some hospitals are ghost towns right now is probably a good thing, considering the circumstances. It's certainly a better problem to have than the alternative. Would you and/or your SIL rather have her hospital look like one in NYC?

Some? Outside of NYC, who's leaders were saying it's nothing to fear and go to Chinatown, hospitals are hurting from the lack of "elective" procedures. Elective isn't only a boob job. It's also a hip replacement, needed skin graft, etc.

I'm sure my SIL would prefer to not see her hours and paychecks cut and live with the real fear of losing her job.


I think we did what we needed to do considering the information we had in early March. Things are slowly starting to open back up. I believe OK lifted the ban on elective procedures this week. Abbott lifted some restrictions last week and is expected to lift more in his announcement on Monday.

I can't speak to all 50 states, because, frankly, I haven't been keeping up with them all. But Houston/Harris County is the third largest metro area in the country. It wasn't unreasonable to think what happened in NYC or Seattle or Italy could have happened here. We simply didn't know what "best case scenario was", we only knew what "worst case" was and that we didn't want it to happen here.

I'm not going to get in a discussion about what politicians did or didn't say. There's been too many stupid statements made by a whole lot of people to even bother with that. I'll let them continue to point fingers at each other.

No, it was unreasonable. Go read some of my earlier posts in this thread where I mentioned NYC and Italy having vary high percentages of people living in high/mid rise buildings, where majority of people in Houston, Dallas, Austin, etc live in single family homes. So population density isn't as much. Also, we're not as reliant on public transportation as they are, which are known petri dishes for viruses and bacteria.

We're not like New York in anyway.


Nice to know that you're clairvoyant and can know for sure that we overreacted.

I agree that Houston isn't like NYC or Italy in terms of population density. But that doesn't mean that we couldn't have had an outbreak here that stressed the hospital system. Or one that spread through the chemical plants and refineries. Or one at the rodeo, similar to what happened during Mardi Gras in New Orleans.

We had absolutely no way of knowing how many people in the area were initially infected and how many people would get sick.

Now that we have a better understanding of those numbers, I do think it's time to allow some businesses to open back up. However, there are still a lot of people who need to stay home to protect themselves. And employers need to understand that and allow those people to continue to WFH if at all possible. Unfortunately, I don't think all employers are going to be that understanding and flexible.

I'm not as concerned about another outbreak as I am about people not being able to continue to protect themselves and their family without putting their employment at risk.


First Page Last Page
Page 104 of 599
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.