Because the Council member in question's remarks were primarily related to the discussion about the Charter Amendment to move CoCS elections exclusively to odd years, that is the portion to which I listened. This is a topic best served by a separate thread.
CoCS 7.8.21 Council meeting, approximately 1:02 through 1:45 - then 2:03:30 when when noted Council member spoke again prior to adjournment, as in OP's link.
During this discussion there was no direct reference to social media remarks. She may have in the first hour of the meeting, please spare me.
This member did name a Republican community leader as having made a statement regarding odd and even year voting and chastised his having and sharing an opinion. I know this individual and am familiar with his non-involvement with this CS issue. He did not make any related public statement. Full disclosure, I have made such statements over the years on multiple venues and will continue to do so each time the topic is dragged to the forefront.
Just prior to adjournment this member asked that the next meeting's agenda include appropriate ethics code verbiage to keep appointees from criticizing the city council or staff or to make appointees be positive. Thus many of the prior comments were on the mark or close.
As noted by a poster above, on that day
The Eagle published an op-ed regarding the Charter Amendment by a member of CS Planning and Zoning Commission. Several people close to the matter suspect he was her target due to proximate time and being easily identifiable.
It will be interesting to see if CS staff has a better understanding of the First Amendment than this council member. Surely some will realize it is disparate thought, opinion, and input that helps us craft stronger solutions.
momlaw