91_Aggie said:
cavscout96 said:
91_Aggie said:
cavscout96 said:
91_Aggie said:
So, forgot about government making you do it.
If there is some effectiveness which seems to be the case in other countries where citiizens voluntarily wore them for the sake of the common good and they are nowhere the per capita rates of us. Not because mandated. But because it seemed common sense and empathy for others was a higher priority in their lives than "Ain't no one gonna tell me what to do" mentality.
And all the arguments thrown out by those who refuse to wear masks are just either politcally based, conspiracy based, or just out right stubborness for no real reason other than to rebel for some unknown reason.
Don't wear a mask because the governor or mayor told you. Wear it to show compassion for your fellow citizens.
Bear a slight inconvenience. Be a bigger person. Do what is best overall for your city, for your state, for your country.
Quit being selfish. This is not a slippery slope to communism. It is common sense.
you just cant stop yourself, can you? does it make you feel better to belittle people online? wow.
Not going to address the actual question, then?
Just going to respond with a personal attack, it seems.
Wow.
See, it is not that hard to stoop to your form of debating a topic as well.
where was the question in your post? looks like a directive/imperative to me. happy to answer actual question presented in good faith. otherwise, I'm done wasting my time with you.
I actually do not know your stance. You seem to have taken offense to my stance of:
"Those who refuse to wear a mask because it is not 100% effective against stopping the wearer from getting Covid are not being honest for their reasons, and they do not have a good reason to wear not one"
And that is what toolshed started with the converation about beards and it getting in through your eyes. "Since the mask is not as effective in edge cases then we should not even wear them at all. "
Which goes against all common sense.
Twisting my words a bit, but thanks for trying. My point was, if government can mandate you wear a mask, what happens if that doesn't slow the spread. Hypothetically, since masks are less effective with facial hair, do we allow government to tell us to shave, or what facial hair is acceptable. You know, to slow the spread, save lives and all. The point of my posts were government mandating things, taking freedoms a little at a time.
But you've twisted that to mean that I am adamantly anti mask, that I won't wear a mask, that I am selfish or have no common sense. I wear them when asked, I wore one this morning taking my son into his daycare. But yesterday, when we arrived at a restaurant to eat lunch, and the sign on the door said "Do not enter without a mask" we chose to take our business elsewhere, to a place that didn't require it to open the door and get a table. We also chose to sit outside, because science says you are less likely to get it outside. I am an adult, with thinking skills and can make choices based on the data available to move forward and care for myself and my family in a way that we safely chose to.
I am all for listening to science and following the guidelines. But what if I have a paper/ research that's different or opposite of yours? Who do we go with? The one that is safer/ more proactive? Do we apply the same logic to driving? I mean, if no one drives, it would save thousands of lives every year to auto accidents. Even if we ration driving, and say you can only drive 2-3 times a week, it would save lives. Nobody swimming would save thousands of lives every year to drowning.
Again, I don't agree with you 100%, but I do agree with some things you have said. Again, that's OK if we don't agree 100%. You've called them "edge cases" but provided no statistics to back up that claim. I don't blindly follow logic because someone calls it truth.