Driving with Bright Lights on?

5,218 Views | 28 Replies | Last: 6 yr ago by TXTransplant
Finding X
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This has been really starting to bug me. People used to dim their light when they drive up behind someone or when another car approaches but over the past couple of years they don't. I flash them and they leave them going.
I told my wife that it's probably 1 in 10 so we started counting. It was 1 out of 8 consistently from Cameron to Bryan. Some dim but a lot don't.

Am I the only one noticing this?
Photoguy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I have noticed the same thing.
Scoopen Skwert
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
One of the many things that prove common courtesy is not so common now a day.
GSS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Or they replaced their fog lamps with the latest "tacticool mega-lumens" bulb, and hey, since they in the fog lamp housing, it's okay to ALWAYS have them on...
Oogway
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Just to clarify, OP, are you referring to drivers who leave their 'brights' on and then don't dim them for others? If so, I agree, I do see that frequently, but I also sometimes find those newer type headlights so glaring that they look like 'brights.' As far as folks not dimming their lights after you've flashed yours, I have flashed people driving late at night when they have zero lights on and they drive on through the darkness completely oblivious, ensconced in their own little dreamy world on wheels.
carpe vinum
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Another cool technological advancement is that lights have an adjustment knob (up/down).
Obviously the further up they are the better you can see...
Probably a few that adjusted a knob to see better, and don't realize or don't care they are blinding the recipient.
BrandoC
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
New after market bulbs are just brighter than you think.
Aggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Many times someone behind me has brights on... I just raise my side view mirrors and reflect light right back at em.
They usually dim them after that.

Worse than people driving with brights on.. Is the amount of people that drive in BCS at night with no lights on.
You cannot drive down texas Ave at night without seeing at least 1 car with no lights on.
How much do you not have to be paying attention to not realize you're driving with no lights on??
4lilmonkeys
How long do you want to ignore this user?
In my experience, there are actually more people around here driving with no headlights on at all. Night, day, rain, fog, blizzard, cats and dogs living together, mass hysteria...doesn't seem to matter to them. Headlights are optional.
Esteban du Plantier
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
HID bulbs are bright and more and more new cars are equipped with them from the factory.

It's only going to get worse, so you better get square with it.
DBSwooper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Esteban du Plantier said:

HID bulbs are bright and more and more new cars are equipped with them from the factory.

It's only going to get worse, so you better get square with it.
The toss in all the wonderful people who have non-compliant lighting for headlights, which besides being the wrong color temperature (which can appear more dazzling to some), are often diffused incorrectly or aimed wrong. Curious? TC547.3215 which references 49CFR571.108 of the FMVSS.
ratfacemcdougal
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PSA...The greatest percentage of driving time, headlights are more about BEING SEEN than seeing. Not that it really matters to all of the fine law abiding citizens, but North Carolina had a driving law that required headlights to be on in ALL low light conditions....fog, any rain ,dusk, dawn, etc.
txyaloo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
DBSwooper said:

Esteban du Plantier said:

HID bulbs are bright and more and more new cars are equipped with them from the factory.

It's only going to get worse, so you better get square with it.
The toss in all the wonderful people who have non-compliant lighting for headlights, which besides being the wrong color temperature (which can appear more dazzling to some), are often diffused incorrectly or aimed wrong. Curious? TC547.3215 which references 49CFR571.108 of the FMVSS.
Does local LE ever focus on this? I never see brodozers with light bars or cars with 8k HIDs or HIDs in non-projector housings being stopped. The last few years, I've wished the state would have a "click it or ticket" type event to focus on these jokers.
Oogway
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I agree, being seen by other drivers is what the folks driving w/o headlights fail to realize sometimes. A dark car that pulls out in front of others, is making a turn, or is in a line of cars who are lit up (hence becoming a 'dark space') is dangerous. Pedestrians can also have difficulty seeing an unlit car, too (although if the car is traveling slowly, there may be other ways to tell it is approaching). The lighting at parking areas can fool people into not following driving procedure and checking their lights before leaving as well. Or they're drunk. Or something.

As far as the brighter lights go, I try and focus on safe driving and train my eyes as much as I can to not be bothered by them since someone pointed out, they are here to stay.
Jinx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Esteban du Plantier said:

HID bulbs are bright and more and more new cars are equipped with them from the factory.

It's only going to get worse, so you better get square with it.
I have a newish car and make a drive out to "the country" about once a week. I get "flashed" with brights now and then when I have my regular lights on. Sometimes, I'm tempted to hi beam them back to prove I'm not being rude but that'd just blind them entirely...
Picadillo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oncoming brights are bothersome, but what really gets me is people behind you with brights, either stopped at a light or moving.

We are not a civil as we used to be.
saltydog13
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I've noticed that it's especially bad when driving home from work at 5am and even more so in the fog
redsox34
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
txyaloo said:

DBSwooper said:

Esteban du Plantier said:

HID bulbs are bright and more and more new cars are equipped with them from the factory.

It's only going to get worse, so you better get square with it.
The toss in all the wonderful people who have non-compliant lighting for headlights, which besides being the wrong color temperature (which can appear more dazzling to some), are often diffused incorrectly or aimed wrong. Curious? TC547.3215 which references 49CFR571.108 of the FMVSS.
Does local LE ever focus on this? I never see brodozers with light bars or cars with 8k HIDs or HIDs in non-projector housings being stopped. The last few years, I've wished the state would have a "click it or ticket" type event to focus on these jokers.
pretty sure HIDs must be > 10k to be considered illegal in TX
cz308
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I keep my headlights turned down low since they are adjustable from the inside. When I meet other people who do not turn off their brights, I just kindly rotate the lights up and hit the brights. That usually changes their mind fairly quickly.

I also have changed out from halogen to led which makes it worse on their end since it scatters the light some.
DBSwooper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
redsox34 said:

txyaloo said:

DBSwooper said:

Esteban du Plantier said:

HID bulbs are bright and more and more new cars are equipped with them from the factory.

It's only going to get worse, so you better get square with it.
The toss in all the wonderful people who have non-compliant lighting for headlights, which besides being the wrong color temperature (which can appear more dazzling to some), are often diffused incorrectly or aimed wrong. Curious? TC547.3215 which references 49CFR571.108 of the FMVSS.
Does local LE ever focus on this? I never see brodozers with light bars or cars with 8k HIDs or HIDs in non-projector housings being stopped. The last few years, I've wished the state would have a "click it or ticket" type event to focus on these jokers.
pretty sure HIDs must be > 10k to be considered illegal in TX
The color temperature requirements are closer to 5500k, I don't have the conversion chart from the requirements in the FMVSS in front of me but the allowed range is much narrower than people think.

As for if local LE stopped for illegal and dangerous lighting, they have before, they might again, but I'm also doubtful that the average patrol officer would know these details. The motors guys probably do if anyone does. Call your local agency and raise hell with the traffic division, that's the only way to motivate enforcement. Illegal and dangerous lighting can, has and does cause collisions, including tinted lighting (no amount of lens tinting is legal on any of the five required lights in any of the 50 states).
biobioprof
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DBSwooper said:

redsox34 said:

txyaloo said:

DBSwooper said:

Esteban du Plantier said:

HID bulbs are bright and more and more new cars are equipped with them from the factory.

It's only going to get worse, so you better get square with it.
The toss in all the wonderful people who have non-compliant lighting for headlights, which besides being the wrong color temperature (which can appear more dazzling to some), are often diffused incorrectly or aimed wrong. Curious? TC547.3215 which references 49CFR571.108 of the FMVSS.
Does local LE ever focus on this? I never see brodozers with light bars or cars with 8k HIDs or HIDs in non-projector housings being stopped. The last few years, I've wished the state would have a "click it or ticket" type event to focus on these jokers.
pretty sure HIDs must be > 10k to be considered illegal in TX
The color temperature requirements are closer to 5500k, I don't have the conversion chart from the requirements in the FMVSS in front of me but the allowed range is much narrower than people think.

As for if local LE stopped for illegal and dangerous lighting, they have before, they might again, but I'm also doubtful that the average patrol officer would know these details. The motors guys probably do if anyone does. Call your local agency and raise hell with the traffic division, that's the only way to motivate enforcement. Illegal and dangerous lighting can, has and does cause collisions, including tinted lighting (no amount of lens tinting is legal on any of the five required lights in any of the 50 states).
Shouldn't this be picked up at inspection/registration time?
DBSwooper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
biobioprof said:

DBSwooper said:

redsox34 said:

txyaloo said:

DBSwooper said:

Esteban du Plantier said:

HID bulbs are bright and more and more new cars are equipped with them from the factory.

It's only going to get worse, so you better get square with it.
The toss in all the wonderful people who have non-compliant lighting for headlights, which besides being the wrong color temperature (which can appear more dazzling to some), are often diffused incorrectly or aimed wrong. Curious? TC547.3215 which references 49CFR571.108 of the FMVSS.
Does local LE ever focus on this? I never see brodozers with light bars or cars with 8k HIDs or HIDs in non-projector housings being stopped. The last few years, I've wished the state would have a "click it or ticket" type event to focus on these jokers.
pretty sure HIDs must be > 10k to be considered illegal in TX
The color temperature requirements are closer to 5500k, I don't have the conversion chart from the requirements in the FMVSS in front of me but the allowed range is much narrower than people think.

As for if local LE stopped for illegal and dangerous lighting, they have before, they might again, but I'm also doubtful that the average patrol officer would know these details. The motors guys probably do if anyone does. Call your local agency and raise hell with the traffic division, that's the only way to motivate enforcement. Illegal and dangerous lighting can, has and does cause collisions, including tinted lighting (no amount of lens tinting is legal on any of the five required lights in any of the 50 states).
Shouldn't this be picked up at inspection/registration time?
Yes it should, but often it isn't even though there are clear guidelines set forth for MVI stations in Texas with easy to follow rules. There are even guidelines on DPS' website.

A number of years ago I know that DPS used to take MVI sticker numbers that were sent to them as having violations and investigate the offending shop and investigator, often starting with a special car to be inspected. I'm not sure if they do that anymore.
FlyRod
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Lots of olds are moving into BCS. Olds can't see well at night, or any other time (but especially at night). High beams help olds see at night. Better get used to this.
MosesHallRAB83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'm an old at 56. I do not use what at one time was called "high beams". I doubt olds are the problem as they tend to know their light limitations and avoid such situations. I suspect it is more likely mills thinking it is "cool" to have such lights.
Finding X
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I realize that HID and newer cars have brighter light and I can tell the difference between driving lights and high beams. I'm talking about people driving with the highbeams on all the time. They either suck at life or the light behind their eyes is too dim and they are compensating.


saltydog13
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
MosesHallRAB83 said:

I'm an old at 56. I do not use what at one time was called "high beams". I doubt olds are the problem as they tend to know their light limitations and avoid such situations. I suspect it is more likely mills thinking it is "cool" to have such lights.

We're talking about high beams, not light bars.
csrealist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If someone is behind you with their brights on, and you are moving, then you are probably driving too slow and should move over to allow traffic to flow properly.
GSS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
csrealist said:

If someone is behind you with their brights on, and you are moving, then you are probably driving too slow and should move over to allow traffic to flow properly.
Since the post above assumes a LOT, I'll assume the laugh it gave me was unintentional.
saltydog13
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
csrealist said:

If someone is behind you with their brights on, and you are moving, then you are probably driving too slow and should move over to allow traffic to flow properly.

Unless the person with their brights on is going slow in the left lane forcing you to pass them on the right which results in someone with their brights on behind you.
TXTransplant
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jinx said:

Esteban du Plantier said:

HID bulbs are bright and more and more new cars are equipped with them from the factory.

It's only going to get worse, so you better get square with it.
I have a newish car and make a drive out to "the country" about once a week. I get "flashed" with brights now and then when I have my regular lights on. Sometimes, I'm tempted to hi beam them back to prove I'm not being rude but that'd just blind them entirely...


This. I have a car (2012) with Xenon headlights. I NEVER use my high beams. When I was commuting back and forth from College Station to The Woodlands on 105, I got flashed for using my "brights" probably once a day (usually in the early morning, as they was the darkest part of my commute). Now that I'm not commuting, I rarely get flashed anymore, but I've come to expect it on the rare occasion when I'm driving on a dark, rural road.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.