Cool - so you didn't read the apology then did you? If you had, then maybe you wouldn't have felt the need to rush on here and throw your two cents in - because that point was made in the apology:
In the case of the Truman miscalculation, editors called a race too soon and more than 150,000 households held the proof in their hands. Their error was based on an overly confident and conscious decision to take a gamble with election projections rather than wait for the official results.
The Eagle's mistake was not a deliberate untruth or an alternative truth. It was an error made on deadline without enough back-up to catch the oversight. That falls on me.