when back-up sights go wrong

4 things wrong:

1) USA today
2) Let a woman hold a gun
3) No suppressor.
4) Not an EyeGuy AR

Never seen a gal with one of those silicone wedding rings.

TwoMarksHand said:

---

Never seen a gal with one of those silicone wedding rings.

---

Did you just assume his/her/xim/zits gender?

No round chambered, two wedding rings?

Front sight backward and on gas block, EoTech on handguard.

charging handle not seated

That makes my brain hurt, but I'll play.

1. Eotech not mounted on the upper receiver.
2. Magpul BUIS front sight facing the wrong direction.
3. Magpul BUIS front sight gonna melt on that gas block, and probably not on the same plane as rear sight.
4. Charging handle not secured to upper receiver.
5. Magpul BUIS rear sight too far forward.

1) front sight is on backwards

2) sights are reversed

3) The magazine is empty

4) is some kind of badge she's wearing

5)! Who wears 2 rings?

6) charging handle

7) only 1 bar of signal

8) chicken wing grip

And just think: people this ignorant somehow are arrogant enough to think they have a valuable opinion about whether you should own a gun they can't even figure out how to stage for a proper picture.....

No chainsaw attachment

78681AG said:

---

No bcg?

---

It's there, you can see the bolt at the very back of the ejection port.

They slapped an empty mag into the gun and ran the charging handle like they've seen in the movies.

Then they got really confused why the charging handle (is that the shoulder thing that does up?) was just dangling, so they gingerly poked it back into position, sort of.

If they'd ever shot a gun they'd understand how idiotic plastic back up sights on a railed metal gas block is. Or that they'd locked the bolt back. Or how a red dot mounted on a non freefloated hand guard is going to have no concept of a zero, and make the gun front heavy for absolutely no effing reason to boot.

But they don't understand how the gun works. They just know you shouldn't be allowed to own one. Because you're not smart enough to be trusted with one.

Oh, the irony.

BQ_90 said:

---

No chainsaw attachment

---

This reply took for too long to show up.

BenderRodriguez said:

---

78681AG said:

---

No bcg?

---

Then they got really confused why the charging handle (is that the shoulder thing that does up?) was just dangling, so they gingerly poked it back into position, sort of.

---

I'm laughing real hard picturing this scene play out before the photo was taken.

AnScAggie said:

---

Maybe it's David Hogg holding the gun??

---

Hands are too masculine

AggieChemist said:

---

No round chambered, two wedding rings?

---

need one for each of his husbands