Yes, that's exactly what happened there. And it could easily happen in TX.txags92 said:reddog90 said:VA was a pretty gun-friendly state until November '19. This could easily happen in TX.Aggieangler93 said:
I'm hoping it stays peaceful. I cannot imagine that same thing happening in Texas. I would assume we would have already burned the capitol building down and posted snipers on all adjacent buildings, if they tried to limit our 2A rights in this State.
Not one inch.....
The Virginia situation came about from a combination of Soros and Bloomberg deluging state dems with campaign money, Obama's tremendous expansion of the government agencies, and apathy towards the situation by republican voters. I don't think we will have any problems with voter apathy in the next election...
Glow in the dark refers to CIA. Specifically a statement by this dude.McDadeTXAggie said:
What is this boomer and glow in the dark stuff mean?
Quote:
CIA ni***** glow in the dark, you can see them driving.
Except in our case, instead of the flood of government employees coming into Northern Virginia to work in DC, we have a flood of Californians coming to Austin.reddog90 said:Yes, that's exactly what happened there. And it could easily happen in TX.txags92 said:reddog90 said:VA was a pretty gun-friendly state until November '19. This could easily happen in TX.Aggieangler93 said:
I'm hoping it stays peaceful. I cannot imagine that same thing happening in Texas. I would assume we would have already burned the capitol building down and posted snipers on all adjacent buildings, if they tried to limit our 2A rights in this State.
Not one inch.....
The Virginia situation came about from a combination of Soros and Bloomberg deluging state dems with campaign money, Obama's tremendous expansion of the government agencies, and apathy towards the situation by republican voters. I don't think we will have any problems with voter apathy in the next election...
BenderRodriguez said:schmellba99 said:
You vastly over estimate both the resolve of most people and yhe gun friendliness of Texas.
And thousands of them just showed up armed to protest what they view as unconstitutional bills. Not even laws, but the mere introduction of anti gun BS bills that the leftists have introduced and pushed for in the past.
So yeah, I think this may be something a little different from the historical reaction of "okay, I guess we can't make machine guns anymore because you passed an amendment to a bill with an undocumented voice vote".
I could be wrong, but I don't think additional infringements are going to go the way they have in the past.
I didn't say there were NO problems. I want to see factual data that this is a "real" problem.Red Pear Realty said:InfantryAg said:AggieChemist said:
To be fair, we have a real problem with cops executing people and dogs in this country. And it gets worse if you're black
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pecan_Park_raid
I agree with this point. Wikipedia is not a valid source. It can be contributed to by anyone and I'm not sure if it is even vetted. I could care less about dogs, but where does OP come up with a statement about cops executing people? That's far from the norm, and out of how many daily LEO-civilian interactions a day across the USA, would you say someone gets executed?InfantryAg said:I didn't say there were NO problems. I want to see factual data that this is a "real" problem.Red Pear Realty said:InfantryAg said:AggieChemist said:
To be fair, we have a real problem with cops executing people and dogs in this country. And it gets worse if you're black
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pecan_Park_raid
That's like saying we have a real problem with gun crime or schools shootings. It's only a "real" problem because of the news coverage, not the statistics.
Aggieangler93 said:I agree with this point. Wikipedia is not a valid source. It can be contributed to by anyone and I'm not sure if it is even vetted. I could care less about dogs, but where does OP come up with a statement about cops executing people? That's far from the norm, and out of how many daily LEO-civilian interactions a day across the USA, would you say someone gets executed?InfantryAg said:I didn't say there were NO problems. I want to see factual data that this is a "real" problem.Red Pear Realty said:InfantryAg said:AggieChemist said:
To be fair, we have a real problem with cops executing people and dogs in this country. And it gets worse if you're black
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pecan_Park_raid
That's like saying we have a real problem with gun crime or schools shootings. It's only a "real" problem because of the news coverage, not the statistics.
El Chupacabra said:
So when the bills become laws, which they will, will there be 10s of thousands of armed protesters going to Richmond again?
I'm pretty sure the data doesn't bear this out if you mean "fatally shoot." which could me self defense, or not, or could mean exactly what you stated, "execute."AggieChemist said:Get your head out of the sand.InfantryAg said:Source???AggieChemist said:
To be fair, we have a real problem with cops executing people and dogs in this country. And it gets worse if you're black.
because that is BS.
[url=https://www.pnas.org/content/116/32/15877][/url]Now, some have come out against this as flawed analysis, but it was a peer reviewed study, so who is more biased? The researchers, or the folks crying foul? Who really knows.Quote:
In the original study, published on 22 July in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), researchers at Michigan State University and the University of Maryland compiled a list of more than 900 fatal U.S. police shootings in 2015 using crowdsourced databases from The Washington Post and The Guardian. Then, they asked police departments for information about the race of the officers responsible for the shootings. They found black police were more likely to kill black civilians than white civilians. However, the same held true for white and Hispanic officers: Each group of police was likelier to shoot civilians of their own race. That's likely true, the researchers say, because police tend to be drawn from the communities they work in and are thus more likely to have deadly encounters with civilians of the same race. They concluded there were no antiblack or anti-Hispanic disparities across police shootings
If it was yesterday, I can guarantee you there hasn't been time to investigate and determine the facts of the case. Are you saying an investigation showed he was unarmed, compliant, and shot to death? Or are you saying you were there and saw it? Did the shooting victim die? Were there any mitigating circumstances as to why deadly force was used?AggieChemist said:
Cops shot an unarmed man trying to clean their windshield yesterday in Houston.
That happened to me in Houston several times and I always managed to NOT shoot the unarmed hobo.
If that was sarcasm, I sure as hell missed it. My bad!AgEng06 said:
I'm going to guess you aren't very familiar w/ LEJ (or sarcasm). Stick around here a little bit...
take a look at houston and dallas. even on the DISCLOSED money, soros PUT those local politicians in power.reddog90 said:Yes, that's exactly what happened there. And it could easily happen in TX.txags92 said:reddog90 said:VA was a pretty gun-friendly state until November '19. This could easily happen in TX.Aggieangler93 said:
I'm hoping it stays peaceful. I cannot imagine that same thing happening in Texas. I would assume we would have already burned the capitol building down and posted snipers on all adjacent buildings, if they tried to limit our 2A rights in this State.
Not one inch.....
The Virginia situation came about from a combination of Soros and Bloomberg deluging state dems with campaign money, Obama's tremendous expansion of the government agencies, and apathy towards the situation by republican voters. I don't think we will have any problems with voter apathy in the next election...
Sanctuary cities will be up to bat very soon...the VA Dems aren't going to sit back and reflect on the 2A rally.highvelocity said:
Sorry to chime in, but if that does happen, sanctuary cities will be up to bat to put their money where their mouth is. I do think if there is a situation where law enforcement go door to door to confiscate guns, there will be blood
El Chupacabra said:
There won't be a door to door confiscation, that won't be needed. There has been compliance with every law passed to date, don't expect that to change.
The threat of becoming a felon and having your life ruined is enough for people to comply.
I guess I'm jaded. I guess I'll believe it when I see it. I see no reason to believe it is different this time. And they won't stop...ever. And they have more money and more time and influence and judges and voters and corruption to work with. And they know how to play the long game and have done so for generations.BenderRodriguez said:El Chupacabra said:
There won't be a door to door confiscation, that won't be needed. There has been compliance with every law passed to date, don't expect that to change.
The threat of becoming a felon and having your life ruined is enough for people to comply.
I get why you say that. NFA 34, GCA 68, Hughes 86, Import ban 89, AWB 94. I really do. We took it all. Without violence, even without much protesting or civil disobedience.
I'm telling you, it's different this time. The part of your post I bolded is why.
The laws proposed in Virginia will turn law abiding citizens into felons overnight for simply owning an inanimate object. But the thing that makes everything different this time from every past infringement is the Red Flag aspect. Do you have anyone in your life who disagrees with you politically and knows you own guns? If you lived in Virginia, you would be facing a future with a serious risk of being red flagged if these laws pass.
Virginian gun owners right now are contemplating a future with two options. Lose their rights and their property to the legal whims of people who look down on them as "deplorables and nazis"....or start acting like the felons those voters and politicians turned them into.
I know quite a few people who attended the rally. They are not political rally people. Many of them are combat vets. Several of them traveled from several states away to be there. They are people who are very, very opposed to the idea of America being a country where a man has to live in fear of a no knock raid on his house by a SWAT team of the State Security Apparatus because someone reported them anonymously to a Red Flag hotline, where the best outcome is he isn't murdered in front of his family and the Stazi don't find any "illegal" gun contraband to arrest him for possessing.
I was going to waste everyone's time with more of my crap, but instead if you have the time I'd like for you to give this guys quick 6 min speech a listen. He gets it. It is different this time. And I hope to God the people pushing these idiotic ideas figure that out before anyone else gets hurt (I say anyone else because people have already died thanks to red flag orders)