The NFL's Covid-19 Finding That Saved the Season

1,146 Views | 2 Replies | Last: 3 yr ago by CrottyKid
Iraq2xVeteran
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It was early October, and the NFL had a problem. It wasn't just that players and staff for the Tennessee Titans were continuing to test positive in an outbreak that shook the NFL's season. It wasn't even that the league was learning that the virus was able to rush through holes in its protocols.

The NFL was slowly discovering something far deeper: a core tenet of Covid-19 transmission wisdomhow to define when individuals are in "close contact"was just wrong. The safety of interactions during this global pandemic had been for months measured by a stopwatch and a tape measure. The guidance was that someone had been exposed to the virus if they had been within six feet of an infected person for more than 15 minutes. It was drilled into everyone for so long it became coronavirus gospel.

But that wasn't proving true during the NFL's outbreaks. People were testing positive for the virus even though they had spent far less than 15 minutes or weren't within six feet of an infectious personand the league had the contact-tracing technology to prove it.

That was a wake-up call," said Dr. Allen Sills, the NFL's chief medical officer. "We had to be more precise in our definition of high-risk close contacts because clearly transmission could occur outside those basic boundaries of time and distance."

The league's finding is the critical reason why the NFL got through its regular season playing all 256 games and made it all the way to the upcoming Super Bowl on Feb. 7, between the Tampa Bay Buccaneers and Kansas City Chiefs, as scheduled.

From Sept. 27 to Oct. 10, there were a total of 41 cases in the league. Of those, 21 were believed to have come from transmission within an individual teama finding boosted by genomic sequencing. Those 21 cases yielded fascinating insights. Twelve had no close interactions of at least 15 consecutive minutes with a confirmed positive. Eight had no interactions of even five consecutive minutes. Seven had no interactions that cumulatively added up to 15 minutes with any confirmed positives.

Right around the Titans' outbreak, in October, a similar lesson came from a Vermont prison. An investigation there confirmed that cumulative brief interactions exceeding 15 minutes could lead to transmission. It didn't have to be 15 consecutive minutes, leading the CDC to change its definition of a close contact to a cumulative 15 minutes over the course of 24 hours.

But it was the NFL that had enough data to indicate something even bigger. There were still those seven cases where even the cumulative interactions were under 15 minutesand the virus was still transmitted.
It also wasn't simply time. It was distance, too. The virus, in some instances, traveled farther than six feetespecially in small, poorly ventilated areas. And masks, more than the duration of contact, seemed to matter a lot.
From then on, the NFL moved away from "within six feet for more than 15 minutes" as its defensive posture or its exposure rule. Those who were exposed had to spend five days testing negative in isolation in order to return. "We had to adapt and change our approaches," said Jeff Miller, the NFL's executive vice president who oversees health and safety.

The league introduced new, strict rules for any team with a single positive. It started testing seven days a week, instead of six. Most critically, it supercharged its contact tracing to consider context that the movement-tracking devices couldn't detect. A masked encounter outdoors could then be treated differently than an unmasked shared car ride, for instance.

While the NFL's virus rates grew higher over the latter half of the season, a reflection of the growing case counts across the country, the data in the CDC paper indicate how much worse it could have been if not for these changes. From Oct. 15 to Nov. 11, 20 people who were identified as high-risk close contacts wound up testing positive for Covid-19. That means they had already been isolated before they could spread the virus to anyone else inside their teams. Those 20 cases could have created far more otherwise.

The intensive protocols the NFL implemented in October, for any team that had a positive case, also significantly reduced close encounters. Teams under those restrictions saw their median number of interactions of within six feet for at least 15 minutes decrease by 60%. The number of interactions that lasted even two minutes fell by 28%. Later, the NFL made the intensive protocols the new standard protocols. And they lasted all the way to the Super Bowl.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/super-bowl-nfl-covid-cdc-11612104460
MookieBlaylock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I guess I dont understand what is amazing about this
Iraq2xVeteran
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
MookieBlaylock said:

I guess I dont understand what is amazing about this
I read the print version of this article, and it was titled, 'NFL Season Turned Into a Covid-19 Study.' yesterday. Sports leagues, in their extreme motivation to play through a pandemic, have generated an unrivaled trove of data and case studies of how the virus is and isn't transmitted. No other organizations have had large groups of the same people doing a variety of activities together, for weeks at a time, while also spending millions of dollars to track their movements and test them daily with fast-turnaround results.

The NFL, the country's richest league with thousands of personnel across the country, was the clearest case of this. The league, in essence, had snapshots of 32 communities across the country. From Aug. 1 through Jan. 23, it conducted 954,830 tests, on more than 7,000 people a week during the regular season, and confirmed 724 positive cases.

Andrew Beaton and Louise Radnofsky wrote an excellent analysis about the NFL's Covid-19. After the new findings, the NFL adapted their protocols and were able to reschedule multiple NFL games to complete all 256 regular season games. By contrast, numerous FBS games were cancelled.
CrottyKid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Guess what else we learned?
A positive test does not prove a positive case. Instead, it is one part of what should be a constellation of indicators leading to a diagnosis of Covid-19.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.