Will Fuller vs BAL
Mike Evans vs CAR
Mike Evans vs CAR
Close call...Ruggs16Ag18 said:
Henry Ruggs vs NO(17)
Alan Lazard vs DET(27)
I wouldn't run the Pats D against the Seahawks personally.W said:
anyone starting the New England defense at Seattle?
have thought about streaming the Seattle defense vs. Cam and the Patriots instead
Might also be a good play to pick up Scott Miller if Godwin is out.Saint Pablo said:
Chris Godwin in concussion protocol. Does this mean he will be out this week? Does anyone have any insight into what exactly that means lol because my opponent has Godwin and I have Evans this week. So if Godwin took a week off, it would be a win-win.
I would absolutely start Ridley over robinson.oh no said:
i worry a little about chasing ridley's week 1 points until i see that kind of target volume two weeks in a row, but I think i might still start him over robinson.
I think i'd lean edelman- assuming PPR. but if golladay is still out for DET, i'd consider marvin.
Tom Kazansky 2012 said:I would absolutely start Ridley over robinson.oh no said:
i worry a little about chasing ridley's week 1 points until i see that kind of target volume two weeks in a row, but I think i might still start him over robinson.
I think i'd lean edelman- assuming PPR. but if golladay is still out for DET, i'd consider marvin.
That being said, robinson needs to be targeted for Trade bukkaki to acquire him. He has the nicest schedule of any WR IMO, that and Anthony Miller should be picked up as well
After the Falcons traded Mohamed Sanu last year, Ridley saw an uptick in targets. He saw 7, 5, 8, 10, 14, 10, and 5 targets in the games he played after that trade. The last 5 was a game in which Ridley got injured and missed the rest of the season. It seems like the volume will remain consistent, especially with their defense failing to hold up and them falling behind in games. I'd play Ridley and Robinson if you could.oh no said:
i worry a little about chasing ridley's week 1 points until i see that kind of target volume two weeks in a row, but I think i might still start him over robinson.
I think i'd lean edelman- assuming PPR. but if golladay is still out for DET, i'd consider marvin.
yes it's weird. stop it.16Ag18 said:
Is it weird that I'm thinking of starting Burrow tonight vs Clev and sitting Russell Wilson vs the Pats?
Saint Pablo said:After the Falcons traded Mohamed Sanu last year, Ridley saw an uptick in targets. He saw 7, 5, 8, 10, 14, 10, and 5 targets in the games he played after that trade. The last 5 was a game in which Ridley got injured and missed the rest of the season. It seems like the volume will remain consistent, especially with their defense failing to hold up and them falling behind in games. I'd play Ridley and Robinson if you could.oh no said:
i worry a little about chasing ridley's week 1 points until i see that kind of target volume two weeks in a row, but I think i might still start him over robinson.
I think i'd lean edelman- assuming PPR. but if golladay is still out for DET, i'd consider marvin.
Do you not have to start two WRs? How did you end up w CEH and CMC?!awrollins said:Saint Pablo said:After the Falcons traded Mohamed Sanu last year, Ridley saw an uptick in targets. He saw 7, 5, 8, 10, 14, 10, and 5 targets in the games he played after that trade. The last 5 was a game in which Ridley got injured and missed the rest of the season. It seems like the volume will remain consistent, especially with their defense failing to hold up and them falling behind in games. I'd play Ridley and Robinson if you could.oh no said:
i worry a little about chasing ridley's week 1 points until i see that kind of target volume two weeks in a row, but I think i might still start him over robinson.
I think i'd lean edelman- assuming PPR. but if golladay is still out for DET, i'd consider marvin.
Fortunately, I have the luxury of choosing one or the other, as I have CEH, McCaffrey, and Jonathon Taylor. Todd Gurley on the bench as well