2010s NFL All Decade Team

3,013 Views | 14 Replies | Last: 4 yr ago by BMX Bandit
Saint Pablo
How long do you want to ignore this user?


A couple Ags on there. Any thoughts?
gigem1223
How long do you want to ignore this user?
To me Brees should be in over Rodgers, can make a case for D Ware as well.
Saint Pablo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rodgers winning a Super Bowl this decade is probably what put him in...I could see the case being made for either of them. There is a legitimate argument for Russell Wilson too IMO.
johnnyg88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Saint Pablo said:



A couple Ags on there. Any thoughts?
Justin Tucker, unanimous selection.
Goldie Wilson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Tyrann Mathieu seems a bit out of place
Head Ninja In Charge
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
How was Gronkowski not a unanimous selection?
Saint Pablo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Good question.
Fat Bib Fortuna
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Head Ninja In Charge said:

How was Gronkowski not a unanimous selection?
He missed 29 games between 2012-2018 and didn't play in 2019.

Kelce has missed 1 game since 2014.

Gronk has 521 catches for 7,861 yards and 79 TDs in 115 games.

Kelce has 507 catches for 6,465 yards and 38 TDs in 96 games.

Gronk's TD's make him far and away the favorite, but Kelce catches more passes per game and they are less than 1 yard apart in yards per game. Kelce is clearly more durable.

Also Gronk had 4 1,00-yard seasons in his career. Kelce's had four straight, averaging 1,182 yards per season.

The touchdown gap is enormous, but Kelce stands up across the board everywhere else, and has played in 95 of 96 possible games since 2014,
Goldie Wilson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Would be interested to see how Witten's numbers stack up relative to Gronk and Kelce
BMX Bandit
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Witten had 1 first team and 1 second team all pro in the decade

Kelce 2 & 2

Gronk 4 first team
ApachePilot
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Saint Pablo said:

Rodgers winning a Super Bowl this decade is probably what put him in...I could see the case being made for either of them. There is a legitimate argument for Russell Wilson too IMO.


Wilson would have made it if Pete ran the damn ball from the goal line! That SB would have changed a lot.
Fat Bib Fortuna
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Dan 07 said:

Would be interested to see how Witten's numbers stack up relative to Gronk and Kelce


Well dude, go look it up
Saint Pablo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Dan 07 said:

Tyrann Mathieu seems a bit out of place
One Pro Bowl and two All Pro Selections...seems a bit odd.
BMX Bandit
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Fitz: 1 2nd team all pro in decade
DHop: 3 first team 1 2nd team all pro in decade
Goldie Wilson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BMX Bandit said:

Fitz: 1 2nd team all pro in decade
DHop: 3 first team 1 2nd team all pro in decade
They probably didnt want to have two WR spots taken up by Cardinals
BMX Bandit
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Then they should have picked the more deserving one
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.