BrazosDog02 said:
For me, the toughest thing about having a resume written is having lived the resume. After 11 years of stuff, day in and day out, and being quite proud of it all, I want everything on it and am perfectly fine with a 3 page resume.
The problem is that there is a 100% chance the idiot first reading it has no clue about the job he's sifting resumes for. Ironically, the first one looking at these isn't qualified for the hiring of the position except in extremely rare cases. The fact is, my job was vitally important…but everything I did for 11 years wasnt. The trick is to have it present and be dumbed down to a level that someone in HR can quickly make a decision about to get it to the next level. The problem with my resume is that it was jammed with technical things I deemed important that probably glazed the eyes of the HR person…..if they can't figure out what I did, that resume is going in the junk pile.
It would be like me sorting resumes of heart surgeons.
I believe this is the goal.
If I'm looking for a heart surgeon, I'm look to see if someone is an MD.
Then I look to see if they have done heart surgery on the resume.
When sifting through resumes, you're not looking to see if someone is good enough to be a heart surgeon, you're looking for someone that has done what you're looking for.
It's up to a heart surgeon to determine if that person is any good.
If you understand the process, you'll have better success and won't be too jaded.