***Iran [Military Action Thread]***[See Staff Note in OP]

1,990,335 Views | 9182 Replies | Last: 2 min ago by GAC06
Ag87H2O
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It's abundantly clear the Iranians are stalling, not negotiating. It's time for Trump to go after the next round of targets and leave no doubt the only terms are our terms. I appreciate the patience and attempt to deal with this rationally, but the Islamic regime does not come to the table in good faith. Enough is enough. The only thing that will move them is raw power.
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
2026NCAggies said:

docb said:

Maybe Xi can figure out a way to make the Iranians open the Strait. I think he's more likely to get it done than Trump.

China has been trying with no luck, hell a Iranian Representative even visited China a week ago and nothing came of it

Iran actually fired at one of the Chinese ships

I do not think Iran is willing to listen to anybody regarding the strait. That is literally their only card in all of this.

Which is why idk why we have not resumed the mission to get it open.

We should be blowing away all the fast boats we can see but we let 300 of them in the water? WTF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

That was a HUGE opportunity to make a huge blow against them and we let it pass WTF


I can only assume one of two things (or why not both):

1. Trump is hoping to get firm commitment from China to lean on Iran after this summit so he was waiting to see outcome of this. We don't know if Xi actually leaned on Iran when they visited earlier.

2. He's still trying to avoid a confrontation with Congress over War Powers Act and all of the political fallout that would entail.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
3. There is no urgent need from a US perspective to reopen the SoH or to resume bombing Iran.

The WPA is irrelevant. Even the Dems have let it go.

Certainly whilst in China and discussing Iran there was going to extend the pause.

With China visit wrapping up and heading into a weekend, could we see some activity? Maybe. But there does not seem to be great urgency on relighting the candle.
sts7049
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

There is no urgent need from a US perspective to reopen the SoH

it is very much in the US and other countries' best interest to get it open ASAP
Bulldog73
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

There is no urgent need from a US perspective to reopen the SoH or to resume bombing Iran.

Unless you want $4-5/gallon gasoline driving up inflation going into the midterms. If that little thing makes it urgent, then yeah, no.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
sts7049 said:

Quote:

There is no urgent need from a US perspective to reopen the SoH

it is very much in the US and other countries' best interest to get it open ASAP
Deerdude
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I can see a strategy of allowing our refrain to embolden them and expose more fast boats. We can't kill them if we can not find them and I guarantee that we now know where they were hiding them.
He Who Shall Be Unnamed
How long do you want to ignore this user?
flown-the-coop said:

sts7049 said:

Quote:

There is no urgent need from a US perspective to reopen the SoH

it is very much in the US and other countries' best interest to get it open ASAP



We might not need the petroleum products that flow through the Strait (to the degree that Asia and Europe do), but we definitely need aluminum, sulfur, fertilizers, methanol, and a host of other products that are produced in the region and transported there.
Science Denier
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

Which is why idk why we have not resumed the mission to get it open.


Maybe we are going to let the other ME countries do it? That would be best for us, but I have my doubts that will happen.
sts7049
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
food prices are on the rise already because of high fuel costs. Just wait until the high prices of fertilizer start hitting.
Bondag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
flown-the-coop said:

sts7049 said:

Quote:

There is no urgent need from a US perspective to reopen the SoH

it is very much in the US and other countries' best interest to get it open ASAP



Could Iraq build a pipeline similar to Saudi to the west?

Can UAE build one through Oman.

I know that won't happen overnight but you can't let Iran hold this many countries hostage whenever they want.
LMCane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bondag said:

flown-the-coop said:

sts7049 said:

Quote:

There is no urgent need from a US perspective to reopen the SoH

it is very much in the US and other countries' best interest to get it open ASAP




Could Iraq build a pipeline similar to Saudi to the west?

Can UAE build one through Oman.

I know that won't happen overnight but you can't let Iran hold this many countries hostage whenever they want.


yes these have all been planned for decades but were not cost effective

now they are cost effective

Netanyahu literally spoke about pipelines a year ago from Saudi to Haifa Port
AgFan1974
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LMCane said:

Bondag said:

flown-the-coop said:

sts7049 said:

Quote:

There is no urgent need from a US perspective to reopen the SoH

it is very much in the US and other countries' best interest to get it open ASAP




Could Iraq build a pipeline similar to Saudi to the west?

Can UAE build one through Oman.

I know that won't happen overnight but you can't let Iran hold this many countries hostage whenever they want.


yes these have all been planned for decades but were not cost effective

now they are cost effective

Netanyahu literally spoke about pipelines a year ago from Saudi to Haifa Port

You can get pipe in the ground, or under sea, pretty quick given the right resources. There would be no shortage of dollars available for those projects/resources. Drop in the bucket when compared to dollars not realized due to SOH stalemate.

BlueSmoke
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Captain Obvious response here - but why are we not parking a dozen Reaper Drones with Hellfire's above the waterways to intercept any small boats that pop up.
TAMUallen
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BlueSmoke said:

Captain Obvious response here - but why are we not parking a dozen Reaper Drones with Hellfire's above the waterways to intercept any small boats that pop up.


Cost benefit and missile supply numbers? Optics of successfully taking out pesky gofast boats while not receiving damage to show the world they can trust the US presence and encouraging other nations to join in by demonstrating the minimal actual risk?
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BlueSmoke said:

Captain Obvious response here - but why are we not parking a dozen Reaper Drones with Hellfire's above the waterways to intercept any small boats that pop up.

I've not figured that out one bit. Between the MQ-4's, E-3/2 aircraft (plus an Aussie E-7 I think?), and satellites, plus knowing they really have no night operations capability, I just can't wrap my head around how they can put out small boat swarms that last more than 10 minutes on the water.

We have the resources available to quickly identify and destroy these pests. They aren't in the middle of some big fishing operations.
deddog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Tailgate88 said:

I'm a Trump guy too, and frustrated too, but I have noticed he always seems to be a couple steps ahead. I am hoping and praying this is another of those times. The blockade is hurting them and the longer it goes on the more frustrated the populace will get, and hopefully that encourages them to rise up when the time is right.

But no bombs are dropping until AF1 is safely out of Chinese air space, so we have a few days to wait for the next big move I think.

Trump has repeatedly been multiple steps ahead. I don't think being on AF1 in Chinese airspace will stop him. I think the chances of doing this in Chinese airspace are higher, just to prove a point.
Deerdude
How long do you want to ignore this user?
nortex97 said:

BlueSmoke said:

Captain Obvious response here - but why are we not parking a dozen Reaper Drones with Hellfire's above the waterways to intercept any small boats that pop up.

I've not figured that out one bit. Between the MQ-4's, E-3/2 aircraft (plus an Aussie E-7 I think?), and satellites, plus knowing they really have no night operations capability, I just can't wrap my head around how they can put out small boat swarms that last more than 10 minutes on the water.

We have the resources available to quickly identify and destroy these pests. They aren't in the middle of some big fishing operations.


Probably because A-10's way cooler to watch.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I think it's just the optics and not any capability concern.

To be honest, the ability to act if needed would seem to me to be the real reason Hegseth tagged along (and is with POTUS a lot, like a lot).

It may seem petty, but I think there is something to not initiating military action when on a state visit to a country who is allied (however loosely) with the target of your attacks.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Not paying their soldiers is...a big deal.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I just saw a clip of him saying this. Said for 3 days they have not shown any loading at Kharg Island indicating the storage is full (I don't know enough about what he was specifically referring to regarding the satellite recon).

Meanwhile all you see from MSM are fictional stories of how the world will run out of everything in 3 weeks if we don't surrender to Iran. Anonymous sources and all…
AgFan1974
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BlueSmoke said:

Captain Obvious response here - but why are we not parking a dozen Reaper Drones with Hellfire's above the waterways to intercept any small boats that pop up.

We have sent a few to the sea floor in isolated situations from what I have seen. We have not yet seen kinetic action against the large groups that are being sent out (hundreds by reports), to my knowledge.

I wonder if we have ROE that make it difficult to get clearance on a surge of 50, 100, 200 boats that randomly deploy and move in tight groups? The first thing that popped in my mind is the possibility of crewing 10% - 20% of those vessels with fisherman, wakeboarders, or any non-military personnel for that matter.

Those devils would love to feed our media that story and those images. Our media would love it too.

Just a thought. Im sure some of our military folks have a better understanding of how ROE works in this context.
2026NCAggies
How long do you want to ignore this user?
[Stop bypassing obscenity filters -- Staff]

American Hardwood
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BlueSmoke said:

Captain Obvious response here - but why are we not parking a dozen Reaper Drones with Hellfire's above the waterways to intercept any small boats that pop up.


Taking these boats out would be easy. There are scores of videos of us doing just that to drug boats. This is a matter of choice.

Personally, I think we are still playing the 'ceasefire' game while everyone gets to chew on the situation a bit. But strategically, I think we are just doing a rope-a-dope on Iran in the Straight. Let them run around in their ineffective speedboats and feel emboldened by the lack of an American response. But we are watching, waiting, and giving them opportunity to make mistakes in their desperate need to show the world how they are 'winning' while not actually achieving a darn thing that we aren't allowing them to. When the time comes to deal with this joke of a navy, it will be swift and decisive.
LMCane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BlueSmoke said:

Captain Obvious response here - but why are we not parking a dozen Reaper Drones with Hellfire's above the waterways to intercept any small boats that pop up.

who says that we aren't?!

other than dumb idiots who have no concept of what is actually happening 7000 miles away

CENTCOM Commander Brad Cooper LITERALLY just stated in the past day

that they are seeing "only 2 or 3 fast boats from Iran every day now"
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yea I was not sure where folks are getting 300 fast boats daily. Seems Iran has about a 3 to 4 boat / missile / rock capacity to attack these days.
American Hardwood
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I too question where this is coming from. I haven't seen anyone source this 'fact'.
Bondag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
American Hardwood said:

BlueSmoke said:

Captain Obvious response here - but why are we not parking a dozen Reaper Drones with Hellfire's above the waterways to intercept any small boats that pop up.


Taking these boats out would be easy. There are scores of videos of us doing just that to drug boats. This is a matter of choice.

Personally, I think we are still playing the 'ceasefire' game while everyone gets to chew on the situation a bit. But strategically, I think we are just doing a rope-a-dope on Iran in the Straight. Let them run around in their ineffective speedboats and feel emboldened by the lack of an American response. But we are watching, waiting, and giving them opportunity to make mistakes in their desperate need to show the world how they are 'winning' while not actually achieving a darn thing that we aren't allowing them to. When the time comes to deal with this joke of a navy, it will be swift and decisive.

Seems likely that we are using the drones to follow them back to the shore and then seeing where they travel from there.
AgFan1974
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LMCane said:

BlueSmoke said:

Captain Obvious response here - but why are we not parking a dozen Reaper Drones with Hellfire's above the waterways to intercept any small boats that pop up.

who says that we aren't?!

other than dumb idiots who have no concept of what is actually happening 7000 miles away

CENTCOM Commander Brad Cooper LITERALLY just stated in the past day

that they are seeing "only 2 or 3 fast boats from Iran every day now"

To be fair, there are images circulating of large fleets being deployed. Maybe not recently but certainly in the last week or so. In the current media environment I do not think having a misunderstanding of what is happening 7000 miles away makes one an idiot.

If you have military experience, or private sector experience for that matter, that enables you to see through some of the BS, that is great. You should share. I think that is precisely what they were requesting.

ETA:


No clue if WindwardAI is reliable but here is what they have to say about it.
MouthBQ98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
These boats are basically coastal center console fishing boats in the 25-30 foot range with a machine gun pintle mount on the bow. They can hide them in coastal warehouses or tunnels that open to the water. We're probably closely watching where they emerge from and building a target list for when negotiations go nowhere. Then we'll destroy them a bunch at a time.
2000AgPhD
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AgFan1974 said:

LMCane said:

BlueSmoke said:

Captain Obvious response here - but why are we not parking a dozen Reaper Drones with Hellfire's above the waterways to intercept any small boats that pop up.

who says that we aren't?!

other than dumb idiots who have no concept of what is actually happening 7000 miles away

CENTCOM Commander Brad Cooper LITERALLY just stated in the past day

that they are seeing "only 2 or 3 fast boats from Iran every day now"

To be fair, there are images circulating of large fleets being deployed. Maybe not recently but certainly in the last week or so. In the current media environment I do not think having a misunderstanding of what is happening 7000 miles away makes one an idiot.

If you have military experience, or private sector experience for that matter, that enables you to see through some of the BS, that is great. You should share. I think that is precisely what they were requesting.

ETA:


No clue if WindwardAI is reliable but here is what they have to say about it.

This is the problem with sites like WindwardAI. No context. Are the boats mobile? Tied up at a dock somewhere? How are they tracking them? Are they even Iranian? Iran probably isn't the only Guilf state with speedboats. If we go kinetic again those numbers, if even legitimate, will decrease very quickly.
sts7049
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
i am becoming less convinced that the strait can be opened with military options. it's far too much of a whack-a-mole game.

iran is going to have to be pressured economically to cave. which can be done in time, but by the time that much time passes the global damage could be substantial.
GAC06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Agreed. It's just too easy to take shots at tankers a variety of ways
SeaAg010607
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Not sure what those fast boats consume as far as fuel, but taking out the fuel sources or ability to easily refuel them might be easier or have an impact that slows them down and makes them more exposed. Start with the dock fuel stations and work your way up the supply /pipeline chain. If they require a large group of pick trucks running gas cans to a gas station 5 miles each way to fill one boat the targets get a lot bigger.

Also not sure of our ability to deploy mines or the laws thereof, but why not return the favor and mine their ports or critical avenues of approach like blockading their blockade.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Admiral Cooper on military status, including proxies:
Quote:

Cooper also said that the operations have been successful in effectively cutting Iran off from being able to provide weapons and support to its proxy partners in the region, such as Hamas, Hezbollah and the Houthis.

"The defense industrial rates for their drones, and their missiles and their Navy were degraded by 90 percent. They have about 10 percent left," Cooper said, although in this written testimony, he wrote the degradation was at 85 percent. "For the Navy, my military assessment would be that the Navy will not begin to rebuild for five to 10 years."

In his written testimony, Cooper stated the US has eliminated over 90 percent of Iran's "once-massive inventory" of over 8,000 naval mines and has conducted over 700 airstrikes on Iranian "naval mine targets."

"In sum, Iran's navy can no longer claim to be a maritime power, and it cannot project into the Gulf of Oman or the Indian Ocean," he wrote. "Iran retains nuisance capability harassment, low-end drone and rocket attacks, and residual proxy support but it no longer possesses the means to threaten major regional operations or to deter U.S. freedom of action in the air or maritime domains.

During a joint hearing with CENTCOM and US Africa Command, Cooper told members of the Senate Armed Services Committee that the all along for Operation Epic Fury was to accomplish three goals: degrade Iran's ballistic missile and the defense industrial base that supports it, degrade Iran's drones its industrial base and degrade the Navy and its coinciding industrial base.

Good.
First Page Last Page
Page 251 of 264
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.