"We . . . hold that Plaintiffs' grievances do not fall within the scope of our state's public nuisance statute," the decision reads, "and Plaintiffs' allegations do not support a claim for . . . unjust enrichment."
The court rejected the plaintiffs' argument that the "lingering consequences" of the massacre created a public nuisance: "The continuing blight alleged . . . implicates generational-societal inequities that can only be resolved by policymakersnot the courts."
https://legalinsurrection.com/2024/06/oklahoma-supreme-court-rejects-reparations-claim-for-tulsa-race-massacre/
race grifters trying to get free money from an event that occurred over a century ago
oklahoma is having none of it
The court rejected the plaintiffs' argument that the "lingering consequences" of the massacre created a public nuisance: "The continuing blight alleged . . . implicates generational-societal inequities that can only be resolved by policymakersnot the courts."
https://legalinsurrection.com/2024/06/oklahoma-supreme-court-rejects-reparations-claim-for-tulsa-race-massacre/
race grifters trying to get free money from an event that occurred over a century ago
oklahoma is having none of it