President Kamala Harris

52,590 Views | 435 Replies | Last: 1 day ago by ts5641
Stat Monitor Repairman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Beginning to see some trickle truth now as to the unprecedented nature of Kamala, and the biggest political turnaround of all time. Professional commentators catching up to where this thread was 3-weeks ago.

The least popular VP in history, polled at 1% in 2020, didn't carry a a single primary state got overwhelming support with the flip of a switch. Wild times.
Stat Monitor Repairman
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Executive branch puts Tulsi Gabbard on terrorist watchlist as payback for wrecking Kamala's ass at the debate 4 years ago. Nice little shot across the bow to keep her in check. Seems like she fighting back though.
Stat Monitor Repairman
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Uncovered 9-million votes!

30-days ago Kamala was polling as the least popular VP of all time, and nobody knew who Tim was outside of Minnesota.

We looking at the greatest political turnaround of all time.
Stat Monitor Repairman
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Experts struggle to explain.
GigEmADED
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Florida is probably Redder than Texas nowadays. Also any female below 27 that are "undecided", and care about politics . Are not "undecided" they are miserable and are die hard democrats that are brain dead
Agit8r
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
LMCane said:


...and the hardcore Trump supporters could only throw endless insults at us rather than debate the issues.

Harris is LITERALLY the weakest democrat candidate they could put up - and still is going to beat Trump (again!)

we warned all the people for more than a year this exact scenario would occur.
But, but...there's SOOOOoooo many issues to debate the dems on and their policies; wheredayastart: (I say start with the last one and go from there)

Democrats: the party of hypocrisy, not democracy.
Democrats: the party of censorship.
Democrats: the party of hate & bigotry.
Democrats: the party of division & demagoguery.
Democrats: the party of identity politics.
Democrats: the party of corruption.
Democrats: the party of tax hikes.
Democrats: the party of big spending.
Democrats: the party against energy independence.
Democrats: the anti-police party.
Democrats: the party of defund the police.
Democrats: the party soft on crime.
Democrats: the party of control/authoritarians.
Democrats: the party of political persecution.
Democrats: the party of voting rights for illegal aliens.
Democrats: the party of racists.
Democrats: the party of mis-management.
Democrats: the party of weak foreign policy
Democrats: the party of business foreclosures.
Democrats: the party of radicals and anarchists.
Democrats: the party of open borders.
Democrats: the party of welfare for illegal aliens.
Democrats: the party for free health care for illegal aliens.
Democrats: the party of no bail for criminals
Democrats: the party of fraud(s).
Democrats: the party of anti-Semitism.
Democrats: the party of gullible fools.
Democrats: the party of wokeism.
Democrats: the party of pronouns.
Democrats: The party of baby killers
Democrats: the party of gender change for children.
Democrats: the party of drugs for the homeless.
Democrats: the anti-military party
Democrats: the party of govt. weaponization
Democrats: the party of hoaxes
Democrats: the party of climate hysteria.
Democrats: the party of late term abortions.
Democrats: the party of violence.
Democrats: the party of lies & deceit.
Democrats: the party of "let me decide what mis/dis-information is".
Democrats: the party of intolerance.
Democrats: the party of "the establishment"
Democrats: the party of socialists.
Democrats: the party of Marxists.
Democrats: the party full of communists.
Democrats: the party that our enemies support.
Democrats: the party of elites & wealthy.
Democrats: The party of two-tier justice system.
Democrats: the party of lawfare.
Democrats: the party of sanctuary states and cities.
Democrats: the party for court packing.
Democrats: the anti-second amendment party.
Democrats: the party of Robert Byrd & the KKK.
Democrats: the anti-free speech party.
Democrats: the party of erasing American history.
Democrats: the party of rioters & looters.
Democrats: the party of DEI based hiring, not merit based.
Democrats: the party of pro-criminals, anti-victims.
Democrats: the party of butt ugly women.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Taliban threw a parade in honor of Biden Harris' contribution to Afghanistan yesterday on the anniversary of the magnificent surrender:





Oh yes, of course it's at Bagram, where Tim Walz claims to have served, and have PTSD from.
SpreadsheetAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Stat Monitor Repairman said:


Uncovered 9-million votes!

30-days ago Kamala was polling as the least popular VP of all time, and nobody knew who Tim was outside of Minnesota.

We looking at the greatest political turnaround of all time.


This is the media providing cover for 9 million "found ballots" at 4AM
Stat Monitor Repairman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Stat Monitor Repairman said:



'America's wine mom'

Pulling up in her big suv. Stanley cup in the console with a little mixer. Wants America to pile in the back seat. Tell us everything gonna ok and we'll get bagel bites and a jello pudding pop when we get home.


America's wine mom rolls on ...
Stat Monitor Repairman
How long do you want to ignore this user?


We seeing a systematic campaign targeting individual demos. For the weekend news cycle it'll be the Boomers.

Just like with the covid vax they experts at getting the herd moving in one direction and riding the momentum.

The strategy of Kamala's people being executed about as good as we've ever seen.

Hardest part gonna be keeping her semi-sober for the next 81-days.
Stat Monitor Repairman
How long do you want to ignore this user?


From the creator of the Obama hope poster; introducing 'Forward'

Imagery that America will grow to know and love.
Stat Monitor Repairman
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Kamalanomenon

The Queen Brat

Are you ready for this?
SpreadsheetAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Pretty sure this is selectively edited, but I can almost hear her giddiness here as well...

aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

Every now and then, politicians allow the truth to seep into their carefully crafted talking points. That's exactly what happened when Nancy Pelosi went on the record to confirm that Kamala Harris was not the Democrats' original choice to be their presidential nominee in 2024 when Joe Biden was ousted in an orchestrated coup back in July.

This is what Pelosi told Ezra Klein of The New York Times, as it appears in the interview transcript:
Quote:

Yeah, well, I think here's the thing. The thought was that if this were to happen, but it happened fast, we ... none of us had any idea he would do it that Sunday. Well, I didn't have any idea. Most people didn't. So when he did that and endorsed [Kamala Harris], then the thought was everybody wanted an open process. Let's see the talent, let's see the bench of the Democrats and let them come. And see what they can attract. But when he endorsed her, then it was, "Are you with me or not?" And she moved quickly.

Quote:

This was a bombshell confession. On the one hand, we all know that Pelosi had been conspiring with Chuck Schumer and Barack Obama to get rid of Joe Biden on the ticket after recognizing the polling damage that his obvious senility and terrible performance as president had caused. On the other hand, she admits to being blindsided by the timing of Biden's withdrawal and also admits to have been blindsided by his simultaneous endorsement of Kamala Harris, suggesting that "everybody wanted an open process" to identify the party's candidate.

...everybody, that is, except Joe Biden. Biden's endorsement of Harris effectively bound the DNC's hands, as the exhilarating prospect of having an ethnically diverse female president quickly spread through the party ranks and social media on that Sunday afternoon. There was simply no time to consider the entirely practical idea to initiate an open and democratic process to identify the Democrats' best and most electable candidate.
LINK

Pelosi was outsmarted by Biden? Didn't have that one on my 2024 Bingo card.
SpreadsheetAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ooooohhhhh, I see:

Kamala Harris: "Return On Investment" Will Pay For Increased Child Tax Credit, First-Time Home-Buyer Benefit "Pays For Itself" | Video | RealClearPolitics

Quote:

REPOTRTER: You unveiled your economic policies last week.. Can you explain how you're going to pay for those, and can you give us a sense of what other policies you want to unveil?

KAMALA HARRIS: Sure, well I mean, you just look at it in terms of what we are talking about, for example, around children and the Child Tax Credit and extending the EITCV (Earned Income Tax Credit). That is at $6,000, for the first year of a child's life, the return on that investment, in terms of what that will do and what it will pay for, will be tremendous. We've seen it when we did it in the first year of our administration, reduced child poverty by over 50%.

So that's a lot of the work. And then what we're doing in terms of the tax credits, we know that there's a great return on investment. When we increase home ownership in America, what that means in terms of increasing the tax base, not to mention your property tax base, and what that does to fund schools. Again, return on investment.

I think it's a mistake for any person who talks about public policy to not critically evaluate how you measure the return on investment when you were strengthening neighborhoods, strengthening communities, and in particular the economy of those communities and investing in a broad-based economy, everybody benefits and it pays for itself in that way.

REPORTER: CBS News has a new poll showing that you're three points up nationally, what's your response to this? Do you still consider yourself the underdog here?

KAMALA HARRIS: I very much consider us the underdog. We have a lot of work to do to earn the vote of the American people, that's why we're on this bus tour today. And we're gonna be traveling this country, as we've been, and talking with folks, listening to folks, and hopefully earning their votes over the next 79 days.
Bryanisbest
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TulsAg said:

A vote for Donald Trump in the GOP primary is a vote for Kamala Harris for President.

The hard-core Trump supporters are not nearly enough to carry the general election. They were insufficient last election before all of the more recent Trump "issues" and will do no better this time around. And there is no way that Joe Biden physically and (especially) mentally makes it another 4 years.

The extreme left wing faction of the Democrat Party created the Trump presidency when they denigrated and vilified the "bitter clingers" and the other "common" people in the South and in flyover country, forcing them to rally around someone perceived as carrying their banner. The Democrats created their own worst nightmare. Now, the extreme right wing faction of the GOP seems bent on doing the very same thing - creating their own nightmare scenario by setting the stage for a Harris presidency. If Trump gets the nomination, Harris will end up at president.

It's like watching a train wreck in slow motion but being unable to do anything to stop it....



Say hello to Ron D for me. I'll be for him in 2028 even without an improved campaign. Trump '24
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Harris should stay quiet and just let propagandists explain how great she is:



What a farce.
SpreadsheetAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
SpreadsheetAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
nortex97 said:

Harris should stay quiet and just let propagandists explain how great she is:



What a farce.
SpreadsheetAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
SpreadsheetAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
SpreadsheetAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
She chickened out of the Fox debate in early September.

AgDad121619
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This should not be allowed and need commercials blasted on this. Presidential debates in our constitutional republic should be requirements for presidential candidates - and with no rigged favorable sessions. This infuriates me to no end.
TRADUCTOR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Kamalas is the joke for those who vote for her. Yes it is a costume party, vote for Kamalas and show up in costume.

We all gonna laugh at you when you show up in costume.
Opalka
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AgDad121619 said:

This should not be allowed and need commercials blasted on this. Presidential debates in our constitutional republic should be requirements for presidential candidates - and with no rigged favorable sessions. This infuriates me to no end.
I remember all of the debates that Trump did during the Primaries this past year.
AgDad121619
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Opalka said:

AgDad121619 said:

This should not be allowed and need commercials blasted on this. Presidential debates in our constitutional republic should be requirements for presidential candidates - and with no rigged favorable sessions. This infuriates me to no end.
I remember all of the debates that Trump did during the Primaries this past year.
great response - how many has your non democratic appointed nominee ever done? She made it through one debate in 2020 cycle and garnered less than 1% in her home state

And would love to see you defend her not debating Trump if her past four years record was as strong as advertised and defend her need to flip/flop on her positions.

The democrats are the party of hiding their candidates in the basement because their policies and performance can't be exposed in the daylight. I know you won't respond because you have no real response except the hit and run troll act.
P.U.T.U
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Opalka said:

AgDad121619 said:

This should not be allowed and need commercials blasted on this. Presidential debates in our constitutional republic should be requirements for presidential candidates - and with no rigged favorable sessions. This infuriates me to no end.
I remember all of the debates that Trump did during the Primaries this past year.
Having a debate against someone requires 2 people to attend and not hide in a basement.
techno-ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
P.U.T.U said:

Opalka said:

AgDad121619 said:

This should not be allowed and need commercials blasted on this. Presidential debates in our constitutional republic should be requirements for presidential candidates - and with no rigged favorable sessions. This infuriates me to no end.
I remember all of the debates that Trump did during the Primaries this past year.
Having a debate against someone requires 2 people to attend and not hide in a basement.

Hidin' Harris.
Trump will fix it.
Stat Monitor Repairman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Stat Monitor Repairman
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Karl Rove goes out on a limb by echoing what this thread saying 3-weeks ago. Get it together old man.
techno-ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Stat Monitor Repairman said:



Karl Rove goes out on a limb by echoing what this thread saying 3-weeks ago. Get it together old man.

Yeah when old school RINOs like Karl Rove and Peggy Noonan gush over Kamalala, it doesn't really surprise me much. They loved Obummer too.
Trump will fix it.
Stat Monitor Repairman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wild that in 2000 Rove was considered a genius-guru.

Been a wild two decades.
LMCane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AgDad121619 said:

This should not be allowed and need commercials blasted on this. Presidential debates in our constitutional republic should be requirements for presidential candidates - and with no rigged favorable sessions. This infuriates me to no end.

something so many of us stated here in F16 a year ago

Always Trumpers replied by stating: "someone ahead in the polls doesn't have to debate"

AgDad121619
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
LMCane said:

AgDad121619 said:

This should not be allowed and need commercials blasted on this. Presidential debates in our constitutional republic should be requirements for presidential candidates - and with no rigged favorable sessions. This infuriates me to no end.

something so many of us stated here in F16 a year ago

Always Trumpers replied by stating: "someone ahead in the polls doesn't have to debate"


unless I'm mistaken, those weren't the nominated presidential candidates this past summer. Trying to compare this past summer republican debates where he had a 40% isnt anywhere close to the same - I was talking about the two candidates that one of which will be president in Nov. And for the record , i would have like to seen Trump debate this past summer but that wasn't going to change him winning the nomination
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.