But surely they'll leave that one guy's Tikka's alone since he blindly supported them?
Right?
Right?
PanzerAggie06 said:
Joe said the quiet part out loud. This has never been, and never will be, just about semi automatic rifles. The left WILL NEVER STOP until they have all guns.
DrEvazanPhD said:BigRobSA said:
"shall not be infringed"
Also, if there is no rationale, why does his SS detail use them and not old six shooters?
Why not use double barrel shotguns they can fire in the air?
DannyDuberstein said:
There are 400 million firearms in the US. Even if you wanted to blatantly ignore the God given rights protected by the Constitution, basic logic would tell you that laws like this will only protect real criminals. They'll have access to whatever they are motivated to get while law-abiders become easy prey
YouBet said:DannyDuberstein said:
There are 400 million firearms in the US. Even if you wanted to blatantly ignore the God given rights protected by the Constitution, basic logic would tell you that laws like this will only protect real criminals. They'll have access to whatever they are motivated to get while law-abiders become easy prey
Should make it a goal to get another 200 million on top of that.
DannyDuberstein said:YouBet said:DannyDuberstein said:
There are 400 million firearms in the US. Even if you wanted to blatantly ignore the God given rights protected by the Constitution, basic logic would tell you that laws like this will only protect real criminals. They'll have access to whatever they are motivated to get while law-abiders become easy prey
Should make it a goal to get another 200 million on top of that.
I'm tryin, Ringo
DannyDuberstein said:
There are 400 million firearms in the US. Even if you wanted to blatantly ignore the God given rights protected by the Constitution, basic logic would tell you that laws like this will only protect real criminals. They'll have access to whatever they are motivated to get while law-abiders become easy prey
Are you doing that just to try to help gun companies make money?SunrayAg said:DannyDuberstein said:YouBet said:DannyDuberstein said:
There are 400 million firearms in the US. Even if you wanted to blatantly ignore the God given rights protected by the Constitution, basic logic would tell you that laws like this will only protect real criminals. They'll have access to whatever they are motivated to get while law-abiders become easy prey
Should make it a goal to get another 200 million on top of that.
I'm tryin, Ringo
In honor of FJB, I will strive to purchase another semi automatic firearm next week.
Darn, now I have to go gun shopping and figure out which one I want…
SunrayAg said:DannyDuberstein said:YouBet said:DannyDuberstein said:
There are 400 million firearms in the US. Even if you wanted to blatantly ignore the God given rights protected by the Constitution, basic logic would tell you that laws like this will only protect real criminals. They'll have access to whatever they are motivated to get while law-abiders become easy prey
Should make it a goal to get another 200 million on top of that.
I'm tryin, Ringo
In honor of FJB, I will strive to purchase another semi automatic firearm next week.
Darn, now I have to go gun shopping and figure out which one I want…
blacksox said:Funky Winkerbean said:
It's scary to think about how bad off we'd be without guns.
Like no school shootings? Or what are you talking about?
Señor Chang said:blacksox said:Funky Winkerbean said:
It's scary to think about how bad off we'd be without guns.
Like no school shootings? Or what are you talking about?
And there are no drug overdoses since drugs were banned.
blacksox said:Funky Winkerbean said:
It's scary to think about how bad off we'd be without guns.
Like no school shootings? Or what are you talking about?
Funky Winkerbean said:
It's scary to think about how bad off we'd be without guns.
I have many friends who are quite liberal and we have, on numerous occasions, discussed the ins and outs of gun control. My message to them is always the same. Conservatives are extremely skeptical, to the extreme, when libs claim they just want to limit access to semi automatic weapons as they fully understand that if conservatives compromise on semi automatic rifles on a Friday the Democratic politicians on Monday will state, "now lets discuss hand guns".Tom_Fox said:PanzerAggie06 said:
Joe said the quiet part out loud. This has never been, and never will be, just about semi automatic rifles. The left WILL NEVER STOP until they have all guns.
Hence why there should never be compromise in this issue and continue to push the pendulum back utilizing the conservative Supreme Court.
This is the way. Belt feds for everyone in time square for New Year's Eve!
Wouldn't 6 shooters still be semi auto?BigRobSA said:
"shall not be infringed"
Also, if there is no rationale, why does his SS detail use them and not old six shooters?
They'll be replaced with school beheadings.blacksox said:Funky Winkerbean said:
It's scary to think about how bad off we'd be without guns.
Like no school shootings? Or what are you talking about?
Ghost of Bisbee said:
What's the problem with banning semiautos
blacksox said:Funky Winkerbean said:
It's scary to think about how bad off we'd be without guns.
Like no school shootings? Or what are you talking about?
Nothing, if it is done as part of a constitutional amendment, also repealing/replacing the 2nd amendment.Ghost of Bisbee said:
What's the problem with banning semiautos
Funky Winkerbean said:Ghost of Bisbee said:
What's the problem with banning semiautos
It's unconstitutional.
They realize it. They just don't care because they know the media and the sheeple will blindly follow in lockstep. It's not about truth or proper definitions.CStewTAMU said:
Does this idiot not realize that the vast majority of all guns sold are semi auto? Pretty much all handguns are semi auto and the ones that aren't (revolvers) shoot just like a semi auto.
TxAgPreacher said:
I'll never turn in a gun. Ever.