should have used nancy's broker.

There is a similarity there-- much like the arms profiteering of the capital, the medical heads like him seem to have been doing pandemic profiteering.

Quote:

---

lucrative cash prizes awarded by non-profit organizations around the world

---

Please tell me more about these non-profits in other countries (safely excluded from U.S. Govt inquiry) and why they would give Fraudci huge amounts of money.

Dr puppy torturer made way more than 5 MM off hoax virus

Dude is legend

Quote:

---

The combined wealth of the 81-year-old retiring director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and his bioethicist wife, Christine Grady, soared from $7.5 million in 2019 to $12.6 million at the end of 2021

---

Stocks and real estate, booming from April 2020 to end of 2021.

My Name Is Judge said:

---

Dr puppy torturer made way more than 5 MM off hoax virus

Dude is legend

---

Good point. I would not be surprised if there are a few bank accounts in the Caymans that Fraudci has that are not included in his estimated Net Worth.

That's all?!?! Idiot…

the sooner he dies the better off the country will be

The government gets richer while the citizens get poorer.

PCC_80 said:

---

Quote:

---

lucrative cash prizes awarded by non-profit organizations around the world

---

Please tell me more about these non-profits in other countries (safely excluded from U.S. Govt inquiry) and why they would give Fraudci huge amounts of money.

---

As a federal employee, how could he be paid for speaking about his job or collect such money from foreign sources dealing with his job?

The Fauc clearly knows how to navigate bear markets.

Rapier108 said:

---

Should be facing a trial for crimes against humanity.

---

I am wondering why no prominent trial lawyers have not filed a class-action law suit against Fauci, NIH, Peter Daszak and EcoHealth Alliance, Wuhan Institute of Virology, and many others for their involvement in creating the Covid virus.

It is a multi-billion dollar damages case, and there already exists a preponderance of evidence of their liability and coverup in the pandemic.

When "public service" becomes a grifting scheme, it's no longer service to the public.

This man should be tossed into an active volcano. And be made to wear 3 masks on the way down.

That's what's known he's worth a lot more

NASAg03 said:

---

Dr. Fauci and wife's wealth 'skyrocketed' by $5 million during pandemic: analysis https://t.co/SFjeB4KSFx pic.twitter.com/3IKW652icK

— New York Post (@nypost) September 29, 2022

My 401K is down 20% but this guy is living large.

Quote:

---

"Fauci's soaring net worth was based on career-end salary spiking, lucrative cash prizes awarded by non-profit organizations around the world and an ever-larger investment portfolio," Andrzejewski said.

---

---

Politicians, and Fauci is at that level and more in terms of government salary, have always made extra money from each of those things mentioned. The problem is that so long as it's "my guy" no one bats an eye. Now if you actually want to get rid of the problem, knowing "your guy" is going to get affected too, then the best thing we can do is have term-limits for politicians and age maximums for government employees. Do both of those and you significantly reduce things like this happening.

Explain the "age maximum" concept. Your average fed tops out at their pay grade and there ain't no more increases…….sometimes for years until they retire. For folks at the SES grades, the real reward comes with unused vacation that has no cap like the folks in the trenches

B-1 83 said:

---

Explain the "age maximum" concept. Your average fed tops out at their pay grade and there ain't no more increases…….sometimes for years until they retire. For folks at the SES grades, the real reward comes with unused vacation that has no cap like the folks in the trenches

---

Yes, they top out, but they stay in a position for decades, which if you're an average Joe, then all you're usually doing is biding time until you can retire. That's the reality for the vast majority of any employee. Those aren't the ones I'm talking about, because they don't get the benefits like politicians and the Fauci-level employees in the government that OP mentioned.

Now, if you're Okay with a 70 or 80-year-old politician who has been in their seats for many terms, and their worth has increased more than their base salary would allow, then leave things as is, just expect to see Fauci's, Pelosi's, McConnell's, Romney's, etc. getting richer and richer with every year that goes by. And even these politicians who had money before office, no one can be so naive as to think they don't find ways to fill their personal coffers further with things they do in office.

As for what age would be good to max out, they are federal employees, so tie it to something federal like Social Security. You're eligible at 62 and reach the maximum at 70. It's a start.

LOYAL AG said:

---

I'll be shocked if he doesn't own a significant amount of stock in Pfizer.

---

Question is how did he get the stock. Was he granted stock options from the company or relatives nefariously providing the stock. This and his family members finances need to be thoroughly, honestly and transparently investigated. I know it won't happen, I can not believe how he can look in the mirror knowing he help fund the research in Wuhan that caused the deaths of millions worldwide.

LOYAL AG said:

---

I'll be shocked if he doesn't own a significant amount of stock in Pfizer.

---

Thought that was already known to be true?

richardag said:

---

LOYAL AG said:

---

I'll be shocked if he doesn't own a significant amount of stock in Pfizer.

---

Question is how did he get the stock. Was he granted stock options from the company or relatives nefariously providing the stock. This and his family members finances need to be thoroughly, honestly and transparently investigated. I know it won't happen, I can not believe how he can look in the mirror knowing he help fund the research in Wuhan that caused the deaths of millions worldwide.

---

Not real sure it matters. I mean he told us right after Trump was inaugurated that this was going to happen. Of course he's going to use that knowledge to make sure he's well positioned to benefit from the mess he created. It's how the game is played.

No Spin Ag said:

---

B-1 83 said:

---

Explain the "age maximum" concept. Your average fed tops out at their pay grade and there ain't no more increases…….sometimes for years until they retire. For folks at the SES grades, the real reward comes with unused vacation that has no cap like the folks in the trenches

---

Yes, they top out, but they stay in a position for decades, which if you're an average Joe, then all you're usually doing is biding time until you can retire. That's the reality for the vast majority of any employee. Those aren't the ones I'm talking about, because they don't get the benefits like politicians and the Fauci-level employees in the government that OP mentioned.

Now, if you're Okay with a 70 or 80-year-old politician who has been in their seats for many terms, and their worth has increased more than their base salary would allow, then leave things as is, just expect to see Fauci's, Pelosi's, McConnell's, Romney's, etc. getting richer and richer with every year that goes by. And even these politicians who had money before office, no one can be so naive as to think they don't find ways to fill their personal coffers further with things they do in office.

As for what age would be good to max out, they are federal employees, so tie it to something federal like Social Security. You're eligible at 62 and reach the maximum at 70. It's a start.

---

Federal employees hired after about 1986 do pay in to SS. The old Civil Service system died then, with those under it about gone. At 40 years, they max out.

Will U.S. tax payers be on the hook for his lawyer bills when he is called to testify before congress in '23?

Maybe a good idea to keep a watch to see if he and/or the mrs. have opened / will open foreign bank accounts.

LOYAL AG said:

---

I'll be shocked if he doesn't own a significant amount of stock in Pfizer.

---

Wouldn't help him that much. Pfizer stock is up 19% in the last 2 1/2 years since the start of COVID.

BoydCrowder13 said:

---

LOYAL AG said:

---

I'll be shocked if he doesn't own a significant amount of stock in Pfizer.

---

Wouldn't help him that much. Pfizer stock is up 19% in the last 2 1/2 years since the start of COVID.

---

That's 3x the 6% the S&P is up since the first down day leading into Covid insanity.

LOYAL AG said:

---

BoydCrowder13 said:

---

LOYAL AG said:

---

I'll be shocked if he doesn't own a significant amount of stock in Pfizer.

---

Wouldn't help him that much. Pfizer stock is up 19% in the last 2 1/2 years since the start of COVID.

---

That's 3x the 6% the S&P is up since the first down day leading into Covid insanity.

---

Yea that's relatively pretty good. Energy, real estate and health care have done pretty well over the past couple years.

Just saying your aren't getting rich off a 19% return over 30 months.

BoydCrowder13 said:

---

LOYAL AG said:

---

BoydCrowder13 said:

---

LOYAL AG said:

---

I'll be shocked if he doesn't own a significant amount of stock in Pfizer.

---

Wouldn't help him that much. Pfizer stock is up 19% in the last 2 1/2 years since the start of COVID.

---

That's 3x the 6% the S&P is up since the first down day leading into Covid insanity.

---

Yea that's relatively pretty good. Energy, real estate and health care have done pretty well over the past couple years.

Just saying your aren't getting rich off a 19% return over 30 months.

---

Sure but that's hindsight. He created this mess and positioned himself to profit from it. That it didn't go as planned financially doesn't change the circumstances here. This all assumed he bought Pfizer prior to this thing happening which YouBet tells us he believes has been reported.