I haven't paid attention to any of this but did he say hundreds of police were injured by the grandmas taking selfies?

oh no said:

---

Cops executed an unarmed trespasser with a bullet in the head. She was a US military veteran too. Therefore, it was a deadly insurrection and the insurrectionists are still in prison.

---

I mean their lies that capitol police were killed by insurrectionists

jja79 said:

---

I haven't paid attention to any of this but did he say hundreds of police were injured by the grandmas taking selfies?

---

Yep. After saying an officer was bludgeoned to death, Bishop asks him about it. He scolds Bishop and asks if he denies that at least one police officer died and then contends that over 130 police officers were injured at least one died. I have no idea what the injuries were, but it would be in much better faith if they stop lying about cops being killed, because there were ZERO, and focus on the injuries instead.

Have they released all the videos? What little I've seen seemed like the tourists were annoying but not threatening. I would consider the tens of thousands of insurrectionists encouraged by Pelosi, Harris and Waters to have been violent based on the hours of footage of them turning over police cars, setting fire to public and private property, destroying homes and businesses and entire communities while they were at it. That was something of a "How To Insurrect" video.

Lies will become truth and truth will become lies. People will want their ears tickled and won't tolerate truth. It's in the Good book and it's happening. Pray for discernment.

The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.

oh no said:

---

there's cold hard video proof of people like John Earle Sullivan (Antifa/ BLM) instigating and inciting violence and Ray Epps (FBI?) encouraging people to leave the mall and go into the Capitol and no one talks about them, the "bipartisan" special committee doesn't want to talk to them, nothing --- they just have to keep the talking point about a "deadly" "insurrection" alive, despite zero deaths by the trespassers and zero chance the unarmed mob led by a shirtless vegan dude with a viking hat was going to overthrow the government or kill VP Pence or any other lie they want keep in the news 18 months later.

---

Thought you might find this exchange interesting.

Just when I thought he couldn’t top the last one, Raskin goes right at Massie and his dumb ass Ray Epps conspiracy. pic.twitter.com/RC2vD1arBb

— Ron Filipkowski 🇺🇦 (@RonFilipkowski) September 21, 2022

"conspirary theory" is a Democrat Media contrivance. And Epps testimony is hardly as relevant as what we can see with our own eyes on videos of Jan 5 (BEFORE the events) and on Jan 6. And also the selective removal of him from FBI attention later.

And him going on about "The Trump Way" -- yeah, that's really objective.

I thought Bishops response was gutless.

He should have point blank stated Robinson was lying and called him a liar.

titan said:

---

"conspirary theory" is a Democrat Media contrivance. And Epps testimony is hardly as relevant as what we can see with our own eyes on videos of Jan 5 (BEFORE the events) and on Jan 6. And also the selective removal of him from FBI attention later.

And him going on about "The Trump Way" -- yeah, that's really objective.

---

Weird to me that Raskin is defending Epps, calls Jan 6th a "protest" not a riot, etc.

aggiehawg said:

---

titan said:

---

"conspirary theory" is a Democrat Media contrivance. And Epps testimony is hardly as relevant as what we can see with our own eyes on videos of Jan 5 (BEFORE the events) and on Jan 6. And also the selective removal of him from FBI attention later.

And him going on about "The Trump Way" -- yeah, that's really objective.

---

Weird to me that Raskin is defending Epps, calls Jan 6th a "protest" not a riot, etc.

---

Ray Epps is the only person at the Capitol that day that the left defends. Occam's Razor, the thing that makes the most sense, is that he was a plant/agitator. Same as Sullivan.

BadMoonRisin said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

titan said:

---

"conspirary theory" is a Democrat Media contrivance. And Epps testimony is hardly as relevant as what we can see with our own eyes on videos of Jan 5 (BEFORE the events) and on Jan 6. And also the selective removal of him from FBI attention later.

And him going on about "The Trump Way" -- yeah, that's really objective.

---

Weird to me that Raskin is defending Epps, calls Jan 6th a "protest" not a riot, etc.

---

Ray Epps is the only person at the Capitol that day that the left defends. Occam's Razor, the thing that makes the most sense, is that he was a plant/agitator. Same as Sullivan.

---

Agree. And remember, Sullivan was only outed overtly because he sold his video wanting to get the story about Ashli Babbit's shooting out. He is disatraught in that video and saying it to all as he makes his way from the shooting scene at that doorway. He gets interviewed by another right after - -talking about what he saw. Much later, comes his arrest. But its his reporting on the shooting that drew attention to him.

titan said:

---

BadMoonRisin said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

titan said:

---

"conspirary theory" is a Democrat Media contrivance. And Epps testimony is hardly as relevant as what we can see with our own eyes on videos of Jan 5 (BEFORE the events) and on Jan 6. And also the selective removal of him from FBI attention later.

And him going on about "The Trump Way" -- yeah, that's really objective.

---

Weird to me that Raskin is defending Epps, calls Jan 6th a "protest" not a riot, etc.

---

Ray Epps is the only person at the Capitol that day that the left defends. Occam's Razor, the thing that makes the most sense, is that he was a plant/agitator. Same as Sullivan.

---

Agree. And remember, Sullivan was only outed overtly because he sold his video wanting to get the story about Ashli Babbit's shooting out. He is disatraught in that video and saying it to all as he makes his way from the shooting scene at that doorway. He gets interviewed by another right after - -talking about what he saw. Much later, comes his arrest. But its his reporting on the shooting that drew attention to him.

---

Tucker puts it way more eloquently than I could, but he came to the same conclusion.

"Proud Boys" were charged with crimes that it was proven that Ray Epps also committed on January 6th, 2021. He was even called out as being a fed the night before for basically being a poorly programmed NPC.

Ray Epps was caught on tape doing it. Yet the full force of the federal government is squarely placed on the mythical "proud boys" and not on some old ass dude that was called out as a Fed the day before any of that happening, committing the same offense as the "Proud Boys" that got the gulag treatment.

He was literally called out for being this guy:



And the democrats defend him as someone "in the wrong place at the wrong time, just trying to move on with his life", while they have double digit political prisoners hidden away in DC jails, left to rot.

Tucker sure did conclude that, and he had some clips hadn't seen. This is one of those cases where `Occam's Razor' argument actually goes against establishment defenders. It makes no sense the kid gloves the Media and then even the FBI are treating Epps with given his very overt provocations, greater than many that day, more on line with Sullivan's statements in his videos when he met the CNN woman Jade.

The crowd itself identified him as a `Fed!Fed!" the day before. His provocations were that obvious, and you can see the idea of going into the building being presented by someone who really does appear to be a plant.

The inquiry's one sidedness here is just too obvious. Its similar to the ignoring of the pipe bombs---only Catherine Herridge has stayed on that trail but the Pelosi-Cheney team ignores it.

Anyone have any idea what this bit about Epps and cartels refers to? That came out of the blue. What do they have to with Jan 6 on either side?

Question to any: At 1:15 mark in the Tucker video, do any recognize exactly where in Washington, in relation to the Ellipse and Monument, that intersection is? The man from Revolver pointed out that Epps is at the Peace Monument by the time of the first breach (which itself is a bit suspicious because Trump's speech was still going on then).

Bumping for the Saturday crowd any familiar with the story.

What is "official " explanation for what Epps is doing and why so defended by the establishment/media in contrast to the others?

They really need to rework the Speech and Debate Clause for how its is now being abused to protect lying and storytelling, primarily by the blue commies but also at times by the good guys.

One should not be immune from making knowingly false and inaccurate statements and be immune from any criticism and action by muh speech and debate clause.

Schiff should not be allowed to serve in congress. Period, the end.

And that's just one of the usual suspects. Since Jan 6th, theres a whole gaggle of folks lying during formal congressional proceedings. That was NOT the point of the speech and debate clause.