Dan Crenshaw and Liz Cheney and bonus: Nancy Pelosi

6,179 Views | 79 Replies | Last: 2 yr ago by M-K-TAG
mjschiller
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
How did Crenshaw every get elected?
Marvin J. Schiller
Pookers
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
mjschiller said:

How did Crenshaw every get elected?


Republican voters are massive ******s.
BuddysBud
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
mjschiller said:

How did Crenshaw every get elected?


Crenshaw ran as a conservative outsider who was not part of the DC swamp and outside of Texas crony political influence.

when he was elected the MSM portrayed him as the anti-AOC.

Once in Washington, unfortunately, he seemed to have slipped on swamp slime and fell deep into its murky depths.
96AgGrad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I think he views himself as a pragmatist. Principles don't seem as important to him as to his voters.
The Kraken
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ah yes, the weekly bellyaching about Dan Crenshaw thread.

What exactly about that year old tweet is untrue?
plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose
BuddysBud
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
New World Ag said:

Ah yes, the weekly bellyaching about Dan Crenshaw thread.

What exactly about that year old tweet is untrue?


I would ask what about that tweet is true?
Liz Chaney is an establishment, big government elitist who is willing to lie to gain political points with leadership of her opposition party.

Crenshaw's support of Chaney is a huge red flag to Americans who believe that the Constitution is written to protect citizens from an overreaching government, not an outline for government tyranny.
Marcus Brutus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
He's bought and paid for by Paul Singer.
The Kraken
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BuddysBud said:

New World Ag said:

Ah yes, the weekly bellyaching about Dan Crenshaw thread.

What exactly about that year old tweet is untrue?


I would ask what about that tweet is true?
Liz Chaney is an establishment, big government elitist who is willing to lie to gain political points with leadership of her opposition party.

Crenshaw's support of Chaney is a huge red flag to Americans who believe that the Constitution is written to protect citizens from an overreaching government, not an outline for government tyranny.
Her voting record is extremely conservative, not indicate of "big government".
plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose
mustang1234
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Term Limits! Thats the only way to drain the swamp!!!
My Name Is Judge
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I was a big Crenshaw fan

I was wrong

He's a useless pos
BuddysBud
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
New World Ag said:

BuddysBud said:

New World Ag said:

Ah yes, the weekly bellyaching about Dan Crenshaw thread.

What exactly about that year old tweet is untrue?


I would ask what about that tweet is true?
Liz Chaney is an establishment, big government elitist who is willing to lie to gain political points with leadership of her opposition party.

Crenshaw's support of Chaney is a huge red flag to Americans who believe that the Constitution is written to protect citizens from an overreaching government, not an outline for government tyranny.
Her voting record is extremely conservative, not indicate of "big government".


She fell off the deep end with TDS.
Trump brought out the true colors of fake conservatives like the Bushes and Cheneys who consider anyone who goes against the establishment to be enemies of the state.

The country was founded to protect citizens from government tyranny. Her willful participation in the Pelosi Jan 6 witch hunt is unforgivable. Establishment politicians, like the Bushes and Cheneys, believe that they have a royal right to govern. The Constitution specifically prohibits royalty in this country. True conservatives would work toward reducing the size and power of government. When push comes to shove her clan thrives on big government.
gig em 02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
hedge said:

Crenshaw, pelosi, trump, biden… All the same coin
Everything Trump did was to promote the middle class. The only president to ever actually put the middle class first.
pagerman @ work
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
gig em 02 said:

hedge said:

Crenshaw, pelosi, trump, biden… All the same coin
Everything Trump did was to promote the middle class. The only president to ever actually put the middle class first.
“Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy. It's inherent virtue is the equal sharing of miseries." - Winston Churchill
The Kraken
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So basically, any conservative who calls out Trump on his BS is a RINO marxist neocon big government globalist. Noted.
plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose
wessimo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
New World Ag said:

So basically, any conservative who calls out Trump on his BS is a RINO marxist neocon big government globalist. Noted.


Yep, I member when Dan was F16 royalty. Oh how the turn tables.
lil99chris
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
mjschiller said:

How did Crenshaw every get elected?


Take away the eye patch and he doesn't mKe it out of the Republican primary.

Going from Ted Poe to Dan Crenshaw is why people are frustrated.
wessimo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I guess Kathaleen Wall is the rep that this board wants & deserves.
BuddysBud
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
New World Ag said:

So basically, any conservative who calls out Trump on his BS is a RINO marxist neocon big government globalist. Noted.


It is one thing calling out Trump for things he legitimately did wrong. However usually the conspiracy theories that he called out ended up being true.

The Jan 6 inquisition is bogus from the start. Pelosi was in charge of security and she declined Trump's offer of additional help. Pelosi heading up the Jan 6 committee is a conflict of interest to start. If Cheneys was interested in the truth rather than protecting the establishment, then she would at a minimum point out that conflict.

Cheney's willful participation on that inquisition without questioning its political motives puts her in a very bad position as a conservative.

She is scum. I don't know why anyone would defend her, especially Crenshaw who was elected to be anti-establishment.
lil99chris
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I am confident Wall would not have been the Republican nominee. She was already negatively viewed by voters. Kevin Roberts?
Funky Winkerbean
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TXAGFAN said:

agdaddy04 said:

Politicians should be limited to mutual funds for investing.
Good luck getting bipartisan support on that
Why is it humorous?
It is so easy to be wrong—and to persist in being wrong—when the costs of being wrong are paid by others.
Thomas Sowell
Funky Winkerbean
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
wessimo said:

I guess Kathaleen Wall is the rep that this board wants & deserves.
No, we need better options. Crenshaw was the better choice but he has not lived up to expectations. Time to move on, it's how our system works.
It is so easy to be wrong—and to persist in being wrong—when the costs of being wrong are paid by others.
Thomas Sowell
BuddysBud
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
wessimo said:

New World Ag said:

So basically, any conservative who calls out Trump on his BS is a RINO marxist neocon big government globalist. Noted.


Yep, I member when Dan was F16 royalty. Oh how the turn tables.


Yes, Crenshaw has turned the tables, and those who can pay attention can see it.

Resident CM's would turn on AOC if she suddenly started talking about a free open society rather than communism and racial hatred.
BuddysBud
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Funky Winkerbean said:

wessimo said:

I guess Kathaleen Wall is the rep that this board wants & deserves.
No, we need better options. Crenshaw was the better choice but he has not lived up to expectations. Time to move on, it's how our system works.


Wall isn't running against Crenshaw in 2022.
BMX Bandit
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Neither is anyone with a pulse
BuddysBud
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
pagerman @ work said:

gig em 02 said:

hedge said:

Crenshaw, pelosi, trump, biden… All the same coin
Everything Trump did was to promote the middle class. The only president to ever actually put the middle class first.



The middle class of all demographics did better economically under Trump than any other recent president.

You can believe your propaganda or you can look st facts.
J. Walter Weatherman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
New World Ag said:

So basically, any conservative who calls out Trump on his BS is a RINO marxist neocon big government globalist. Noted.


Yep - should honestly be stickied at the top of the board. Doesn't matter if you vote conservative 100% of the time, say one negative thing about Dear Leader and you're suddenly just as bad as aoc.
TXAGFAN
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Funky Winkerbean said:

TXAGFAN said:

agdaddy04 said:

Politicians should be limited to mutual funds for investing.
Good luck getting bipartisan support on that
Why is it humorous?
Its an incredibly naive point of view.
BuddysBud
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
J. Walter Weatherman said:

New World Ag said:

So basically, any conservative who calls out Trump on his BS is a RINO marxist neocon big government globalist. Noted.


Yep - should honestly be stickied at the top of the board. Doesn't matter if you vote conservative 100% of the time, say one negative thing about Dear Leader and you're suddenly just as bad as aoc.


Enjoying the Joe Biden economy yet?
Any idiot with a brain could predict that Biden would be a disaster. You just had to look at his platform rather than believe the moderate, stable Joe lies from the DNC Pravda.

81 million brainless votes got us even worse than Carter.

But, hey, no more mean tweets.
BAP Enthusiast
How long do you want to ignore this user?
5StarShield said:

If you were highly concentrated in energy stocks, you beat the S&P500 this year.

As someone who is involved in the markets, it's really frustrating to see uneducated shots at individuals that make easy headlines but don't easily hold up under scrutiny. We usually see these from the left types (Bernie, Warren etc.). Just because they beat the S&P500 doesn't mean they did something wrong. If you can tell me what he owned, when he bought them and what legislation was passed or potential knowledge was known ahead of time then we can label him a cheat.

Regarding Cheney, that's a different subject.


The levels of returns DC politicians have are close to Bitcoin levels of increases in wealth. As in numbers of 1000% or 10,000% over the last decade. These are insider trading levels.
BuddysBud
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BMX Bandit said:

Neither is anyone with a pulse


In the interview with Jameson Ellis that I heard, he seemed like a true conservative who is pro freedom and against government overstep.

But it's hard to run against the deep pockets of the World Economic Forum members.

Chances are I will have to vote for Crenshaw in November.
BuddysBud
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BAP Enthusiast said:

5StarShield said:

If you were highly concentrated in energy stocks, you beat the S&P500 this year.

As someone who is involved in the markets, it's really frustrating to see uneducated shots at individuals that make easy headlines but don't easily hold up under scrutiny. We usually see these from the left types (Bernie, Warren etc.). Just because they beat the S&P500 doesn't mean they did something wrong. If you can tell me what he owned, when he bought them and what legislation was passed or potential knowledge was known ahead of time then we can label him a cheat.

Regarding Cheney, that's a different subject.


The levels of returns DC politicians have are close to Bitcoin levels of increases in wealth. As in numbers of 1000% or 10,000% over the last decade. These are insider trading levels.


They do insider trading legally because they exempt themselves from the laws.
Marcus Brutus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
J. Walter Weatherman said:

New World Ag said:

So basically, any conservative who calls out Trump on his BS is a RINO marxist neocon big government globalist. Noted.


Yep - should honestly be stickied at the top of the board. Doesn't matter if you vote conservative 100% of the time, say one negative thing about Dear Leader and you're suddenly just as bad as aoc.


Why sticky a strawman?
The Kraken
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
You do know it's possible to call out politicians on both sides of the spectrum? Just because you criticize one side doesn't automatically make you a supporter of the other.
plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose
Valtrex11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
wessimo said:

I guess Kathaleen Wall is the rep that this board wants & deserves.


Thought you swore this board off lol ?
BAP Enthusiast
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BuddysBud said:

BAP Enthusiast said:

5StarShield said:

If you were highly concentrated in energy stocks, you beat the S&P500 this year.

As someone who is involved in the markets, it's really frustrating to see uneducated shots at individuals that make easy headlines but don't easily hold up under scrutiny. We usually see these from the left types (Bernie, Warren etc.). Just because they beat the S&P500 doesn't mean they did something wrong. If you can tell me what he owned, when he bought them and what legislation was passed or potential knowledge was known ahead of time then we can label him a cheat.

Regarding Cheney, that's a different subject.


The levels of returns DC politicians have are close to Bitcoin levels of increases in wealth. As in numbers of 1000% or 10,000% over the last decade. These are insider trading levels.


They do insider trading legally because they exempt themselves from the laws.


Yep, and it's one of the absolute worst parts of our government.
Page 2 of 3
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.