Thanks to all.
aggiehawg said:
Senator Fann's letter has scared MCBOS back into emergency meetings.
Notice they just have to take some potshots at CyberNinjas and Senator Fann. Considering everything, her letter was exceedingly polite, in my view. And instead of hauling theirs butts into court on a show cause hearing, she's inviting them to a public hearing next week. (Odds anyone of them show up next week ? I'd say zero.)
It is also a sign of peeing down your leg fear. They took Zuckbucks and pocketed a portion of them. I posted the response from Detroit to a Zuckbuck questionnaire earlier today.Quote:
It's pretty pathetic when a meeting notice has to be used to posture. After reading today's materials I just can't believe there aren't massive payoffs to these "election officials". If law enforcement wasn't so busy busting white supremists they could probably get all kinds of confessions.
Exactly right you have to consciously wipe a file to make it unrecoverable, accidently hitting delete doesn't overwrite the file.VegasAg86 said:I don't know about an electronic trace, but you know they were used because everything is gone. IMO, if everything is gone after a deletion, it's not an "oopsie".aggiehawg said:
Appreciate the insight. Question? Does the program used to delete files such as Bleach Bit leave an elctronic trace it was used? Do other "secure delete programs" leave signatures? TIA.
rab79 said:Exactly right you have to consciously wipe a file to make it unrecoverable, accidently hitting delete doesn't overwrite the file.VegasAg86 said:I don't know about an electronic trace, but you know they were used because everything is gone. IMO, if everything is gone after a deletion, it's not an "oopsie".aggiehawg said:
Appreciate the insight. Question? Does the program used to delete files such as Bleach Bit leave an elctronic trace it was used? Do other "secure delete programs" leave signatures? TIA.
aggiehawg said:It is also a sign of peeing down your leg fear. They took Zuckbucks and pocketed a portion of them. I posted the response from Detroit to a Zuckbuck questionnaire earlier today.Quote:
It's pretty pathetic when a meeting notice has to be used to posture. After reading today's materials I just can't believe there aren't massive payoffs to these "election officials". If law enforcement wasn't so busy busting white supremists they could probably get all kinds of confessions.
Basically said that used zero of the 7.4 million "grant" (actually criminal solicitation) to nto provide one single dollar towards PPE nor Covid protection for the workers. But they sure did use the money to hire the peopl they wanted to achieve a "positive result."
And they want the grant to be doubled, as well. So they can bribe more election workers to skew the results.
I don't know about on Windows file systems, but with some file systems, particularly with journaling file systems, even overwriting with random patterns may not work because they don't necessarily write in place.Tailgate88 said:Microsoft is dumb but they do at least put the file information into the Master File Table in NTFS, not the registry. The concept is valid, though - you can delete the file from the MFT but the 1's and 0's of the actual "deleted" file are still out on the disk, waiting for a data recovery program to find them.eric76 said:Knowing Microsoft, I wouldn't put it past them to try to merge them together. It would be highly improbable and rather messy, but not impossible.aezmvp said:I probably screwed it up. Not IT.eric76 said:Microsoft now puts the directory information into the registry?aezmvp said:Some times when you "delete" something it takes the registry away meaning the computer doesn't know where to look for that information. In that case the data may still be there because it hasn't been overwritten, though it is available to be so because its not registered as actively used.aggiehawg said:Completely deleted? How do data recovery programs work?Decay said:It's a data recovery program. Looks like they're showing exactly what's been deleted.Charpie said:
Can someone other than me actually translate what the top tweet shows? The X over those file links are just decorations. If they were deleted and you can see the directories, you should be able to recover them
So the computer didn't change all the 1s and 0s where the data was, it just thinks it's blank. That means that if you have a history of the registry file you can go and find it. It could be place in LOTS of places non-sequentially all over your hard drive.
At least that is my understanding.
How strange!
Edit: added a note above to reflect I'm dumb.
Unless, that is, you use a secure delete program, such as the famous "Bleach Bit" employed by Hillary when she was wiping her laptop - you know, like with a cloth.
There are plenty of secure delete programs that will delete a file, then find the area on the disk where the file used to reside, and overwrite it with random patterns 1 or 3 or 5 or 100 times. If I was in a position to delete the primary voter database from a voting machine to hide the fact that I cheated my ass off and also to try and keep my ass out of jail, you can bet I'd be utilizing one of those to delete it with.
(Eric, I know you understand this, just posting for the benefit of some of our less techie friends here.)
With modern file systems, it might work better just to fill the hard drive with a random file so that you overwrite all the free space on the drive.aggiehawg said:Appreciate the insight. Question? Does the program used to delete files such as Bleach Bit leave an elctronic trace it was used? Do other "secure delete programs" leave signatures? TIA.Tailgate88 said:Microsoft is dumb but they do at least put the file information into the Master File Table in NTFS, not the registry. The concept is valid, though - you can delete the file from the MFT but the 1's and 0's of the actual "deleted" file are still out on the disk, waiting for a data recovery program to find them.eric76 said:Knowing Microsoft, I wouldn't put it past them to try to merge them together. It would be highly improbable and rather messy, but not impossible.aezmvp said:I probably screwed it up. Not IT.eric76 said:Microsoft now puts the directory information into the registry?aezmvp said:Some times when you "delete" something it takes the registry away meaning the computer doesn't know where to look for that information. In that case the data may still be there because it hasn't been overwritten, though it is available to be so because its not registered as actively used.aggiehawg said:Completely deleted? How do data recovery programs work?Decay said:It's a data recovery program. Looks like they're showing exactly what's been deleted.Charpie said:
Can someone other than me actually translate what the top tweet shows? The X over those file links are just decorations. If they were deleted and you can see the directories, you should be able to recover them
So the computer didn't change all the 1s and 0s where the data was, it just thinks it's blank. That means that if you have a history of the registry file you can go and find it. It could be place in LOTS of places non-sequentially all over your hard drive.
At least that is my understanding.
How strange!
Edit: added a note above to reflect I'm dumb.
Unless, that is, you use a secure delete program, such as the famous "Bleach Bit" employed by Hillary when she was wiping her laptop - you know, like with a cloth.
There are plenty of secure delete programs that will delete a file, then find the area on the disk where the file used to reside, and overwrite it with random patterns 1 or 3 or 5 or 100 times. If I was in a position to delete the primary voter database from a voting machine to hide the fact that I cheated my ass off and also to try and keep my ass out of jail, you can bet I'd be utilizing one of those to delete it with.
(Eric, I know you understand this, just posting for the benefit of some of our less techie friends here.)
I don't think you quite got the answer you were looking for on this question. I'm not an expert, but while there may not be a log, the lack of intact data or the nature of the data overwriting the block could in itself be evidence that a secure deletion had occurred. Thereby not an accident and not conventional. To me it would be direct evidence of destroying evidence.Quote:
Appreciate the insight. Question? Does the program used to delete files such as Bleach Bit leave an elctronic trace it was used? Do other "secure delete programs" leave signatures? TIA.