Ellis Wyatt said:

---

eric76 said:

---

If Trump had recognized that he lost the election instead of continuing to try to stir up controversy to get the election that he clearly lost awarded to him, then it is very unlikely that he would have been impeached again.

---

Oh yeah? What's the excuse for Obama spying on Trump?

---

a campaign manager providing internal polling data to a foreign intelligence that was actively intervening in an election and having inside info on public drops of hack info on their opponent that the foreign intelligence had hacked. That's what the R led Senate Intel Committee said Trump's campaign did in 2016 in their 2020 report.

MouthBQ98 said:

---

It's on, apparently.

---

What makes you think there will ever be another divided government?

West Texas Lawyer said:

---

Win the house in 2022, investigate the sh*t out of Joe and impeach his ass. That's how the game is played.

I'm astonished at the left's ability to hate a single person so much.

---

Like he is going to be President come the first week of Feb in 2023

This was the case when Clinton got impeached for lying about a blowjob...

(he probably should have been removed from office for the act, but the investigation was a way bigger witch hunt than anything Trump claims)

Precedence was set years ago

Can't win the House as long as the democrats go unpunished for cheating.

West Texas Lawyer said:

---

Win the house in 2022, investigate the sh*t out of Joe and impeach his ass. That's how the game is played.

I'm astonished at the left's ability to hate a single person so much.

---

Why investigate? The quid pro quo with Ukraine and Burisma to protect Hunter is sufficient grounds.
Don't stop there, go after Heels Up as well. Doesn't have to be much. Peddling false information in the Kavanaugh hearings. Impeach Nancy as well. Who the flying flip cares if she retires. Trump will be out of office but they still want to go down this rabbit hole, so impeach everybody!!!

txagbear said:

---

Precedence was set years ago

---

Just weak excuses for your party's embarrassing behavior.

I hope your savior Joe gets the same respect.

will25u said:

---

---

That'll show 'em Marge!

eric76 said:

---

If Trump had recognized that he lost the election instead of continuing to try to stir up controversy to get the election that he clearly lost awarded to him, then it is very unlikely that he would have been impeached again.

I don't see this as setting any kind of a precedent for normal elections involving rational Presidents.

---

So you think the appeasement route is the correct choice?

ETA
I can't decide if you should change your screen name to Chamberlain or Goebbels.

eric76 said:

---

If Trump had recognized that he lost the election instead of continuing to try to stir up controversy to get the election that he clearly lost awarded to him, then it is very unlikely that he would have been impeached again.

I don't see this as setting any kind of a precedent for normal elections involving rational Presidents.

---

Impeached twice for not breaking the law once is a terrible precedent. Impeachment is officially a 100% political tool now, not a legal one. Anyone who isn't a completely biased moron can see that.

geoag58 said:

---

eric76 said:

---

If Trump had recognized that he lost the election instead of continuing to try to stir up controversy to get the election that he clearly lost awarded to him, then it is very unlikely that he would have been impeached again.

I don't see this as setting any kind of a precedent for normal elections involving rational Presidents.

---

So you think the appeasement route is the correct choice?

---

Who said anything about appeasement? Well, you did, I guess.

Trump lost the election but like a little crybaby he's been having tantrums about it ever since.

DannyDuberstein said:

---

eric76 said:

---

If Trump had recognized that he lost the election instead of continuing to try to stir up controversy to get the election that he clearly lost awarded to him, then it is very unlikely that he would have been impeached again.

I don't see this as setting any kind of a precedent for normal elections involving rational Presidents.

---

Impeached twice for not breaking the law once is a terrible precedent. Impeachment is officially a 100% political tool now, not a legal one. Anyone who isn't a completely biased moron can see that.

---

Bingo. The process means nothing now.

It's just something they'll continue using against Republicans that win elections.

It's a tantrum now, nothing more.

DannyDuberstein said:

---

eric76 said:

---

If Trump had recognized that he lost the election instead of continuing to try to stir up controversy to get the election that he clearly lost awarded to him, then it is very unlikely that he would have been impeached again.

I don't see this as setting any kind of a precedent for normal elections involving rational Presidents.

---

Impeached twice for not breaking the law once is a terrible precedent. Impeachment is officially a 100% political tool now, not a legal one. Anyone who isn't a completely biased moron can see that.

---

Only a completely biased moron could fail to see that if Trump had admitted the truth about losing the election and quit acting like a crybaby and whining about it to his cult to get what he wants, there would not have been a second impeachment.

Thanks for proving my point eric. You never fail to deliver

eric76 said:

---

DannyDuberstein said:

---

eric76 said:

---

If Trump had recognized that he lost the election instead of continuing to try to stir up controversy to get the election that he clearly lost awarded to him, then it is very unlikely that he would have been impeached again.

I don't see this as setting any kind of a precedent for normal elections involving rational Presidents.

---

Impeached twice for not breaking the law once is a terrible precedent. Impeachment is officially a 100% political tool now, not a legal one. Anyone who isn't a completely biased moron can see that.

---

Only a completely biased moron could fail to see that if Trump had admitted the truth about losing the election and quit acting like a crybaby and whining about it to his cult to get what he wants, there would not have been a second impeachment.

---

Only a biased leftist pretending to be a Concerned Moderate won't admit Trump has done nothing wrong and both impeachment's are 100% politically motivated liberal temper tantrums

Maroon Dawn said:

---

eric76 said:

---

DannyDuberstein said:

---

eric76 said:

---

If Trump had recognized that he lost the election instead of continuing to try to stir up controversy to get the election that he clearly lost awarded to him, then it is very unlikely that he would have been impeached again.

I don't see this as setting any kind of a precedent for normal elections involving rational Presidents.

---

Impeached twice for not breaking the law once is a terrible precedent. Impeachment is officially a 100% political tool now, not a legal one. Anyone who isn't a completely biased moron can see that.

---

Only a completely biased moron could fail to see that if Trump had admitted the truth about losing the election and quit acting like a crybaby and whining about it to his cult to get what he wants, there would not have been a second impeachment.

---

Only a biased leftist pretending to be a Concerned Moderate won't admit Trump has done nothing wrong and both impeachment's are 100% politically motivated liberal temper tantrums

---

Clearly not true. I'm a Classical Liberal which is very different from a leftist.

West Texas Lawyer said:

---

Win the house in 2022, investigate the sh*t out of Joe and impeach his ass. That's how the game is played.

I'm astonished at the left's ability to hate a single person so much.

---

Joe should be in prison.

eric76 said:

---

Maroon Dawn said:

---

eric76 said:

---

DannyDuberstein said:

---

eric76 said:

---

If Trump had recognized that he lost the election instead of continuing to try to stir up controversy to get the election that he clearly lost awarded to him, then it is very unlikely that he would have been impeached again.

I don't see this as setting any kind of a precedent for normal elections involving rational Presidents.

---

Impeached twice for not breaking the law once is a terrible precedent. Impeachment is officially a 100% political tool now, not a legal one. Anyone who isn't a completely biased moron can see that.

---

Only a completely biased moron could fail to see that if Trump had admitted the truth about losing the election and quit acting like a crybaby and whining about it to his cult to get what he wants, there would not have been a second impeachment.

---

Only a biased leftist pretending to be a Concerned Moderate won't admit Trump has done nothing wrong and both impeachment's are 100% politically motivated liberal temper tantrums

---

Clearly true. I'm a Liberal which is the exact same as a leftist.

---

FIFY

Incite a riot?
Impeachment

Collude with Russia to get elected?
Impeachment

Get a blowjob from an intern?
Impeachment

eric76 said:

---

If Trump had recognized that he lost the election instead of continuing to try to stir up controversy to get the election that he clearly lost awarded to him, then it is very unlikely that he would have been impeached again.

I don't see this as setting any kind of a precedent for normal elections involving rational Presidents.

---

Only the liberals will say it doesn't set precedent.

Just like Harry Reid changing filibuster rules - thinking it doesn't set precedent

Husky Boy Jr. said:

---

Another alternative for future presidents is not encouraging a terrorist attack against the USA.

---

Obama armed terrorists in Mexico and throughout the Middle East who ended up killing Americans with those weapons. You voted for him twice as a reward.

eric76 said:

---

DannyDuberstein said:

---

eric76 said:

---

If Trump had recognized that he lost the election instead of continuing to try to stir up controversy to get the election that he clearly lost awarded to him, then it is very unlikely that he would have been impeached again.

I don't see this as setting any kind of a precedent for normal elections involving rational Presidents.

---

Impeached twice for not breaking the law once is a terrible precedent. Impeachment is officially a 100% political tool now, not a legal one. Anyone who isn't a completely biased moron can see that.

---

Only a completely biased moron could fail to see that if Trump had admitted the truth about losing the election and quit acting like a crybaby and whining about it to his cult to get what he wants, there would not have been a second impeachment.

---

Easy there Tiger. Getting a little too riled up, me thinks.

I be you think that Jeffery Epstein killed himself, too, just because no one was able to get a murder charge to stick.

Your definition of the Truth must be "whatever the media keeps repeating dozens of times."

Calling no fraud "the truth" and people that voted for Trump (all 75 million of them) a cult just makes you sound like a whiney little 12 year old girl.

Trump had every right to pursue every avenue he did (except with that stupid thing with Pence), and something Democrats have done all along.

Finally, "acting like a crybaby and whining about stuff" is not even an impeachable offence. If it was, Nancy would have been boot out long, long ago. In fact, she could probably be impeached just for bringing these last stupid, pointless articles of impeachment to a vote.

I think that the republicans should impeach Harris three times once she takes office and the GOP has the house, just to set the record.

For fun, they should do three days in a row.

Fify

Ogre09 said:

---

Get blamed by opposition for Inciting a riot?
Impeachment

Get falsely accused of some vague quid pro quo corruption on a diplomatic call to Ukraine?
Impeachment

Lie to a grand jury about Getting a blowjob from an intern? (Not to mention an abuse of power over a subordinate that would get any corporate manger fired on the spot)
Impeachment

---

I'm not saying it's a good precedent, but if you look at the history of impeachments, we are on a downward trajectory over how frivolous and nakedly political they are.

I look forward to Obama's impeachment in 2022, as well as President Harris.

It will be quite fun.