Trump filed suit in GA state court
7,268 Views |
98 Replies |
Last: 3 yr ago by HTownAg98
So this one...this is the Kraken, or ???
This is an actual lawsuit. Proofread & all. No Powell.
So the kraken?
RAWRRR!!!! ...
.
...?
.
...?
Do you mind a quick summary on what he is alleging?
Time to drop the hammer.BMX Bandit said:
This is an actual lawsuit. Proofread & all. No Powell.
Rittenhouse said:
Do you mind a quick summary on what he is alleging?
Some people did something. [/Omar]
Probably that he got more votes than Biden
So Trump's lawyers read TexAgs?
Two weeks.
Swing away, Mr. President
Should I read it? Who filed it? Sekulow?BMX Bandit said:
This is an actual lawsuit. Proofread & all. No Powell.
1. That this Court, pursuant to O. C. G. A. 21-2-523, expeditiously assign a Superior Court or Senior Judge to preside over this matter;
2. That this Court issue a declaratory judgment that systemic, material violations of the Election Code during the Contested Election for President of the United States occurred that has rendered the Contested Election null and void as a matter of law;
3. That this Court issue a declaratory judgment that systemic, material violations of the Election Code during the Contested Election violated the voters' due process rights under the Georgia Constitution have rendered the Contested Election null and void as a matter of law;
4. That this Court issue a declaratory judgment that systemic, material violations of the Election Code violated the voters' equal protection rights under the Constitution of the State of Georgia that have rendered the Contested Election null and void as a matter of law;
5. That the Court issue an injunction requiring all Respondents to decertify the results of the Contested Election;
6. That the Court order a new election to be conducted in the presidential race, in the entirety of the State of Georgia at the earliest date, to be conducted in accordance with the Election Code;
7. Alternatively, that the Court issue an injunction prohibiting the Secretary of State from appointing the slate of presidential electors due to the systemic irregularities in the Contested Election sufficient to cast doubt on its outcome;
Get out the popcorn, it's getting interesting.
2. That this Court issue a declaratory judgment that systemic, material violations of the Election Code during the Contested Election for President of the United States occurred that has rendered the Contested Election null and void as a matter of law;
3. That this Court issue a declaratory judgment that systemic, material violations of the Election Code during the Contested Election violated the voters' due process rights under the Georgia Constitution have rendered the Contested Election null and void as a matter of law;
4. That this Court issue a declaratory judgment that systemic, material violations of the Election Code violated the voters' equal protection rights under the Constitution of the State of Georgia that have rendered the Contested Election null and void as a matter of law;
5. That the Court issue an injunction requiring all Respondents to decertify the results of the Contested Election;
6. That the Court order a new election to be conducted in the presidential race, in the entirety of the State of Georgia at the earliest date, to be conducted in accordance with the Election Code;
7. Alternatively, that the Court issue an injunction prohibiting the Secretary of State from appointing the slate of presidential electors due to the systemic irregularities in the Contested Election sufficient to cast doubt on its outcome;
Get out the popcorn, it's getting interesting.
Eat some popcorn if you like but this is happening way too late. Safe harbor provision kicks in in four days.Quote:
Get out the popcorn, it's getting interesting.
8. That the Court order expedited discovery and hearing, since time is of the essence, given the legal requirements that the presidential electors from the State of Georgia are to meet on December 14, 2020, and that the electoral votes from the State of Georgia are to be delivered to and counted by the United States Congress on January 6, 2021;
9. That this Court issue a declaratory judgment that the Consent Decree violates the Constitution of the State of Georgia and the laws of the State of Georgia;
10. Alternatively, that the Consent Decree be stayed during the pendency of this matter;
11. That the Court order Respondents to make available 10,000 absentee ballot applications and ballot envelopes from Respondents, as per Exhibit 16, and access to the voter registration database sufficient to complete a full audit, including but not limited to a comparison of the signatures affixed to absentee ballot applications and envelopes to those on file with the Respondents;
12. That the Court order the Secretary of State and other Respondents to release to Petitioners for inspection all records regarding the Contested Election pursuant to O.C.G.A. 21-2- 586;
13. That the Court order all Respondents to immediately identify and remove felons with uncompleted sentences, cross-county voters, out-of-state voters, deceased voters, and other ineligible persons from Respondents' voter rolls within the next 30 days;
14. That the Court declare that all rules adopted by the Respondents Secretary of State or the State Election Board in contravention of the Georgia Election Code be invalidated, specifically regarding the authentication and processing of absentee ballots, to wit State Election Board Rule 183-1-14-0.9-.15; 15. That the Court order such other relief as it finds just and proper.
More from the suit. They ain't messing around now.
9. That this Court issue a declaratory judgment that the Consent Decree violates the Constitution of the State of Georgia and the laws of the State of Georgia;
10. Alternatively, that the Consent Decree be stayed during the pendency of this matter;
11. That the Court order Respondents to make available 10,000 absentee ballot applications and ballot envelopes from Respondents, as per Exhibit 16, and access to the voter registration database sufficient to complete a full audit, including but not limited to a comparison of the signatures affixed to absentee ballot applications and envelopes to those on file with the Respondents;
12. That the Court order the Secretary of State and other Respondents to release to Petitioners for inspection all records regarding the Contested Election pursuant to O.C.G.A. 21-2- 586;
13. That the Court order all Respondents to immediately identify and remove felons with uncompleted sentences, cross-county voters, out-of-state voters, deceased voters, and other ineligible persons from Respondents' voter rolls within the next 30 days;
14. That the Court declare that all rules adopted by the Respondents Secretary of State or the State Election Board in contravention of the Georgia Election Code be invalidated, specifically regarding the authentication and processing of absentee ballots, to wit State Election Board Rule 183-1-14-0.9-.15; 15. That the Court order such other relief as it finds just and proper.
More from the suit. They ain't messing around now.
aggiehawg said:Should I read it? Who filed it? Sekulow?BMX Bandit said:
This is an actual lawsuit. Proofread & all. No Powell.
Ray S. Smith III, from Smith & Liss LLC. They appear to be based in Atlanta.
If you don't mind, please explain what you mean by "Safe Harbor" to a non attorney.aggiehawg said:Eat some popcorn if you like but this is happening way too late. Safe harbor provision kicks in in four days.Quote:
Get out the popcorn, it's getting interesting.
Quote:
There are many dates to be aware of following the projected win of President-elect Joe Biden and before Inauguration Day on Jan. 20, 2021 one of them being the "safe harbor" deadline on Dec. 8, 2020.
https://www.fox6now.com/news/safe-harbor-deadline-heres-why-dec-8-matters-in-the-2020-electionQuote:
Federal law (3 U.S. Code 5) frees a state from further challenge if it settles legal disputes and certifies its results at least six days before the Electoral College meeting, which occurs this year on Dec. 14.
"Whatever final decision that state reached by (Dec. 8) that's conclusive and final and binding and nobody has any right to second guess it," explained Adav Noti of Campaign Legal Center, a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization that focuses on voting rights, campaign finance, anti-gerrymandering work and government ethics.
Noti is the center's senior director for trial litigation and chief of staff. He previously spent more than 10 years with the Federal Election Commission in a variety of capacities.
"It's not a deadline in the sense that states don't have to do that states have until Dec. 14 to figure out who their members of the Electoral College are," Noti added. "But if they do it at least six days in advance, they have this extra protection under federal law."
Essentially if a state has certified, no one can challenge it after that date
Quote:
107. Someone deceased for 10 years should not have received three absentee ballots.
108. Someone deceased for 10 years should not have received any absentee ballot.
109. Someone deceased for 10 years should not have had any absentee ballot counted
Quick skim, didn't see anything on Dominion. Did I miss it?
1-45 as of 5:12 pm.
What's one more loss for ol' Drumpf?
What's one more loss for ol' Drumpf?
C/O 2013 - Company E2
In court. Can't challenge in court. There is still 3 U.S.C. 15.BMX Bandit said:
Essentially if a state has certified, no one can challenge it after that date
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/3/15#
Probably not going to happen but it might.
Your godless brethren most likely pulled it off. I'd give the chance of anything happening 1 in 1,000. Congrats on all the cheating. Also congrats on your senile racist who sniffs little children and raises crackhead pedophiles.JCRebel13 said:
1-45 as of 5:12 pm.
What's one more loss for ol' Drumpf?
hawg, as for strategy, lets say PA, GA, NV, AZ all have pending lawsuits on the 15th.
Choosing Electors with an open case disputing the results constitutes a "contested election," no?
Choosing Electors with an open case disputing the results constitutes a "contested election," no?
It's funny, not in a humourous way. But, leading up to the election, Biden bumper stickers/signage were pretty much absent here in the NW, compared to 2016 (HRC) and previous elections.
Now? They're popping up ALL OVER. Every day, I see more.
Now? They're popping up ALL OVER. Every day, I see more.
Not under the safe harbor provision. The cases can proceed but they will have no effect on the certification.The Debt said:
hawg, as for strategy, lets say PA, GA, NV, AZ all have pending lawsuits on the 15th.
Choosing Electors with an open case disputing the results constitutes a "contested election," no?
Is this where you bring up your "the VP has the authority to reject electors from a contested election" theory?
Still waiting on the legal basis for it.
Still waiting on the legal basis for it.
The TC Jester said:Your godless brethren most likely pulled it off. I'd give the chance of anything happening 1 in 1,000. Congrats on all the cheating. Also congrats on your senile racist who sniffs little children and raises crackhead pedophiles.JCRebel13 said:
1-45 as of 5:12 pm.
What's one more loss for ol' Drumpf?
Yawn. If you don't like it here, then just leave.
C/O 2013 - Company E2
Didn't expect issues about Dominion. Too much factual evidence would be required. Make this as much as a simple matter of law, less fact, as possible.BMX Bandit said:
Quick skim, didn't see anything on Dominion. Did I miss it?
As I was skimming it, read more like a motion for summary judgment as well a declaratory judgment.
Nah, I love this country and would rather fight the limp wristed liberals than leave. I only hate roughly 1/3 of the country (white liberals).JCRebel13 said:The TC Jester said:Your godless brethren most likely pulled it off. I'd give the chance of anything happening 1 in 1,000. Congrats on all the cheating. Also congrats on your senile racist who sniffs little children and raises crackhead pedophiles.JCRebel13 said:
1-45 as of 5:12 pm.
What's one more loss for ol' Drumpf?
Yawn. If you don't like it here, then just leave.
aggiehawg said:Didn't expect issues about Dominion. Too much factual evidence would be required. Make this as much as a simple matter of law, less fact, as possible.BMX Bandit said:
Quick skim, didn't see anything on Dominion. Did I miss it?
As I was skimming it, read more like a motion for summary judgment as well a declaratory judgment.
Guess it's no longer about "facts not feelings".
C/O 2013 - Company E2
What does "safe harbor" protect as being certified? The election or the electors?aggiehawg said:Not under the safe harbor provision. The cases can proceed but they will have no effect on the certification.The Debt said:
hawg, as for strategy, lets say PA, GA, NV, AZ all have pending lawsuits on the 15th.
Choosing Electors with an open case disputing the results constitutes a "contested election," no?
Its not my theory, its this legal analysis of a hypothetical contested election.BMX Bandit said:
Is this where you bring up your "the VP has the authority to reject electors from a contested election" theory?
Still waiting on the legal basis for it.
Featured Stories
See All
2025 Prosper offensive lineman Connor Carty commits to Texas A&M
by Jason Howell
37:35
8h ago
4.2k
The Loochador Podcast: Maroon & White Game storylines abound
by Billy Liucci
6:33
8h ago
2.1k
In-Home Visit: Carty provides more Metroplex muscle for Maroon Goons
by TexAgs Recruiting
7:40
8h ago
18k
2025 OL Connor Carty calls committing to A&M a 'dream come true'
by Jason Howell
0:00
13h ago
4.7k
Struggle and Strifer
2025 Prosper offensive lineman Connor Carty commits to Texas A&M
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
80
rocketman1806
BSB: Thursday's A&M-Alabama game postponed, Friday DH
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
67