The Kraken has been released. See Powell document lawsuit Georgia

55,406 Views | 469 Replies | Last: 5 mo ago by superunknown
EnderWiggin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Diyala Nick said:

Troutslime said:

Diyala Nick said:

Dominionvotingsystems.com was registered about 5 months ago. This is dumb, and a lame attempt to connect dots that don't exist.
What is dumb about it?


If I am looking to overthrow a US election, I probably don't register the domain a few months before the election and also have the party doing the registering do so from china. I would think the conspirators would be a little more sophisticated that this.

This is like the receipt for a murder weapon being written in crayon on manilla paper.


What does it matter if it is registered in China? The fact it is connected to the internet at all is alarming.
Ramdiesel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AgBMF42 said:

hbtheduce said:

AgBMF42 said:

So was it someone in the US loading blank ballots and someone in China printing the selections? Or someone in Detroit going through the software changing them?





Those options aren't mutually exclusive.


You can't overturn an election over hypotheticals

All they have to really prove was the election didnt even have a basic level of security, cyber security, or fairness. You have numerous cities in states that did not allow Republican poll watchers to monitor the ballot counts for substantial amounts of time. You have inexplicable spikes in the voting counts that favor Biden by a large percentage. You have a computer network that is easily hacked. You have an election system that allows administrators to move votes around at whim...You have eye witness testimony of several state election laws broken.

I think they have enough to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the election was not free, fair, or secure, and that several state election laws were broken. The Supreme Court has a hard decision to make...The US Constitution has pretty strong language about the sanctity and importance of every individual's vote..

ScottishFire
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AgBMF42 said:

Sidney is just trolling at this point, she will be lucky if she is not disbarred.

Lol,
You obviously haven't read a lick of her documents.

Troll, troll, troll your boat, fake Ag.
Houston Lee
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
EnderWiggin said:

Diyala Nick said:

Troutslime said:

Diyala Nick said:

Dominionvotingsystems.com was registered about 5 months ago. This is dumb, and a lame attempt to connect dots that don't exist.
What is dumb about it?


If I am looking to overthrow a US election, I probably don't register the domain a few months before the election and also have the party doing the registering do so from china. I would think the conspirators would be a little more sophisticated that this.

This is like the receipt for a murder weapon being written in crayon on manilla paper.


What does it matter if it is registered in China? The fact it is connected to the internet at all is alarming.
Bingo. The vulnerability of the system is at the heart of why the election results are in question. The results can't be trusted because the system IS NOT SECURE. I don't know why people are having such a hard time grasping this.

Then, when you add in all the mathematical improbabilities and voting count irregularities, it shows an over all picture that something is wrong.
Funky Winkerbean
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
How do you foresee the EO from 2018 coming into play?
Houston Lee
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Troutslime said:

How do you foresee the EO from 2018 coming into play?
The EO states that certain agencies are tasked with reporting back within 45 days after Election Day on the security of the election.

So, we are looking at mid-December. I think there will be a reckoning that we have never seen before...

Quote:

Section 1. (a) Not later than 45 days after the conclusion of a United States election, the Director of National Intelligence, in consultation with the heads of any other appropriate executive departments and agencies (agencies), shall conduct an assessment of any information indicating that a foreign government, or any person acting as an agent of or on behalf of a foreign government, has acted with the intent or purpose of interfering in that election. The assessment shall identify, to the maximum extent ascertainable, the nature of any foreign interference and any methods employed to execute it, the persons involved, and the foreign government or governments that authorized, directed, sponsored, or supported it. The Director of National Intelligence shall deliver this assessment and appropriate supporting information to the President, the Secretary of State, the Secretary of the Treasury, the Secretary of Defense, the Attorney General, and the Secretary of Homeland Security.
(b) Within 45 days of receiving the assessment and information described in section 1(a) of this order, the Attorney General and the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the heads of any other appropriate agencies and, as appropriate, State and local officials, shall deliver to the President, the Secretary of State, the Secretary of the Treasury, and the Secretary of Defense a report evaluating, with respect to the United States election that is the subject of the assessment described in section 1(a):
(i) the extent to which any foreign interference that targeted election infrastructure materially affected the security or integrity of that infrastructure, the tabulation of votes, or the timely transmission of election results; and
(ii) if any foreign interference involved activities targeting the infrastructure of, or pertaining to, a political organization, campaign, or candidate, the extent to which such activities materially affected the security or integrity of that infrastructure, including by unauthorized access to, disclosure or threatened disclosure of, or alteration or falsification of, information or data.
The report shall identify any material issues of fact with respect to these matters that the Attorney General and the Secretary of Homeland Security are unable to evaluate or reach agreement on at the time the report is submitted. The report shall also include updates and recommendations, when appropriate, regarding remedial actions to be taken by the United States Government, other than the sanctions described in sections 2 and 3 of this order.
Philip J Fry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Or we'll see just how corrupt the left wing part of the alphabet has become.
UTExan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Troutslime said:

How do you foresee the EO from 2018 coming into play?
I wondered if anybody was going to pick up on that. And how SCOTUS might view that EO.
It is better to light a flamethrower than to curse the darkness- Sir Terence Pratchett
“ III stooges si viveret et nos omnes ad quos etiam probabile est mittent custard pies”
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

I think they have enough to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the election was not free, fair, or secure, and that several state election laws were broken. The Supreme Court has a hard decision to make...The US Constitution has pretty strong language about the sanctity and importance of every individual's vote..
First, civil court the standard is preponderance of the evidence, not beyond a reasonable doubt.

Second the issue of spoliation, that is destruction of evidence, changes the burden as under the law the destroyed materials are presumed to be adverse to the interests of the parties destroying them.

There have been some reports that websites of Sec of States have been taken down or otherwise altered. That could be huge.
Funky Winkerbean
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Didn't it state that foreign involvement rather equipment or server location is against the law? I know the EO has been broken,but will that meanin regards to the "results"?
Cancelled
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
What a clown show. "Decleration"
BigJim49 AustinNowDallas
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Re: Spelling - Legal Secretary relative says the computer would flag the error

but it is up to the secretary to make the correction.

Does ANYONE doubt that the race to make the filing caused this to be overlooked?

Relative says that she would not have been fired but she would have been BEHEADED !

Red Fishing Ag93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
December is lining up to be something else. Hold on to your hats / glocks.
Houston Lee
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Troutslime said:

Didn't it state that foreign involvement rather equipment or server location is against the law? I know the EO has been broken,but will that meanin regards to the "results"?
Here is the EO

https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/executive-order-imposing-certain-sanctions-event-foreign-interference-united-states-election/
Pumpkinhead
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
superunknown said:

releese the crackiccokn


LOL on this post. Well done.
hbtheduce
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AgBMF42 said:

hbtheduce said:

AgBMF42 said:

So was it someone in the US loading blank ballots and someone in China printing the selections? Or someone in Detroit going through the software changing them?





Those options aren't mutually exclusive.


You can't overturn an election over hypotheticals


Strawman me all you want Barnes. You made a dumb argument that only one route of fraud could be used.
whatthehey78
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Diyala Nick said:

Red Fishing Ag93 said:

Diyala Nick said:

Dominionvotingsystems.com was registered about 5 months ago. This is dumb, and a lame attempt to connect dots that don't exist.
Not relevant.


Clue me in.
Well you could start with Biden (easily the biggest joke of a presidential candidate in US history) receiving more votes than either Hillary ('16) or Obongo ('12). That would be the first clue. Only idiots/fools actually think that is within the realm of possibilities. Second, vote counts were halted (?????) while Trump led and magically (?????) trailed when counting resumed. Third, let's address the existence of "kickbacks/bribes" accepted by election officials. Then we can begin with the hundreds of sworn affidavits, testifying to corruption and election irregularities. I'll stop there even though other evidence exists.

I know it would be a brand new experience...but try the TRUTH and REALITY for a change.
Diyala Nick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
whatthehey78 said:

Diyala Nick said:

Red Fishing Ag93 said:

Diyala Nick said:

Dominionvotingsystems.com was registered about 5 months ago. This is dumb, and a lame attempt to connect dots that don't exist.
Not relevant.


Clue me in.
Well you could start with Biden (easily the biggest joke of a presidential candidate in US history) receiving more votes than either Hillary ('16) or Obongo ('12). That would be the first clue. Only idiots/fools actually think that is within the realm of possibilities. Second, vote counts were halted (?????) while Trump led and magically (?????) trailed when counting resumed. Third, let's address the existence of "kickbacks/bribes" accepted by election officials. Then we can begin with the hundreds of sworn affidavits, testifying to corruption and election irregularities. I'll stop there even though other evidence exists.

I know it would be a brand new experience...but try the TRUTH and REALITY for a change.


Kickbacks. Bribes. The Trilateral Commission. China. The Free Mason's. George Soros. Lizard People.

Got it.
dreyOO
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TurkeyBaconLeg said:

oats04Ag said:

Exhibit from the Michigan filing:


https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.mied.350905/gov.uscourts.mied.350905.1.15.pdf

And here is your Dominion "Smoking Gun"



Holy crap. I wanna hear the explanation behind this. Really completely inexcusable. Frankly, anyone in IT knows this is complete bull*****
Funky Winkerbean
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Why do you even bother posting on this thread? Your instant rebuttal is just to infer lunacy or ignorance. Try posting the information you are watching to form your opinions. You remind me of a teenager.
whatthehey78
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Diyala Nick said:

whatthehey78 said:

Diyala Nick said:

Red Fishing Ag93 said:

Diyala Nick said:

Dominionvotingsystems.com was registered about 5 months ago. This is dumb, and a lame attempt to connect dots that don't exist.
Not relevant.


Clue me in.
Well you could start with Biden (easily the biggest joke of a presidential candidate in US history) receiving more votes than either Hillary ('16) or Obongo ('12). That would be the first clue. Only idiots/fools actually think that is within the realm of possibilities. Second, vote counts were halted (?????) while Trump led and magically (?????) trailed when counting resumed. Third, let's address the existence of "kickbacks/bribes" accepted by election officials. Then we can begin with the hundreds of sworn affidavits, testifying to corruption and election irregularities. I'll stop there even though other evidence exists.

I know it would be a brand new experience...but try the TRUTH and REALITY for a change.


Kickbacks. Bribes. The Trilateral Commission. China. The Free Mason's. George Soros. Lizard People.

Got it.
Sooo mature....NOT. Was going to embellish, but waitwhat's reply tops what I was going to add.
ttu_85
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HTownAg98 said:

Troutslime said:

HTownAg98 said:

fooz said:

oats04Ag said:

Exhibit from the Michigan filing:


https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.mied.350905/gov.uscourts.mied.350905.1.15.pdf

oats04Ag said:

https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.mied.350905/gov.uscourts.mied.350905.1.19.pdf

Oh snap!

I'd like to know how the other side is expected to depose this person if they don't know who it is. If the person's identity is that important to hide, then there are appropriate ways of handling that. This is not it.
They will be called via a subpoena.

How do you serve someone with a subpoena if you don't know who they are?
Serve Dominions upper management with all the source code. Hell subpoena everything they are using in their stack.
hbc07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Im Gipper said:

In the biggest election law case in the history of the United States, no, history of western civilization, the law firm tasked with saving the Republic from the deep state & Hugo Chavez's ghost are not election law specialists, but divorce lawyers.

Maybe this is part of the national divorce plan.
It's not the most insane thing. They just need local counsel to get it filed so they can pro hac vice into the case.
Funky Winkerbean
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Why hasn't the FBI already done that?
SW AG80
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Lots of allegations, but the affidavit referred to in the petition is not attached. Or at least I did not find it any where. Still, the proof is in the pudding. We are getting close to "put up or shut up" time.
Change Detection
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Biden didn't win the popular vote....oooh that's gotta hur
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
SW AG80 said:

Lots of allegations, but the affidavit referred to in the petition is not attached. Or at least I did not find it any where. Still, the proof is in the pudding. We are getting close to "put up or shut up" time.
Some of the Exhibits are under a protective order. The court has them but they are not publicly available right now.
MROD92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Troutslime said:

Why hasn't the FBI already done that?


FBI?? Either you're a great comedian or a glutton for punishment
Jmiller
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SW AG80 said:

Lots of allegations, but the affidavit referred to in the petition is not attached. Or at least I did not find it any where. Still, the proof is in the pudding. We are getting close to "put up or shut up" time.


We are way past that time. Alas these frivolous accusations will be with us for some time just like how the other conspiracy theories have stuck around with us where so many bad actors are on the cusp of being indicted and the kraken being released to expose the improbable wide reaching plot. Makes great fantasy.
2004FIGHTINTXAG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Y'all stop feeding the massive troll. Just ignore him.
Red Fishing Ag93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Jmiller said:

SW AG80 said:

Lots of allegations, but the affidavit referred to in the petition is not attached. Or at least I did not find it any where. Still, the proof is in the pudding. We are getting close to "put up or shut up" time.


We are way past that time. Alas these frivolous accusations will be with us for some time just like how the other conspiracy theories have stuck around with us where so many bad actors are on the cusp of being indicted and the kraken being released to expose the improbable wide reaching plot. Makes great fantasy.
No.
ttu_85
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Troutslime said:

Why hasn't the FBI already done that?
Why didn't Trumps lawyers demand it from the get go. Nothing about any of this makes much sense. cluster F* anyway its sliced
Funky Winkerbean
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ttu_85 said:

Troutslime said:

Why hasn't the FBI already done that?
Why didn't Trumps lawyers demand it from the get go. Nothing about any of this makes much sense. cluster F* anyway its sliced


They very well might be very involved and Trump is keeping them muzzled.
whatthehey78
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Troutslime said:

Why hasn't the FBI already done that?
They're still taking bids.
Maury Ballstein
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Because you're being lied to and the FBI doesn't investigate unattribured hearsay from Q nutters.

That's the tell this is just another Giuliani/Powell and probably Bannon con.

Edit 1:35
Quote:

Pretty sure that's been disproven...SEE - FISA Court proceedings, Mueller Report, Steele Dossier, Flynn 302's,...should I go on?


Trump campaign advisors and senior staff were intercepted communicating with Russian agents before the "dossier". That's different than Powell "hearing things".

Barr would be all over this if there were anything to it, he must know it's a joke - like the rest of us.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.