This conspiracy theory reaches further than any conspiracy theory before.guitarmann92 said:
I think the judges on all of these cases are part of the deep state too. Maybe it has taken over the judiciary. Only way to explain the Supreme Court going against Trump, even after Trump appointed a third of them.
Agsrback12 said:
Nekcark is Kracken backwards. Coincidence?
guitarmann92 said:
I think the judges on all of these cases are part of the deep state too. Maybe it has taken over the judiciary. Only way to explain the Supreme Court going against Trump, even after Trump appointed a third of them.
redsquirrelAG said:
Have you folks realized that term was created by our corrupt spy agency to alienate open minded truth seekers? Wake up idiots.
redsquirrelAG said:
God has a special place for the mockers who are too weak to take on this evil.
Why do people keep saying this? Obama received 3.5 million votes in Texas in 2008. This year Biden received 5.3 million. Are you saying there are 2 million fraudulent votes in Texas?Quote:
Yes the guy that couldn't fill a picnic table with supporters got more votes than even the great Obama did in 2008.
More or less by the law? That should not be an option.Quote:
Do you want to understand why the Supreme Court went the way they did? Because they are there to follow the law. There is nothing in the law that would permit them to make the decisions based on loyalty to any one including the President.
Sure, there are times when their political leanings may influence the way they lean on some issues, but even then they are still going more or less by the law.
Have you realized that this too is actually a conspiracy theory? The term predates the formation of the CIA by about 75 yearsredsquirrelAG said:
Have you folks realized that term was created by our corrupt spy agency to alienate open minded truth seekers? Wake up idiots.
I didn't phrase that well.aggiehawg said:More or less by the law? That should not be an option.Quote:
Do you want to understand why the Supreme Court went the way they did? Because they are there to follow the law. There is nothing in the law that would permit them to make the decisions based on loyalty to any one including the President.
Sure, there are times when their political leanings may influence the way they lean on some issues, but even then they are still going more or less by the law.
The Roberts Court has largely been phoning in on their jobs. By trying to not to appear "political" they have altered the meaning of the Constitution, most likely forever and have ensured their own demise as a separate branch of government. They will be legislated out of relevance.
That's it.BMX Bandit said:
Which part of her lawsuit does that? Be specific.
Between some things that went on in Houston, Dallas, The Valley and San Antonio I do have a few suspicions.New World Ag said:Why do people keep saying this? Obama received 3.5 million votes in Texas in 2008. This year Biden received 5.3 million. Are you saying there are 2 million fraudulent votes in Texas?Quote:
Yes the guy that couldn't fill a picnic table with supporters got more votes than even the great Obama did in 2008.
A federal judge wants every attorney whose name was on court filings seeking to overturn Michigan's presidential election results in the "Kraken" suit there to show up for a sanctions hearing on July 6. pic.twitter.com/816zUMHZ4l
— Brad Heath (@bradheath) June 17, 2021
joerobert_pete06 said:
What does that mean?
Intimidation. Of the judicial kind.joerobert_pete06 said:
What does that mean?
HTownAg98 said:
Update in the Michigan Kraken:A federal judge wants every attorney whose name was on court filings seeking to overturn Michigan's presidential election results in the "Kraken" suit there to show up for a sanctions hearing on July 6. pic.twitter.com/816zUMHZ4l
— Brad Heath (@bradheath) June 17, 2021
It's going to be on Zoom, so you can watch or listen in.
Among other things, this is the case in which lawyers for ex-Trump attorney Sidney Powell claimed she can't be sanctioned because she never signed the pleadings, even though she electronically signed them. pic.twitter.com/KgeIXyfhlO
— Brad Heath (@bradheath) June 17, 2021
schmendeler said:
you didn't have to go to a biden rally to realize that you didn't want trump reelected.
joerobert_pete06 said:
What does that mean?
FIFY. I'm sure this is what you meant.blacksox said:joerobert_pete06 said:
What does that mean?
It means the judge is about punish anyone who dared uncover the truth about the stolen election.
blacksox said:joerobert_pete06 said:
What does that mean?
It means the judge is about to unload on any and all lawyers who allowed their names to be attached to Trump's frivolous lawsuit. Sanctions are coming.
MASAXET said:HTownAg98 said:
Update in the Michigan Kraken:A federal judge wants every attorney whose name was on court filings seeking to overturn Michigan's presidential election results in the "Kraken" suit there to show up for a sanctions hearing on July 6. pic.twitter.com/816zUMHZ4l
— Brad Heath (@bradheath) June 17, 2021
It's going to be on Zoom, so you can watch or listen in.Among other things, this is the case in which lawyers for ex-Trump attorney Sidney Powell claimed she can't be sanctioned because she never signed the pleadings, even though she electronically signed them. pic.twitter.com/KgeIXyfhlO
— Brad Heath (@bradheath) June 17, 2021