Yep. A friend keeps sending me this stuff. I told her if it's true and Trump ends up winning, I'll give her $1,000!
Spyderman said:
Maury Ballstein said:
Sidney has nothing. Can't figure out if she got duped or if she's in on the con. This Soros illuminati crap only works on 4chan.
Cant Think of a Name said:
Either 1) she is a conspiracy nut, 2) shes lying to the base to get a speaking circuit book deal, or else 3) i need to find some new conspiracies to follow because mine are coming true....
Faustus said:
Maybe she just means biblical in the sense that you have to have faith there's evidence that would withstand judicial scrutiny.
Maybe she means that the court will order up a plague of locusts.HoustonAggie37713 said:
If something "Biblical" was coming, there is no way Trump would be quiet on Twitter. Use your head, people.
Doesn't the lawsuit have to specify all legal allegations, charges, or whatever they are called? She's right that they don't specify the evidence.titan said:
She got more specific near the end, or the questions got a little more capable of being answer rather than being too broad. For one thing, nothing expected Monday, hope to have some things put together Wednesday, if not Friday. (remember this is Thanksgiving week, and much will stall, my words, not hers).
Straight up confirmed the likely rigging against Bernie in 2016, and what is even more, that he was bought off. (which is generally believed anyway). But it will be interesting to see if AOC has anything to say on that, and Bernie's other supporters.
Also did say James probably won, which would be great if they can make that happen. Not only would it make GA runoffs less tension, but you would get a great new Senator addition.
Something that really jumped out in regard to both media and even posts asking for `evidence' is something maybe Hawg can confirm.
She pointed out something flat that just puts a different take entirely. Worded to this effect: "All these calls for evidence don't understand -- this isn't a summary of judgement motion --- a typical lawsuit files simply statement of what the charges are --- it is not even necessary to present all the evidence or much at that point. Its absurd what the media is calling for asking for evidence up front in a filing."
So bottom line is, kind of what would expect, you are not going to see a great deal of evidence before appeals court judges do.
She also said this --- "what is so bad, it could be a month later, and they would have to overturn the certifications based on what we have. Its not how the courts work."
I don't know if that is true or not, but it sounds like the kind of thing those who know that stuff would know at once or not.
Hard to tell, very hard to tell her veracity. But the mention of a Democrat in 2003 complaining about the fore-runner of thise machine makes sense --- can't help but notice thats a year before Dems would say Bush's re-election was assisted by Diebold machines. Given how out of favor was by then, it doesn't seem out of the pale.
Quote:
If something "Biblical" was coming, there is no way Trump would be quiet on Twitter. Use your head, people.
Same here. Wait two more weeks!!!YouBet said:
She's lying.
Sorry, but my faith in any of this is long gone.
Ive stepped away from this since election night for the most part and every time I check back in I see the same tick tock kind of crap that never produces anything.
Quote:
Straight up confirmed the likely rigging against Bernie in 2016, and what is even more, that he was bought off. (which is generally believed anyway). But it will be interesting to see if AOC has anything to say on that, and Bernie's other supporters.
Quote:
but common sense says it would be: the lay public WILL NOT hear the evidence before the appeals court judges do at a minimum, and maybe the SCOTUS.
As an OdessaTard I totally agree.OdessaAg said:
**** or get off of the pot Sidney
It's embarrassing for you if you're a MIDDLE school educated adult and believe what CNN is hawking. But you do on a daily basis.TheFirebird said:
It's embarrassing for you if you're a high school educated adult and believe what Powell is out here hawking.
IF fraud has been committed via the Dominion Software in 2020, I believe the concept would be that there was ZERO expectation Trump would win, therefore nothing needed to be done in Dominion.Pumpkinhead said:
70,000,000 votes were cast using Dominion voting systems in 2016. So I guess Trump was the pick back then by this SPECTRE like network that Powell claims exists? Or did they take a holiday in 2016 and that election was legit?
Has she explained how if SPECTRE apparently controls the U.S. govt. including DOJ, CIA, FBI,and the military speculated by her, how can she have any confidence that SCOTUS has not also been bought off or are members of SPECTRE
Cant Think of a Name said:
Those are, in fact, Q posts. The dates on the posts are accurate and not photoshopped
tysker said:
Not one reference to Ghostbusters on this thread. Some of you are wound way too tight right now.
black_ice said:Cant Think of a Name said:
Those are, in fact, Q posts. The dates on the posts are accurate and not photoshopped
Care to extrapolate?
mesocosm said:
Powell's Schtick is to sow as much doubt as possible with baseless conspiracies with the goal of delaying certification, poisoning the well of public opinion, and pressuring the state legislatures to try and select pro Trump electors. It is an attempt to disenfranchise American voters and basically end Democracy in this country. It won't work, but it will damage the country, perhaps beyond repair