If this trend continues..

6,456 Views | 118 Replies | Last: 4 days ago by jrdaustin
Troutslime
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The best solution is a Biden concession.

He makes a speech and drops Dominion in the grease to try and save his party.
AgBMF42
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Georgia's audit proved Dominion isn't doing anything fishy.
Good Poster
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AgBMF42 said:

Georgia's audit proved Dominion isn't doing anything fishy.
Georgia didn't do an audit.
FCBlitz
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Agreed. But Biden isn't calling the shots. He has no say in the matter.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Troutslime said:

The best solution is a Biden concession.

He makes a speech and drops Dominion in the grease to try and save his party.
He'd be permanently in the basement with a ball gag if he even thought about doing that. They are too close to getting everything they want. Just have to knock off a few more GOP senators (besides the Georgia runoff) to get there.
Troutslime
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
FCBlitz said:

Agreed. But Biden isn't calling the shots. He has no say in the matter.


If he's smart he's making his plea as well.
AgBMF42
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Good Poster said:

AgBMF42 said:

Georgia's audit proved Dominion isn't doing anything fishy.
Georgia didn't do an audit.


Georgia did a preplanned audit to make sure their new election system (including Dominion) was legit. The preplanned audit did not have to be the presidential election, but it was chosen because duh.
FtBendTxAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Blue star for delusion.
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The detachment from reality just reached its apex

Good Poster
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AgBMF42 said:

Good Poster said:

AgBMF42 said:

Georgia's audit proved Dominion isn't doing anything fishy.
Georgia didn't do an audit.


Georgia did a preplanned audit to make sure their new election system (including Dominion) was legit. The preplanned audit did not have to be the presidential election, but it was chosen because duh.
They literally just recounted the votes (which included the fraudulent votes) and nothing about it was an audit. No signature verification.

And even in the recount they found thousands of votes that weren't counted and I believe the tally is now 2 people involved with the election in Georgia that have quit.
rocky the dog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

The best solution is a Biden concession.
Elections are when people find out what politicians stand for, and politicians find out what people will fall for.
Troutslime
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
FtBendTxAg said:

Blue star for delusion.


You'd prefer 4 more years of national tension and the realization of how corrupt we are?
AgBMF42
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Good Poster said:

AgBMF42 said:

Good Poster said:

AgBMF42 said:

Georgia's audit proved Dominion isn't doing anything fishy.
Georgia didn't do an audit.


Georgia did a preplanned audit to make sure their new election system (including Dominion) was legit. The preplanned audit did not have to be the presidential election, but it was chosen because duh.
They literally just recounted the votes (which included the fraudulent votes) and nothing about it was an audit. No signature verification.

And even in the recount they found thousands of votes that weren't counted and I believe the tally is now 2 people involved with the election in Georgia that have quit.


There is no such thing as signature verification after the fact, ballots don't have signatures on them. They hand counted votes to make sure they physical receipts from the machine matched the electronic count.
Good Poster
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AgBMF42 said:

They hand counted votes to make sure they physical receipts from the machine matched the electronic count.


So.. not an audit. Got it. Glad we are on the same page.
AgBMF42
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Good Poster said:

AgBMF42 said:

They hand counted votes to make sure they physical receipts from the machine matched the electronic count.


So.. not an audit. Got it. Glad we are on the same page.


An audit is to make sure the ballots were correctly counted, as in making sure Dominion wasn't switching votes.
DallasAg 94
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AgBMF42 said:

Good Poster said:

AgBMF42 said:

Georgia's audit proved Dominion isn't doing anything fishy.
Georgia didn't do an audit.


Georgia did a preplanned audit to make sure their new election system (including Dominion) was legit. The preplanned audit did not have to be the presidential election, but it was chosen because duh.
This was before or after the late software updates using non-certified code?!

unmade bed
How long do you want to ignore this user?
OP, just curious what tea leaves you are reading that have you convinced things are trending in such a way that Biden should just concede?

Was it Dominion deciding not to participate in the PA congressional hearings?
Maroon Dawn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Joe and the DNC concedes in exchange for immunity and that we all pretend the Dems had no idea what Dominion was doing and Dominion blames a rogue programmer so nobody important serves a second of jail time

Dems then release the BLM/ANTIFA full force to burn it all to the ground
titan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
aggiehawg said:

Troutslime said:

The best solution is a Biden concession.

He makes a speech and drops Dominion in the grease to try and save his party.
He'd be permanently in the basement with a ball gag if he even thought about doing that. They are too close to getting everything they want. Just have to knock off a few more GOP senators (besides the Georgia runoff) to get there.
That actually does rate Manassas, warts and all, though. There are some indicators they won't do that--- they actually have the perfect excuse not to indulge their radicals as things stand.
FrioAg 00:
Leftist Democrats "have completely overplayed the Racism accusation. Honestly my first reaction when I hear it today is to assume bad intentions by the accuser, not the accused."
AgBMF42
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DallasAg 94 said:

AgBMF42 said:

Good Poster said:

AgBMF42 said:

Georgia's audit proved Dominion isn't doing anything fishy.
Georgia didn't do an audit.


Georgia did a preplanned audit to make sure their new election system (including Dominion) was legit. The preplanned audit did not have to be the presidential election, but it was chosen because duh.
This was before or after the late software updates using non-certified code?!




While your question is based on untruths, the code doesn't matter if you hand count the receipts/ballots.
TriAg2010
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Good Poster said:

AgBMF42 said:

Good Poster said:

AgBMF42 said:

Georgia's audit proved Dominion isn't doing anything fishy.
Georgia didn't do an audit.


Georgia did a preplanned audit to make sure their new election system (including Dominion) was legit. The preplanned audit did not have to be the presidential election, but it was chosen because duh.
They literally just recounted the votes (which included the fraudulent votes) and nothing about it was an audit. No signature verification.

And even in the recount they found thousands of votes that weren't counted and I believe the tally is now 2 people involved with the election in Georgia that have quit.


What's the proof there are fraudulent ballots? Trump campaign has had weeks to provide evidence. We've seen nothing.
DallasAg 94
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AgBMF42 said:

Good Poster said:

AgBMF42 said:

They hand counted votes to make sure they physical receipts from the machine matched the electronic count.


So.. not an audit. Got it. Glad we are on the same page.


An audit is to make sure the ballots were correctly counted, as in making sure Dominion wasn't switching votes.
An audit recount is to make sure the ballots were correctly counted, as in making sure Dominion wasn't switching votes.

An audit is much... much different.

When companies get an audit... they don't just recount the money in the bank to make sure the money in-hand is the money they have in-hand. HTH.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
DallasAg 94 said:

AgBMF42 said:

Good Poster said:

AgBMF42 said:

Georgia's audit proved Dominion isn't doing anything fishy.
Georgia didn't do an audit.


Georgia did a preplanned audit to make sure their new election system (including Dominion) was legit. The preplanned audit did not have to be the presidential election, but it was chosen because duh.
This was before or after the late software updates using non-certified code?!


Seems you and I are the only ones who know that Dominion was still messing the source code in mid October in Georgia. Wonder where else they did the same?
Good Poster
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AgBMF42 said:

ballots don't have signatures on them


Mail in-ballots absolutely do.
MaxPower
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AgBMF42 said:

Good Poster said:

AgBMF42 said:

Good Poster said:

AgBMF42 said:

Georgia's audit proved Dominion isn't doing anything fishy.
Georgia didn't do an audit.


Georgia did a preplanned audit to make sure their new election system (including Dominion) was legit. The preplanned audit did not have to be the presidential election, but it was chosen because duh.
They literally just recounted the votes (which included the fraudulent votes) and nothing about it was an audit. No signature verification.

And even in the recount they found thousands of votes that weren't counted and I believe the tally is now 2 people involved with the election in Georgia that have quit.


There is no such thing as signature verification after the fact, ballots don't have signatures on them. They hand counted votes to make sure they physical receipts from the machine matched the electronic count.
I'm an auditor by trade. We would refer to that as unauditable. You don't "pass" your audit because you've destroyed the evidence and altered the procedures to narrow the scope to look at only what is feasible. It's a scope limitation that, if the Georgia SOS had any integrity, would be made abundantly clear in their messaging as to how "successful" their audit was.
Good Poster
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TriAg2010 said:

Good Poster said:

AgBMF42 said:

Good Poster said:

AgBMF42 said:

Georgia's audit proved Dominion isn't doing anything fishy.
Georgia didn't do an audit.


Georgia did a preplanned audit to make sure their new election system (including Dominion) was legit. The preplanned audit did not have to be the presidential election, but it was chosen because duh.
They literally just recounted the votes (which included the fraudulent votes) and nothing about it was an audit. No signature verification.

And even in the recount they found thousands of votes that weren't counted and I believe the tally is now 2 people involved with the election in Georgia that have quit.


What's the proof there are fraudulent ballots? Trump campaign has had weeks to provide evidence. We've seen nothing.
I guess I missed the part where the Trump campaign was supposed to make sure TriAg2010 had all the evidence he needs instead of giving it to the courts (which they are preparing to do).
AgBMF42
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg said:

DallasAg 94 said:

AgBMF42 said:

Good Poster said:

AgBMF42 said:

Georgia's audit proved Dominion isn't doing anything fishy.
Georgia didn't do an audit.


Georgia did a preplanned audit to make sure their new election system (including Dominion) was legit. The preplanned audit did not have to be the presidential election, but it was chosen because duh.
This was before or after the late software updates using non-certified code?!


Seems you and I are the only ones who know that Dominion was still messing the source code in mid October in Georgia. Wonder where else they did the same?


What does the counting machine source code have to do with the hand counted audit?
DallasAg 94
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AgBMF42 said:

DallasAg 94 said:

AgBMF42 said:

Good Poster said:

AgBMF42 said:

Georgia's audit proved Dominion isn't doing anything fishy.
Georgia didn't do an audit.


Georgia did a preplanned audit to make sure their new election system (including Dominion) was legit. The preplanned audit did not have to be the presidential election, but it was chosen because duh.
This was before or after the late software updates using non-certified code?!




While your question is based on untruths, the code doesn't matter if you hand count the receipts/ballots.
See... you starting to see the difference between a recount and an audit.
AgBMF42
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MaxPower said:

AgBMF42 said:

Good Poster said:

AgBMF42 said:

Good Poster said:

AgBMF42 said:

Georgia's audit proved Dominion isn't doing anything fishy.
Georgia didn't do an audit.


Georgia did a preplanned audit to make sure their new election system (including Dominion) was legit. The preplanned audit did not have to be the presidential election, but it was chosen because duh.
They literally just recounted the votes (which included the fraudulent votes) and nothing about it was an audit. No signature verification.

And even in the recount they found thousands of votes that weren't counted and I believe the tally is now 2 people involved with the election in Georgia that have quit.


There is no such thing as signature verification after the fact, ballots don't have signatures on them. They hand counted votes to make sure they physical receipts from the machine matched the electronic count.
I'm an auditor by trade. We would refer to that as unauditable. You don't "pass" your audit because you've destroyed the evidence and altered the procedures to narrow the scope to look at only what is feasible. It's a scope limitation that, if the Georgia SOS had any integrity, would be made abundantly clear in their messaging as to how "successful" their audit was.



Uhhh your definition of auditable would mean we can't have a private ballot/secret election.


They audited the count by making sure the physical ballot receipts that voters verified before putting into the counting machines matched the electronic results.

AgBMF42
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DallasAg 94 said:

AgBMF42 said:

DallasAg 94 said:

AgBMF42 said:

Good Poster said:

AgBMF42 said:

Georgia's audit proved Dominion isn't doing anything fishy.
Georgia didn't do an audit.


Georgia did a preplanned audit to make sure their new election system (including Dominion) was legit. The preplanned audit did not have to be the presidential election, but it was chosen because duh.
This was before or after the late software updates using non-certified code?!




While your question is based on untruths, the code doesn't matter if you hand count the receipts/ballots.
See... you starting to see the difference between a recount and an audit.


A recount would be sending the ballots back through Dominion machines.

An audit is hand verifying the physical receipts match the electronic count.
annie88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AgBMF42 said:

Georgia's audit proved Dominion isn't doing anything fishy.


No it didn't and it wasn't an audit. They simply recounted the same votes, Without signatures without checking the dominion machines, which is basically worthless.

How is it that you don't understand this?
I’m just here for the food.
annie88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
FCBlitz said:

Agreed. But Biden isn't calling the shots. He has no say in the matter.


He won't have much say in the matter of the presidency, actually, if he becomes president either.
I’m just here for the food.
annie88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AgBMF42 said:

Good Poster said:

AgBMF42 said:

Georgia's audit proved Dominion isn't doing anything fishy.
Georgia didn't do an audit.


Georgia did a preplanned audit to make sure their new election system (including Dominion) was legit. The preplanned audit did not have to be the presidential election, but it was chosen because duh.


Well that's a completely embarrassing statement for a human being to make.
I’m just here for the food.
AgBMF42
How long do you want to ignore this user?
annie88 said:

AgBMF42 said:

Georgia's audit proved Dominion isn't doing anything fishy.


No it didn't and it wasn't an audit. They simply recounted the same votes, Without signatures without checking the dominion machines, which is basically worthless.
How is it that you don't understand this?


What do you not understand about Dominion software not mattering if there is a physical receipt that can be hand counted?

What do you not understand about signatures not being assigned to a ballot being a fundamental part of a secret election.
Good Poster
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The ignorance on this board is fascinating(ly scary).
Last Page
Page 1 of 4
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.