Who are you talking too? Yourself. Again.Potcake said:
Do y'all also sit around and smash your fingers with a hammer for entertainment too?
Yea, yea, you'll vote this down like everything else that hurts your feelings.
Who are you talking too? Yourself. Again.Potcake said:
Do y'all also sit around and smash your fingers with a hammer for entertainment too?
Yea, yea, you'll vote this down like everything else that hurts your feelings.
I'm sorry, what trend? I didn't see this Biden speech. What's the latest?Troutslime said:
The best solution is a Biden concession.
He makes a speech and drops Dominion in the grease to try and save his party.
AgBMF42 said:DallasAg 94 said:See... you starting to see the difference between a recount and an audit.AgBMF42 said:DallasAg 94 said:This was before or after the late software updates using non-certified code?!AgBMF42 said:Good Poster said:Georgia didn't do an audit.AgBMF42 said:
Georgia's audit proved Dominion isn't doing anything fishy.
Georgia did a preplanned audit to make sure their new election system (including Dominion) was legit. The preplanned audit did not have to be the presidential election, but it was chosen because duh.
While your question is based on untruths, the code doesn't matter if you hand count the receipts/ballots.
A recount would be sending the ballots back through Dominion machines.
An audit is hand verifying the physical receipts match the electronic count.
unmade bed said:
OP, just curious what tea leaves you are reading that have you convinced things are trending in such a way that Biden should just concede?
Was it Dominion deciding not to participate in the PA congressional hearings?
Almost 50% of democrats believe the election was a fraud.Good Poster said:
There really is no point in trying to convince liberals of fraud. They know there's fraud. They just don't care.
Blue star to infinityBigRobSA said:HoustonAggie37713 said:AgBMF42 said:
Georgia's audit proved Dominion isn't doing anything fishy.
How are people this stupid?
Liberalism and public schools
Artorias said:AgBMF42 said:DallasAg 94 said:See... you starting to see the difference between a recount and an audit.AgBMF42 said:DallasAg 94 said:This was before or after the late software updates using non-certified code?!AgBMF42 said:Good Poster said:Georgia didn't do an audit.AgBMF42 said:
Georgia's audit proved Dominion isn't doing anything fishy.
Georgia did a preplanned audit to make sure their new election system (including Dominion) was legit. The preplanned audit did not have to be the presidential election, but it was chosen because duh.
While your question is based on untruths, the code doesn't matter if you hand count the receipts/ballots.
A recount would be sending the ballots back through Dominion machines.
An audit is hand verifying the physical receipts match the electronic count.
No it is a hand recount. Quit intentionally conflating audit with recount.
Im Gipper said:
The detachment from reality just reached its apex
policywonk98 said:Im Gipper said:
The detachment from reality just reached its apex
The same media ignoring Dominion spent nearly 6 months and millions of dollars doing their own research and recount of Florida...AFTER the Scotus decision.
L
AgBMF42 said:policywonk98 said:Im Gipper said:
The detachment from reality just reached its apex
The same media ignoring Dominion spent nearly 6 months and millions of dollars doing their own research and recount of Florida...AFTER the Scotus decision.
L
How did Dominion steal votes if there is an auditable paper trail?
Yes, it seems people have a different definition of an audit. But since this is a Georgia matter, why not go by the Georgia government's explanation of its Risk Limiting Audit.Good Poster said:
First it was, well they did an audit so looks like Dominion is squeaky clean.
Then it was, well everyone has a different definition of what an audit is.
Now it's "I'm right until proven wrong" (although has been proven wrong at every turn on this thread).
Conservative Ag said:
If Dominion has the ability to switch votes, the manual recount isn't going to to be able to detect that.
Not sure why that's so difficult to grasp.
boboguitar said:Conservative Ag said:
If Dominion has the ability to switch votes, the manual recount isn't going to to be able to detect that.
Not sure why that's so difficult to grasp.
Why would that be the case?
Troutslime said:boboguitar said:Conservative Ag said:
If Dominion has the ability to switch votes, the manual recount isn't going to to be able to detect that.
Not sure why that's so difficult to grasp.
Why would that be the case?
If a Trump vote is switched to a Biden vote, the receipt will show a vote for Biden.
boboguitar said:Troutslime said:boboguitar said:Conservative Ag said:
If Dominion has the ability to switch votes, the manual recount isn't going to to be able to detect that.
Not sure why that's so difficult to grasp.
Why would that be the case?
If a Trump vote is switched to a Biden vote, the receipt will show a vote for Biden.
Are they hand counting the ballots or the receipt? Any sources for that information?
Quote:
The first ballot batches that should be given to audit boards are the absentee ballots because these are hand-marked ballots.
Conservative Ag said:
If Dominion has the ability to switch votes, the manual recount isn't going to to be able to detect that.
Not sure why that's so difficult to grasp.
Troutslime said:
Explain the early morning spikes.
boboguitar said:
I mean, reading through this makes me think they are hand counting ballots, not receipts.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/abcnews.go.com/amp/Politics/georgia-counties-start-hand-count-audit-friday-morning/story%3fid=74175628
1. They use the term ballot everywhere (but I'll allow that maybe they are conflating ballot for receipt)
2. They specifically call out hand written absentee ballots. A receipt would not be hand written.Quote:
The first ballot batches that should be given to audit boards are the absentee ballots because these are hand-marked ballots.
If you have another source that says they are hand counting receipts, I'd love for you to produce that source.
SeMgCo87 said:
Somehow, I just can't shake the feeling that AgBMF42 is a sock. Even though BMF implies "Barnes, Mark F", the comments are more like the silly kindergarten level circular logic crap thrown up against the wall by Eric76. Is the "42" a reference the answer to the Ultimate Question in Hitchhiker...
Thank God and Greyhound he is protected by the Rule of Law concept of "Innocent until proven guilty".
Otherwise, we'd all be spiking the Flag...
BMX Bandit said:
What is the "trend"?
Good Poster said:
There really is no point in trying to convince liberals of fraud. They know there's fraud. They just don't care.
AgBMF42 said:
Georgia's audit proved Dominion isn't doing anything fishy.
ScottishFire said:AgBMF42 said:
Georgia's audit proved Dominion isn't doing anything fishy.
You mean Georgia's recount?
Where they just went ahead and recounted all the fraudulent votes?
aggiehawg said:Georgia Sec State announced a random audit a few week back. That started and continued on for a few hours and then he announced three things: a full audit, a recanvass (signatures) and a hand recount. All three were to be statewide per his announcement. Leading many, myself included, to deduce they had found enough irregularities in the random audit that warranted a full in depth dive.Cassius said:AgBMF42 said:Good Poster said:Georgia didn't do an audit.AgBMF42 said:
Georgia's audit proved Dominion isn't doing anything fishy.
Georgia did a preplanned audit to make sure their new election system (including Dominion) was legit. The preplanned audit did not have to be the presidential election, but it was chosen because duh.
Georgia didn't do an audit.
But then, that's not what happened. We didn't hear about any percentages of an audit being completed in counties. We did hear about found ballots in several counties that hadn't been machine counted and that was by virtue of hand recount. There still hasn't been official explanations for how that happened, even though two of those election officials out of the three counties affected were fired.
Sound fishy enough yet?
Quote:
The issue in Fayette County involved a memory card from an early voting ballot-scanning machine that hadn't been loaded, Sterling said. In Floyd County, the problem occurred when election workers apparently didn't scan over 2,600 ballots sitting in a box, he said.
AgBMF42 said:DallasAg 94 said:This was before or after the late software updates using non-certified code?!AgBMF42 said:Good Poster said:Georgia didn't do an audit.AgBMF42 said:
Georgia's audit proved Dominion isn't doing anything fishy.
Georgia did a preplanned audit to make sure their new election system (including Dominion) was legit. The preplanned audit did not have to be the presidential election, but it was chosen because duh.
While your question is based on untruths, the code doesn't matter if you hand count the receipts/ballots.