So they hand counted 6000 votes wrong? uhh smells like I stepped in dog crap.aggiehawg said:
So he is claiming that Antrim County doesn't license the digital ballot adjudication? It is all done by hand?
*****OFFICIAL ELECTION DAY THREAD*****
2,705,187 Views |
20889 Replies |
Last: 2 yr ago by Whistle Pig
Has to be a lie if they found the digital adjudication files from the previous elections, but not from this one.aggiehawg said:
So he is claiming that Antrim County doesn't license the digital ballot adjudication? It is all done by hand?
Now it's COVID COVID!
mentioned that earlier. Seems like deletion of those files this time was the cover for the digital adjudication.txags92 said:Has to be a lie if they found the digital adjudication files from the previous elections, but not from this one.aggiehawg said:
So he is claiming that Antrim County doesn't license the digital ballot adjudication? It is all done by hand?
Mission accomplished.TxFoundry said:aggiehawg said:
His original idea was to help blind people vote? Did I hear that correctly?
That's what he said.
They moved their HQs to Denver in 2010 because they needed to be in the country to get the thirty % of the business from ES&S under a divestiture order by Holder led Obama DOJ.
In the last few minutes. Dominion machines can be connected to internet, not recommended but if they were, it's on local officials.
And if vote is adjudicated, new ballot is printed so the hand recount will match? I don't think he really wanted to say that.
And if vote is adjudicated, new ballot is printed so the hand recount will match? I don't think he really wanted to say that.
Now he says they don't use Solar Winds Orion platform.
This seems significant. Need to compare the original ballots to the adjudicated ones.aggiehawg said:
In the last few minutes. Dominion machines can be connected to internet, not recommended but if they were, it's on local officials.
And if vote is adjudicated, new ballot is printed so the hand recount will match? I don't think he really wanted to say that.
Of course, I'm sure the original ones are unexplainably gone. When all else fails, blame the local officials.
With this many questions, I don't see how this election was ever certified to begin with, and I don't see how it isn't contested by Republicans in the House.
These Senators deserve credit. They are trying to understand.
But they really should have an IT specialist who can also speak in layman's terms asking questions.
But they really should have an IT specialist who can also speak in layman's terms asking questions.
This is the absolute key. That piece of info yesterday connected a lot of dots.Ag87H2O said:This seems significant. Need to compare the original ballots to the adjudicated ones.aggiehawg said:
In the last few minutes. Dominion machines can be connected to internet, not recommended but if they were, it's on local officials.
And if vote is adjudicated, new ballot is printed so the hand recount will match? I don't think he really wanted to say that.
Of course, I'm sure the original ones are unexplainably gone. When all else fails, blame the local officials.
With this many questions, I don't see how this election was ever certified to begin wiht, and I don't see how it isn't contested by Repulicans in the House.
Is this Cari Kelemen tweet accurate?
What were Dominion employees doing at the the counting place in Detroit? TCF Center? Two employees and a contractor (Melissa Carone).
Just there to do whatever the local officials asked them to do.
Just there to do whatever the local officials asked them to do.
Carrone was the one with the damming testimony about "the same batches being run through the machine several times." The testimony just now seems to corroborate the possibility that very well can happen and the only way to catch it would be to do a full canvas/audit including looking at machines, tabulators and poll books.
Yeah and by saying that his employees and Ms. Carone were only there to do what the local election officials asked them to do could come back to bite him.ShawnTxAg said:
Carrone was the one with the damming testimony about "the same batches being run through the machine several times." The testimony just now seems to corroborate the possibility that very well can happen and the only way to catch it would be to do a full canvas/audit including looking at machines, tabulators and poll books.
"So if your employees see election workers doing something wrong that could affect the final results such rescanning the same batch of ballots over and over again without a discard function, your employees are told to keep their mouths shut? And you call such a service that you charge for?"
And in fact it was Ms. Carone's testimony that she did approach her Dominion supervisor and pointed out the errors that were happening in tabulation and was told, "We aren't here to run their elections for them."
When the questioning resumes, I think it will be on just that topic.
And we already know the poll books were way off. That excruciating direct examination Rudy did on the older Asian lady, Mrs. Jacobs, established that as well. Before the election she was directed to just add names to the poll books to match the name on the mail in ballot and put in the weird birthdate 01/01/1900.ShawnTxAg said:
Carrone was the one with the damming testimony about "the same batches being run through the machine several times." The testimony just now seems to corroborate the possibility that very well can happen and the only way to catch it would be to do a full canvas/audit including looking at machines, tabulators and poll books.
Looks like Dominion's lawyer just took a swig of scotch. FTR: he likes it over ice.
Wait, the CEO doesn't pay any attention to the certification process with the EAC? Doesn't know if they ever get feed back from them?
He doesn't even know which version of his own software was being used in Michigan??
So how exactly does one match up a paper ballot with the digital image well after the fact?
So here's the simple truth.
70% of the ballots had to be manually adjudicated where a new ballot COULD be printed with the desired results.
AND
Republicans weren't present during this.
AND
Since a new ballot was produced with the desired outcome, a hand recount will match the original machine count perfectly.
100% possible and pretty easy based on today's testimony.
This voting system is a total joke!
70% of the ballots had to be manually adjudicated where a new ballot COULD be printed with the desired results.
AND
Republicans weren't present during this.
AND
Since a new ballot was produced with the desired outcome, a hand recount will match the original machine count perfectly.
100% possible and pretty easy based on today's testimony.
This voting system is a total joke!
Do they have to have the original ballot with the adjudicated ballot when they do the recount to verify the info is correct? If not then that is a mess
And he went back and forth on whether Antrim County did or did not use digital adjudication, except there were other digital adjudication logs according to the forensics, just not one for November's election. How does that happen?FriscoKid said:
So here's the simple truth.
70% of the ballots had to be manually adjudicated where a new ballot COULD be printed with the desired results.
AND
Republicans weren't present during this.
AND
Since a new ballot was produced with the desired outcome, a hand recount will match the original machine count perfectly.
100% possible and pretty easy based on today's testimony.
This voting system is a total joke!
He may have been a founder of this company but his technical knowledge makes me think he was the money man side of the "founding."
The funny thing to me is that they are trying to claim the Antrim county dominion machines weren't updated correctly so that is why they had 68% adjudication, but if you look across the country at the amount of adjudicated ballots in different states you know that is just BS.FriscoKid said:
So here's the simple truth.
70% of the ballots had to be manually adjudicated where a new ballot COULD be printed with the desired results.
AND
Republicans weren't present during this.
AND
Since a new ballot was produced with the desired outcome, a hand recount will match the original machine count perfectly.
100% possible and pretty easy based on today's testimony.
This voting system is a total joke!
There is supposed to be an "audit mark" on the new ballot but how that matches to a specific "spoiled" paper ballot remains unclear to me.ClassicAg18 said:
Do they have to have the original ballot with the adjudicated ballot when they do the recount to verify the info is correct? If not then that is a mess
Tim Pool said in one of his videos on TimCast today that 7 states are sending dueling electors so there is at least one corroboration for you.
Tim Pool doesn't know what he's talking about then. Trump electors in 7 states he lost went ahead and cast their Trump votes in case the certified Biden electors get thrown out somehow. They're not "dueling electors" in the sense that the state legislature certified an alternate set of electors which differ from the ones already certfied by SOS/Governor...etc.ClassicAg18 said:
Tim Pool said in one of his videos on TimCast today that 7 states are sending dueling electors so there is at least one corroboration for you.
you ever played the game memory?? Now imagine doing that with millions of ballots!!
Edit: Double post. Deleted.
A tabulating system that prints ballots? Sounds completely legitFriscoKid said:
So here's the simple truth.
70% of the ballots had to be manually adjudicated where a new ballot COULD be printed with the desired results.
AND
Republicans weren't present during this.
AND
Since a new ballot was produced with the desired outcome, a hand recount will match the original machine count perfectly.
100% possible and pretty easy based on today's testimony.
This voting system is a total joke!
Cool, right?
Rumors of this started early on and seem to be confirmed....There should NEVER been tabulating scanners used that can also PRINT ballots. That is just quite simply asking to have massive fraud.captkirk said:A tabulating system that prints ballots? Sounds completely legitFriscoKid said:
So here's the simple truth.
70% of the ballots had to be manually adjudicated where a new ballot COULD be printed with the desired results.
AND
Republicans weren't present during this.
AND
Since a new ballot was produced with the desired outcome, a hand recount will match the original machine count perfectly.
100% possible and pretty easy based on today's testimony.
This voting system is a total joke!
Correction said:
Edit: Double post. Deleted.
Username checks out.
Habanero Guero
Earley Honeymoon Phase Over Quicker Than Expected
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
64
Nonregdrummer09
Earley Honeymoon Phase Over Quicker Than Expected
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
35