BobaFettsClone said:

---

Fitch said:

---

malenurse said:

---

BurnetAggie99 said:

---

All for the Red States forming a Union let's get the party started

---

All the states are Red. Only the cities are blue

---

land doesn't vote

---

Sadly for land, any idiot who can fog a mirror (as well as several that can't) gets to vote. The blissful ignorance of, and blind acceptance by, the majority of our population is shamefully embarrassing.

---

will25u said:

---

---

SexyAg said:

---

For those in the "we need scientific proof of cheating" camp...

---

TRM said:

---

No urgency...

---

TRM said:

---

The SOS will only agree to redactions that look like the original Flynn document release - a bunch of black boxes and 1 sentence.

---

M-K-TAG said:

---

TRM said:

---

The SOS will only agree to redactions that look like the original Flynn document release - a bunch of black boxes and 1 sentence.

---

well that's ridiculous... If that's correct its kind of useless then.

---

Aggie369 said:

---

This legit?

---

will25u said:

---

---

munch96 said:

---

will25u said:

---

---

Link to Report:

https://beta.documentcloud.org/documents/20423772-antrim-county-forensics-report

---

RedHand said:

---

munch96 said:

---

will25u said:

---

---

Link to Report:

https://beta.documentcloud.org/documents/20423772-antrim-county-forensics-report

---

The twitter link with the totals of adjudicated ballots is pretty crazy. However, I need some clarification. If I a ballot is adjudicated does it create a new ballot that is then stored? I am asking because wouldn't a hand recount catch a lot of these ballots that are switched in adjudication?

---

will25u said:

---

Don't know if all of this will go anywhere, but the news for this morning has been a whirlwind.

---

LostInLA07 said:

---

On this basis, I don't know how you'd throw out any votes where a voter said they are indefinitely confined:

In its final decision, the justices concluded that it's up to each voter not the county clerks or anyone else to decide if and when they qualify as indefinitely confined.

---

BadMoonRisin said:

---

RedHand said:

---

will25u said:

---

Don't know if all of this will go anywhere, but the news for this morning has been a whirlwind.

---

What are they going to do, visit every voter that claimed indefinitely confined?

---

No time for that. Toss them all

---

Quote:

---

The Campaign does not challenge the ballots of individual voters. Rather, the Campaign argues that all voters claiming indefinitely confined status since the date of the erroneous advice should have their votes invalidated, whether they are actually indefinitely confined or not. Although the number of individuals claiming indefinitely confined status has increased throughout the state, the Campaign asks us to apply this blanket invalidation of indefinitely confined voters only to ballots cast in Dane and Milwaukee Counties, a total exceeding 28,000 votes.

The Campaign's request to strike indefinitely confined voters in Dane and Milwaukee Counties as a class without regard to whether any individual voter was in fact indefinitely confined has no basis in reason or law; it is wholly without merit.

We conclude the challenge to indefinitely confined voter ballots is without merit, and that laches bars relief on the remaining three categories of challenged ballots. The Campaign is not entitled to relief, and therefore does not succeed in its effort to strike votes and alter the certified winner of the 2020 presidential election.

---

LostInLA07 said:

---

On this basis, I don't know how you'd throw out any votes where a voter said they are indefinitely confined:

In its final decision, the justices concluded that it's up to each voter not the county clerks or anyone else to decide if and when they qualify as indefinitely confined.

---