*****OFFICIAL ELECTION DAY THREAD*****

2,705,449 Views | 20889 Replies | Last: 2 yr ago by Whistle Pig
XpressAg09
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
62strat said:

Case dismissed; natural death it is. .


Sir, this is 2020. That would be classified a COVID Death.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
And so it begins:

Quote:

Georgia election officials are confident every ballot will be counted for the U.S. Senate runoff elections, which begins with early voting on Monday.

Early voting for the runoffs will include fewer voting locations than in November, limited weekend hours and close scrutiny of election workers.

The Atlanta Journal-Constitution reported turnout is expected to be high, though not near the record 5 million voters who turned out for last month's presidential election. More than 1.1 million absentee ballots have been requested so far, compared to a total of 1.3 million in the general election.

Counties around the state are addressing challenges for the runoffs.

One example is Cobb County, the state's third-largest county. Cobb County was criticized after reducing its number of early voting locations from 11 for the general election to five for the runoff. The county has since added two more locations for the last week of early voting, which runs Dec. 14-Jan. 1.

Elections Director Janine Eveler said her county didn't have enough workers to staff as many early voting sites. Fifteen people who worked the November election resigned after multiple recounts forced long hours.

"It'll be pretty high turnout, but we're prepared for that," Eveler told the Atlanta Journal-Constitution. "We have capacity for early, Election Day and absentee voting."

In Fayette County last month, a statewide recount determined one memory card from a machine used during early voting hadn't been accounted for initially.

''We have our own internal plan to prevent what happened last time," said Darryl Hicks, chairman of Fayette County's election board. "We will solve the issue of forgetting to count a memory card."

Hicks said a log sheet will be kept to make sure every memory card is uploaded.

The runoff elections will be between Republican U.S. Sens. David Perdue and Kelly Loeffler and Democrats Jon Ossoff and Raphael Warnock.

Normal Election Day precincts will be open on the day of the runoffs, Jan. 5.
LINK
agcrock2005
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

More than 1.1 million absentee ballots have been requested so far, compared to a total of 1.3 million in the general election.
SOB! We better have R's in the damn rooms in Fulton County this time!
Reload8098
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It will be a slam dunk corrupt win for the unethical, amoral radical left.
captkirk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
chjoak said:

The election was rigged and there is significant witness account. If another state does not have standing, who does?
Nobody. Get it
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
captkirk said:

chjoak said:

The election was rigged and there is significant witness account. If another state does not have standing, who does?
Nobody. Get it


Exactly. Voter fraud is an unchallengeable act. Voters do not have standing to sue, candidates who lost do not have standing to sue, and other states who followed the rules do not have standing to sue. If nobody has standing to sue, why is anybody following the rules?
p-townag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
txags92 said:

captkirk said:

chjoak said:

The election was rigged and there is significant witness account. If another state does not have standing, who does?
Nobody. Get it


Exactly. Voter fraud is an unchallengeable act. Voters do not have standing to sue, candidates who lost do not have standing to sue, and other states who followed the rules do not have standing to sue. If nobody has standing to sue, why is anybody following the rules?


Exactly. Very few are. We have the technology to secure it, but nobody's willing to make it happen.
BurnetAggie99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
All for the Red States forming a Union let's get the party started
ravingfans
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Reload8098 said:

I carry this unrealistic hope that there has to be one decent person from the left who looks at what's going on, looks into the mirror and decides it's time to have integrity. Doesn't seem to be even one, like Sodom and Gomorra.
Fck it let them take themselves down and let's form a new republic.


There may not be a "decent" person on the left, but there are going to be plenty who will be telling the truth when confronted with Life in Prison or worse.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
txags92 said:

captkirk said:

chjoak said:

The election was rigged and there is significant witness account. If another state does not have standing, who does?
Nobody. Get it


Exactly. Voter fraud is an unchallengeable act. Voters do not have standing to sue, candidates who lost do not have standing to sue, and other states who followed the rules do not have standing to sue. If nobody has standing to sue, why is anybody following the rules?
This. Listening to the hearings and court cases when available, few of our elected officials and judges seem to care about massive and repeated violations of election law.

The last two days has been focused on Wisconsin. A full day of joint hearing by members of the House and Senate of Wisconsin (which the Dem members departed very early because they can't handle the truth) and then yesterday the Wisconsin state supreme court.

Very disappointing in both. Only one judge on the state supreme court was even interested in questioning why the Wisconsin Election Commission was issuing guidance to voters that was contrary to the statutes. One.

The state legislators (Republican) were more concerned but their legislative "counsels" kept telling them there was no recourse, nothing the state legislature could do about it. (The counselors were either lying or very bad lawyers, of course.)

I started a thread a few weeks back asking when would the repeated violations of state election laws be "enough" to find that this election lacked integrity and should be put aside purely on the basis of lawlessness of the various state election officials that directly impacted the alleged results? Possession may be nine tenths of the law but that doesn't remove the one tenth wherein possession was only obtained through theft.
Reload8098
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ravingfans said:

Reload8098 said:

I carry this unrealistic hope that there has to be one decent person from the left who looks at what's going on, looks into the mirror and decides it's time to have integrity. Doesn't seem to be even one, like Sodom and Gomorra.
Fck it let them take themselves down and let's form a new republic.


There may not be a "decent" person on the left, but there are going to be plenty who will be telling the truth when confronted with Life in Prison or worse.

One can hope but it doesn't seem many ever get caught. I think they are gearing up to fry the Bidens, get Joe out so they can push the radical agenda over the next 2 years because they fear they may lose the house or senate. The senate has 34 seats up for grabs in 2022 and the entire house. Of course there could be many dems that won't go along with the radical agenda because they want to be reelected. I realize it won't happen but I would get behind and help lead succession if the movement really began to have legs.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
malenurse
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BurnetAggie99 said:

All for the Red States forming a Union let's get the party started
All the states are Red. Only the cities are blue
The Debt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
malenurse said:

BurnetAggie99 said:

All for the Red States forming a Union let's get the party started
All the states are Red. Only the cities are blue

They need to leave those lands and travel to the red states. "Go Galt" and watch the blue states starve.
ravingfans
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The Debt said:

malenurse said:

BurnetAggie99 said:

All for the Red States forming a Union let's get the party started
All the states are Red. Only the cities are blue

They need to leave those lands and travel to the red states. "Go Galt" and watch the blue states starve.


Learned in Genesis this week in SS that God wanted people to spread out and not be so concentrated in Babel. It was one of the reasons He got so mad.

Perhaps we eliminate big cities and go to a rural and suburban nation?
Comanche_Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
NM, not tech savvy.


will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Debt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ravingfans said:

The Debt said:

malenurse said:

BurnetAggie99 said:

All for the Red States forming a Union let's get the party started
All the states are Red. Only the cities are blue

They need to leave those lands and travel to the red states. "Go Galt" and watch the blue states starve.


Learned in Genesis this week in SS that God wanted people to spread out and not be so concentrated in Babel. It was one of the reasons He got so mad.

Perhaps we eliminate big cities and go to a rural and suburban nation?

Dude. Babel is a scarier analogy than you realize. The hebrew says they spoke with one lip and one tongue. Not only did they have the same language, but they had the same vocabulary. Vocabulary dictates thought (think 1984, or even the current speech codes the authoritarian left want to demand.) Babel is the original dystopian nightmare, but like everything American wont be outdone. Our greatness outshined empires and our fall will be magnificently dreadful for the entire world.
richardag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
agcrock2005 said:

Quote:

More than 1.1 million absentee ballots have been requested so far, compared to a total of 1.3 million in the general election.
SOB! We better have R's in the damn rooms in Fulton County this time!
Won't happen, the Democratic Party leadership, MSM and their obedient followers got away with thuggish behavior with no consequences so they will repeat this corrupt behavior.
Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'm a retired lawyer not a statistician nor an actuary. Can someone with that background read THIS and translate for me? TIA.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Doubt there is anything to this, but this is the place to put it.

aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
will25u said:

Doubt there is anything to this, but this is the place to put it.


Sooo not happening.
Fitch
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
malenurse said:

BurnetAggie99 said:

All for the Red States forming a Union let's get the party started
All the states are Red. Only the cities are blue
land doesn't vote
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Fitch said:

malenurse said:

BurnetAggie99 said:

All for the Red States forming a Union let's get the party started
All the states are Red. Only the cities are blue
land doesn't vote
Supposedly neither do dead people, nor mentally unfit people in nursing homes. But.....
ChemEAg08
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Fitch said:

malenurse said:

BurnetAggie99 said:

All for the Red States forming a Union let's get the party started
All the states are Red. Only the cities are blue
land doesn't vote


Cities don't grow/raise food.
PacoPicoPiedra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Fitch said:

malenurse said:

BurnetAggie99 said:

All for the Red States forming a Union let's get the party started
All the states are Red. Only the cities are blue
land doesn't vote


Sadly for land, any idiot who can fog a mirror (as well as several that can't) gets to vote. The blissful ignorance of, and blind acceptance by, the majority of our population is shamefully embarrassing.
Conspiracies are the norm, not the exception.
rab79
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

I'm a retired lawyer not a statistician nor an actuary. Can someone with that background read THIS and translate for me? TIA.
It has been awhile since I was last called a SAS guru, but he appears to have compared voting patterns of individual counties that changed to dominion voting machines between 2008 and 2020, while controlling for various changes other than the voting machine change, by using a multiple regression analysis.

Given the P values he has reported, if he controlled for the other factors accurately, the presence of dominion voting machines skewed voting patterns in the 2020 election toward the democrats without a doubt as a Pvalue less than .05 is typically used to establish statistical significance of the effect under study. He concluded that the presence of dominion voting machines changed voting patterns toward democrats by an average of 1.5 percent nationwide but didn't report changes for individual states..

I would really be interested in seeing an Rsquare value for the variability in voting patterns that could be attributed to the voting system used.

Hope this helped a little bit and didn't just muddy the waters further

ETA images

2008 dominion voting machine distribution

2020 dominion voting machine distribution



Question why did Georgia go from no dominion machines in 2016 to 100% in 2020 (go to hawgs link for the 2016 map)
NO AMNESTY!

in order for democrats, liberals, progressives et al to continue their illogical belief systems they have to pretend not to know a lot of things; by pretending "not to know" there is no guilt, no actual connection to conscience. Denial of truth allows easier trespass.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
rab79 said:

aggiehawg said:

I'm a retired lawyer not a statistician nor an actuary. Can someone with that background read THIS and translate for me? TIA.
It has been awhile since I was last called a SAS guru, but he appears to have compared voting patterns of individual counties that changed to dominion voting machines between 2008 and 2020, while controlling for various changes other than the voting machine change, by using a multiple regression analysis.

Given the P values he has reported, if he controlled for the other factors accurately, the presence of dominion voting machines skewed voting patterns in the 2020 election toward the democrats without a doubt as a Pvalue less than .05 is typically used to establish statistical significance of the effect under study. He concluded that the presence of dominion voting machines changed voting patterns toward democrats by an average of 1.5 percent nationwide but didn't report changes for individual states..

I would really be interested in seeing an Rsquare value for the variability in voting patterns that could be attributed to the voting system used.

Hope this helped a little bit and didn't just muddy the waters further
So, you understood that? Is that a real problem? I know certain people attack me for asking questions but I really just want to know the truth.
rab79
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

rab79 said:

aggiehawg said:

I'm a retired lawyer not a statistician nor an actuary. Can someone with that background read THIS and translate for me? TIA.
It has been awhile since I was last called a SAS guru, but he appears to have compared voting patterns of individual counties that changed to dominion voting machines between 2008 and 2020, while controlling for various changes other than the voting machine change, by using a multiple regression analysis.

Given the P values he has reported, if he controlled for the other factors accurately, the presence of dominion voting machines skewed voting patterns in the 2020 election toward the democrats without a doubt as a Pvalue less than .05 is typically used to establish statistical significance of the effect under study. He concluded that the presence of dominion voting machines changed voting patterns toward democrats by an average of 1.5 percent nationwide but didn't report changes for individual states..

I would really be interested in seeing an Rsquare value for the variability in voting patterns that could be attributed to the voting system used.

Hope this helped a little bit and didn't just muddy the waters further
So, you understood that? Is that a real problem? I know certain people attack me for asking questions but I really just want to know the truth.
Yeah my background is biology where everything is variable, if I could get the P values he was showing I could use them to change regulations and they would stand up in court. I have in fact used less certain results to support changes in state regulations.

He appears to have taken a logical approach to the analysis and done his best to account for mitigating factors and used an appropriate analysis technique.

To answer your question yes it appears to be a real problem and given his apparent background I would tend to give a lot of credence to his conclusions.

And the only stupid questions are the ones that get you fired or shot.
NO AMNESTY!

in order for democrats, liberals, progressives et al to continue their illogical belief systems they have to pretend not to know a lot of things; by pretending "not to know" there is no guilt, no actual connection to conscience. Denial of truth allows easier trespass.
Post removed:
by user
Agsrback12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rendered Fat said:

" More than 1.1 million absentee ballots have been requested so far"

If this his true, then it's already over.


Can they not verify them this time knowing what we know now?
rab79
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Agsrback12 said:

Rendered Fat said:

" More than 1.1 million absentee ballots have been requested so far"

If this his true, then it's already over.


Can they not verify them this time knowing what we know now?
You are assuming the people in charge are interested in verification and a fair outcome, instead of a predetermined result. So sure, they could but why would they? It would just work against their ultimate goal.
NO AMNESTY!

in order for democrats, liberals, progressives et al to continue their illogical belief systems they have to pretend not to know a lot of things; by pretending "not to know" there is no guilt, no actual connection to conscience. Denial of truth allows easier trespass.
ravingfans
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
rab79 said:

Agsrback12 said:

Rendered Fat said:

" More than 1.1 million absentee ballots have been requested so far"

If this his true, then it's already over.


Can they not verify them this time knowing what we know now?
You are assuming the people in charge are interested in verification and a fair outcome, instead of a predetermined result. So sure, they could but why would they? It would just work against their ultimate goal.


Yes-- CAN and WILL are two very different things...
Fitch
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

Fitch said:

malenurse said:

BurnetAggie99 said:

All for the Red States forming a Union let's get the party started
All the states are Red. Only the cities are blue
land doesn't vote
Supposedly neither do dead people, nor mentally unfit people in nursing homes. But.....
touch. Blue parachute para tu
Thinice
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Does anyone else remember the NY Times website during the 2016 election? It showed results down to the county level and had percentage chance to win the state. Think it also showed how each county had voted previously. Was an official reason given this year why they did away with it?
First Page Last Page
Page 394 of 597
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.