No Bat Soup For You said:RooAg said:
Pretty much the same on MSNBC and CBS. Nothing.
Do these organizations even fall under the 1st amendment since they've taken it upon themselves to suppress information? I don't really see how they are considered "the press" anymore. They've just become the 4th branch of a corrupt government and the illiberals hold 95% of the seats in this branch.
Sensational? Absolutely.GeorgiAg said:
An obvious sensationalist story magically appears one week before the election? Color me shocked!
No one cares beyond right wing media and the forum 16 echo chamber.
Pro2Percent said:
You guys are beyond funny. Were you this concerned about Trump and Ukraine/Trump and Taxes/Trump and hush money/Trump and 100 other scandals?
...and they were not even flagged for context, much less banned for being false, by social media.RooAg said:
Yes, I think most people were. If Trump committed crimes, he should be punished.
However, you kind of proved the point. You know about those "100 other scandals" because they were covered as nauseum by the press, even though many, if not all, were proven baseless in terms of illegality. Yet here we are on a "scandal" that has much more corroboration that many of those of Trump's and its crickets. So thanks for helping prove the argument.
zephyr88 said:Yah, right... I guess the man's name without any other words is too vague for CNN's news filter.BMX Bandit said:
Try different key words.
GeorgiAg said:
An obvious sensationalist story magically appears one week before the election? Color me shocked!
No one cares beyond right wing media and the forum 16 echo chamber.
I think that misses the point. Just like with the Clinton Foundation, foreign entities are pre-paying for influence over a soon-to-be POTUS.Proc92 said:
Until there is some evidence of Joe getting some money from a deal while he was vp, this won't go anywhere.
If you are CNN and that is what you believe, then you run a story saying that and demonstrating why you believe that because this is a big story getting attention by your competitors at the very least. But, they are choosing to completely ignore the very EXISTENCE of this and anything else having to do with Biden corruption. That tells you all you need to know. They are burying this story to protect Biden. There is no other explanation, and that removes any pretense of them being a news organization. They should be treated as a disinformation business and should be tried for conspiracy to commit election fraud.GeorgiAg said:
An obvious sensationalist story magically appears one week before the election? Color me shocked!
No one cares beyond right wing media and the forum 16 echo chamber.
Getting the money is not the most important part of this. The fact that Joe is compromised for national security is what is important and makes him unfit for any office or any level of security clearance.Proc92 said:
Until there is some evidence of Joe getting some money from a deal while he was vp, this won't go anywhere.
Of course. The money Trail to joe being discovered is what is needed to get the story off the ground. More an indictment of the msm than the story itself.American Hardwood said:Getting the money is not the most important part of this. The fact that Joe is compromised for national security is what is important and makes him unfit for any office or any level of security clearance.Proc92 said:
Until there is some evidence of Joe getting some money from a deal while he was vp, this won't go anywhere.
tsuag10 said:
At this point we have no other choice than to believe that the heads of the MSM networks have been given SPECIFIC instructions to not cover this at all.
Otherwise you would have a couple of reporters going rouge here and there.
I can't come up with another logical reason why there would be a complete blackout like this.
GeorgiAg said:
An obvious sensationalist story magically appears one week before the election? Color me shocked!
No one cares beyond right wing media and the forum 16 echo chamber.
There is another way. Something about thirsty trees or something...nu awlins ag said:tsuag10 said:
At this point we have no other choice than to believe that the heads of the MSM networks have been given SPECIFIC instructions to not cover this at all.
Otherwise you would have a couple of reporters going rouge here and there.
I can't come up with another logical reason why there would be a complete blackout like this.
100% spot on. These cats have been liberal leaning for years and the only way to end this, is for a wealthy conservative to buy one of the outlets and fire everyone. The truth no longer matters to them.....
YouBet said:
Maybe CNN uses the same search technology that TexAgs does?
GeorgiAg said:
An obvious sensationalist story magically appears one week before the election? Color me shocked!
No one cares beyond right wing media and the forum 16 echo chamber.
Yep. Shows you just how deeply in bed the left and the media are. No longer just a threat to our democracy. It's actively - at this very moment - destroying our democracy.tsuag10 said:
At this point we have no other choice than to believe that the heads of the MSM networks have been given SPECIFIC instructions to not cover this at all.
Otherwise you would have a couple of reporters going rouge here and there.
I can't come up with another logical reason why there would be a complete blackout like this.
The MSM ran a story on how many F'ing scoops of ice cream Trump gets compared to the others.GeorgiAg said:
An obvious sensationalist story magically appears one week before the election? Color me shocked!
No one cares beyond right wing media and the forum 16 echo chamber.
Pro2Percent said:
You guys are beyond funny. Were you this concerned about Trump and Ukraine/Trump and Taxes/Trump and hush money/Trump and 100 other scandals?
Pro2Percent said:
You guys are beyond funny. Were you this concerned about Trump and Ukraine/Trump and Taxes/Trump and hush money/Trump and 100 other scandals?
